Literature DB >> 21818597

Thoracolumbar imbalance analysis for osteotomy planification using a new method: FBI technique.

J C Le Huec1, P Leijssen, M Duarte, S Aunoble.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Treatment of spine imbalance by posterior osteotomy is a valuable technique. Several surgical techniques have been developed and proposed to redress the vertebral column in harmonious kyphosis in order to recreate correct sagittal alignment. Although surgical techniques proved to be adequate, preoperative planning still is mediocre. Multiple suggestions have been proposed, from cutting tracing paper to ingenious mathematical formulas and computerised models. The analysis of the pelvic parameters to try to recover the initial shape of the spine before the spine imbalance occurred is very important to avoid mistakes during the osteotomy planification. MATERIAL AND
METHOD: The authors proposed their method for the osteotomy planning paying attention to the pelvic, and spine parameters and in accordance with Roussouly's classification. The pre operative planning is based on a full-body X-ray including the spine from C1 to the femoral head and the first 10 cm of the femur shaft. Using all the balance parameters provided, a formula name FBI is proposed. Calculation of the osteotomy is basic goniometry, the midpoint of the C7 inferior plateau (point a) is transposed horizontally on the projected future C7 plumb line (point b) crossing posterior S1 plateau on a sagittal X-ray. These are the first two reference points. A third reference point is made on the anterior wall of the selected vertebra for osteotomy at mid height of the pedicle (point c) mainly L4 vertebra. These three points form a triangle with the tip being the third reference point. The angle represented by this triangle is the theoretical angle of the osteotomy. Two more angles should be measured and eventually added. The femur angulation measured as the inclination of the femoral axis to the vertical. And a third angle named the compensatory pelvic tilt to integrate the type of pelvis. If the pelvic tilt is between 15 and 25° or is higher than 25° you must add 5 or 10°, respectively. This compensatory tilt is based on a clinical analysis of operated patients.
RESULTS: This planification was applied in a retrospective study of 18 patients and showed why in some cases improper correction was performed and prospectively in 8 cases with good clinical outcomes and correct spinal alignment. Sometimes it is necessary to find an acceptable compromise when rebalancing the spine paying attention to the general parameters of the patients like: age, osteoporosis, systemic disease etc.
CONCLUSION: This FBI technique can be used even for small lordosis restoration: it gave a good evaluation of the amount of correction needed and then the surgeon had the choice to use the appropriate technique to obtain a good balance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21818597      PMCID: PMC3175920          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-1935-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  29 in total

1.  Clinical and radiographic outcomes of thoracic and lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy for fixed sagittal imbalance.

Authors:  Benson P Yang; Stephen L Ondra; Larry A Chen; Hee Soo Jung; Tyler R Koski; Sean A Salehi
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2006-07

2.  Radiological analysis of ankylosing spondylitis patients with severe kyphosis before and after pedicle subtraction osteotomy.

Authors:  Romain Debarge; Guillaume Demey; Pierre Roussouly
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-09-11       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  [Pedicle closing-wedge osteotomy for the treatment of fixed sagittal imbalance].

Authors:  X Chiffolot; J P Lemaire; I Bogorin; J P Steib
Journal:  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot       Date:  2006-05

4.  Transpedicular decompression and pedicle subtraction osteotomy (eggshell procedure): a retrospective review of 59 patients.

Authors:  Daniel B Murrey; Craig D Brigham; Gary M Kiebzak; Frederick Finger; Samuel J Chewning
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  The impact of positive sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity.

Authors:  Steven D Glassman; Keith Bridwell; John R Dimar; William Horton; Sigurd Berven; Frank Schwab
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 6.  The natural history of human gait and posture. Part 2. Hip and thigh.

Authors:  C Owen Lovejoy
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.840

7.  Computerized preoperative planning for correction of sagittal deformity of the spine.

Authors:  Nicolas Aurouer; Ibrahim Obeid; Olivier Gille; Vincent Pointillart; Jean-Marc Vital
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 1.246

8.  Results of lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomies for fixed sagittal imbalance: a minimum 5-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Yongjung J Kim; Keith H Bridwell; Lawrence G Lenke; Gene Cheh; Christine Baldus
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 9.  Sagittal plane deformity in the adult patient.

Authors:  Samuel A Joseph; Anthony P Moreno; Jared Brandoff; Andrew C Casden; Paul Kuflik; Michael G Neuwirth
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.020

10.  ASKyphoplan: a program for deformity planning in ankylosing spondylitis.

Authors:  Barend J van Royen; Famke J Scheerder; Eric Jansen; Theo H Smit
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-04-18       Impact factor: 3.134

View more
  46 in total

1.  Classification of sagittal imbalance based on spinal alignment and compensatory mechanisms.

Authors:  Claudio Lamartina; Pedro Berjano
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  A novel technique for sublaminar-band-assisted closure of pedicle subtraction osteotomy.

Authors:  Pedro Berjano; Lorenzo Cucciati; Marco Damilano; Matteo Pejrona; Claudio Lamartina
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Failures and revisions in surgery for sagittal imbalance: analysis of factors influencing failure.

Authors:  P Berjano; R Bassani; G Casero; A Sinigaglia; R Cecchinato; C Lamartina
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Preoperative calculation of the necessary correction in sagittal imbalance surgery: validation of three predictive methods.

Authors:  P Berjano; R Cecchinato; M Damilano; C Morselli; V Sansone; C Lamartina
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Sagittal imbalance cascade for simple degenerative spine and consequences: algorithm of decision for appropriate treatment.

Authors:  J C Le Huec; S Charosky; C Barrey; J Rigal; S Aunoble
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Analysis of cervical sagittal alignment variations after lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy for severe imbalance: study of 59 cases.

Authors:  W Thompson; A Cogniet; M Challali; R Saddiki; J Rigal; Jean Charles Le Huec
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Use of EOS imaging for the assessment of scoliosis deformities: application to postoperative 3D quantitative analysis of the trunk.

Authors:  Brice Ilharreborde; Jean Dubousset; Jean-Charles Le Huec
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 8.  Osteotomies in the treatment of spinal deformities: indications, classification, and surgical planning.

Authors:  Bassel Diebo; Shian Liu; Virginie Lafage; Frank Schwab
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-05-11

9.  Pedicle subtraction osteotomies (PSO) in the lumbar spine for sagittal deformities.

Authors:  Pedro Berjano; Max Aebi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Normative values for the spine shape parameters using 3D standing analysis from a database of 268 asymptomatic Caucasian and Japanese subjects.

Authors:  Jean Charles Le Huec; Kazuhiro Hasegawa
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.