OBJECTIVE: To define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and assess the feasibility of intravenous (IV) docetaxel, intraperitoneal (IP) carboplatin and IP paclitaxel in women with stage II-IV untreated ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal carcinoma. METHODS: Patients received docetaxel (55-75 mg/m(2)) IV and carboplatin (AUC 5-7) IP on day 1 and paclitaxel 60 mg/m(2) IP on day 8. A standard 3+3 design was used in the dose escalation phase. A 2-stage group sequential design with 20 patients at the MTD was used in the feasibility phase. RESULTS: The MTD determined during the dose escalation phase was day 1 docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) IV, carboplatin AUC 6 IP and day 8 IP paclitaxel 60 mg/m(2). Forty-six patients were enrolled in the feasibility portion at this dose level. Six were unevaluable. Fifteen evaluable patients had dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) within the first four cycles. These DLTs were prolonged neutropenia (2), neutropenic fever (7), grade 4 thrombocytopenia (1), grade 4 dehydration (1), grade 3 infection (2), grade 3 oral mucositis (1) and pulmonary embolism (1). CONCLUSIONS: Docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) IV, carboplatin AUC 6 IP administered on day 1, and paclitaxel 60 mg/m(2) IP administered on day 8, is the MTD when considering one cycle of treatment but was not feasible over four cycles due to bone marrow toxicity. We recommend reduction of carboplatin to AUC 5 should this regimen be considered for treatment in women with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer.
OBJECTIVE: To define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and assess the feasibility of intravenous (IV) docetaxel, intraperitoneal (IP) carboplatin and IP paclitaxel in women with stage II-IV untreated ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal carcinoma. METHODS:Patients received docetaxel (55-75 mg/m(2)) IV and carboplatin (AUC 5-7) IP on day 1 and paclitaxel 60 mg/m(2) IP on day 8. A standard 3+3 design was used in the dose escalation phase. A 2-stage group sequential design with 20 patients at the MTD was used in the feasibility phase. RESULTS: The MTD determined during the dose escalation phase was day 1 docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) IV, carboplatin AUC 6 IP and day 8 IP paclitaxel 60 mg/m(2). Forty-six patients were enrolled in the feasibility portion at this dose level. Six were unevaluable. Fifteen evaluable patients had dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) within the first four cycles. These DLTs were prolonged neutropenia (2), neutropenic fever (7), grade 4 thrombocytopenia (1), grade 4 dehydration (1), grade 3 infection (2), grade 3 oral mucositis (1) and pulmonary embolism (1). CONCLUSIONS:Docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) IV, carboplatin AUC 6 IP administered on day 1, and paclitaxel 60 mg/m(2) IP administered on day 8, is the MTD when considering one cycle of treatment but was not feasible over four cycles due to bone marrow toxicity. We recommend reduction of carboplatin to AUC 5 should this regimen be considered for treatment in women with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer.
Authors: Deborah K Armstrong; Brian Bundy; Lari Wenzel; Helen Q Huang; Rebecca Baergen; Shashikant Lele; Larry J Copeland; Joan L Walker; Robert A Burger Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-01-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: D S Alberts; P Y Liu; E V Hannigan; R O'Toole; S D Williams; J A Young; E W Franklin; D L Clarke-Pearson; V K Malviya; B DuBeshter Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1996-12-26 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Don S Dizon; Michael W Sill; Natalie Gould; Stephen C Rubin; S Diane Yamada; Robert L Debernardo; Robert S Mannel; Eric L Eisenhauer; Linda R Duska; Paula M Fracasso Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2011-08-05 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Natalie Gould; Michael W Sill; Robert S Mannel; P H Thaker; Paul Disilvestro; Steve Waggoner; S Diane Yamada; Deborah K Armstrong; Lari Wenzel; Helen Huang; Paula M Fracasso; Joan L Walker Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2011-12-11 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: M Markman; B N Bundy; D S Alberts; J M Fowler; D L Clark-Pearson; L F Carson; S Wadler; J Sickel Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2001-02-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: M Markman; B Reichman; T Hakes; S Rubin; J L Lewis; W Jones; R Barakat; J Curtin; L Almadrones; W Hoskins Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 1993-07 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Paul A Vasey; Gordon C Jayson; Alan Gordon; Hani Gabra; Rob Coleman; Ronnie Atkinson; David Parkin; James Paul; Andrea Hay; Stan B Kaye Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2004-11-17 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Oliver Zivanovic; Dennis S Chi; Qin Zhou; Alexia Iasonos; Jason A Konner; Vicky Makker; Rachel N Grisham; Amy K Brown; Stacy Nerenstone; John P Diaz; Eric D Schroeder; Carrie L Langstraat; Viktoriya Paroder; Yulia Lakhman; Krysten Soldan; Katy Su; Ginger J Gardner; Vaagn Andikyan; Jianxia Guo; Elizabeth L Jewell; Kara Long Roche; Tiffany Troso-Sandoval; Stuart M Lichtman; Lea A Moukarzel; Kimberly Dessources; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Carol Aghajanian; William P Tew; Jan Beumer; Yukio Sonoda; Roisin E O'Cearbhaill Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2021-05-21 Impact factor: 50.717
Authors: Joan L Walker; Mark F Brady; Lari Wenzel; Gini F Fleming; Helen Q Huang; Paul A DiSilvestro; Keiichi Fujiwara; David S Alberts; Wenxin Zheng; Krishnansu S Tewari; David E Cohn; Matthew A Powell; Linda Van Le; Susan A Davidson; Heidi J Gray; Peter G Rose; Carol Aghajanian; Tashanna Myers; Angeles Alvarez Secord; Stephen C Rubin; Robert S Mannel Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2019-04-19 Impact factor: 50.717