Literature DB >> 12401906

CA125 response: can it replace the traditional response criteria in ovarian cancer?

A E Guppy1, G J S Rustin.   

Abstract

CA125 is well established as an accurate and reliable means of monitoring response to treatment and confirming relapse in ovarian cancer patients. Its role in follow-up after initial treatment is less certain and the subject of a current clinical trial. Measuring response with computerized tomography scans is futile in the majority of patients, as disease is often nonmeasurable at presentation, e.g., ascites or peritoneal deposits, or all measurable disease has been removed at the time of surgery. Serial changes in CA125 can be used as a reliable indicator of disease response or progression so that patients can be classified as responding or progressing according to either standard or CA125 criteria. These precise definitions are currently being prospectively validated in conjunction with the new response evaluation criteria in solid tumor response guidelines and are being incorporated into all future clinical trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12401906     DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.7-5-437

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  15 in total

1.  Detection of autoantibodies to multiple tumor-associated antigens in the immunodiagnosis of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Liuxia Li; Kaijuan Wang; Liping Dai; Peng Wang; Xuan-Xian Peng; Jian-Ying Zhang
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.952

Review 2.  Ovarian cancer: the duplicity of CA125 measurement.

Authors:  Amer K Karam; Beth Y Karlan
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 66.675

3.  Prognostic and predictive relevance of CA-125 at primary surgery of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Dina Mury; Linn Woelber; Sabine Jung; Christine Eulenburg; Matthias Choschzick; Isabell Witzel; Joerg Schwarz; Fritz Jaenicke; Sven Mahner
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  Consolidation paclitaxel is more cost-effective than bevacizumab following upfront treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Jamie L Lesnock; Coreen Farris; Thomas C Krivak; Kenneth J Smith; Maurie Markman
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  Phase I feasibility study of intraperitoneal cisplatin and intravenous paclitaxel followed by intraperitoneal paclitaxel in untreated ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal carcinoma: a gynecologic oncology group study.

Authors:  Don S Dizon; Michael W Sill; Natalie Gould; Stephen C Rubin; S Diane Yamada; Robert L Debernardo; Robert S Mannel; Eric L Eisenhauer; Linda R Duska; Paula M Fracasso
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  Recurrent ovarian cancer: is there a role for re-treatment with bevacizumab after an initial complete response to a bevacizumab-containing regimen?

Authors:  Georgia A McCann; Blair Smith; Floor J Backes; Kellie Rath; Simi Chacko; Ritu Salani; Eric Eisenhauer; Jeffrey M Fowler; David E Cohn; David M O'Malley
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  Bevacizumab for the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  S N Akers; G Riebandt; A Miller; A Groman; K Odunsi; S Lele
Journal:  Eur J Gynaecol Oncol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 0.196

8.  Gemcitabine and cisplatin chemotherapy is an active combination in the treatment of platinum-resistant ovarian and peritoneal carcinoma.

Authors:  Devansu Tewari; Bradley J Monk; Mark Hunter; Camille A Falkner; Robert A Burger
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.850

9.  Biomarkers, the molecular gaze and the transformation of cancer survivorship.

Authors:  Kirsten Bell
Journal:  Biosocieties       Date:  2013-06

10.  Early detection biomarkers for ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Sreeja Sarojini; Ayala Tamir; Heejin Lim; Shihong Li; Shifang Zhang; Andre Goy; Andrew Pecora; K Stephen Suh
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2012-12-23       Impact factor: 4.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.