| Literature DB >> 21818333 |
Paul G Shiels1, Liane M McGlynn, Alan MacIntyre, Paul C D Johnson, G David Batty, Harry Burns, Jonathan Cavanagh, Kevin A Deans, Ian Ford, Alex McConnachie, Agnes McGinty, Jennifer S McLean, Keith Millar, Naveed Sattar, Carol Tannahill, Yoga N Velupillai, Chris J Packard.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: It has previously been hypothesized that lower socio-economic status can accelerate biological ageing, and predispose to early onset of disease. This study investigated the association of socio-economic and lifestyle factors, as well as traditional and novel risk factors, with biological-ageing, as measured by telomere length, in a Glasgow based cohort that included individuals with extreme socio-economic differences.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21818333 PMCID: PMC3144896 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022521
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Highlights the percentage change in telomere length per decade that is associated with SES and lifestyle factors.
| % change in telomere length (95% CI) per decade associated with SES & lifestyle factor | |||
| SES & Lifestyle Factor | SES & Lifestyle Factor Subgroup NO | SES & Lifestyle Factor Subgroup YES | Differences between subgroups (p-value) |
|
| −3.7 (−7.5, 0.3) p = 0.066 | −6.2 (−11.1, −1.1) p = 0.019 | 0.437 |
|
| −0.6 (−5.3, 4.2) p = 0.796 |
|
|
|
| −1.3 (−5.9, 3.5) p = 0.577 | −7.2 (−11.0, −3.2) p = 0.001 | 0.062 |
|
| −2.2 (−6.1, 1.8) p = 0.274 |
|
|
|
| −6.0 (−10.5, −1.3) p = 0.013 | −3.6 (−7.5, 0.6) p = 0.092 | 0.426 |
|
| −4.8 (−8.2, −1.3) p = 0.008 | −7.4 (−13.6, −0.8) p = 0.028 | 0.482 |
|
| −1.8 (−6.1, 2.6) p = 0.417 |
|
|
|
| −4.8 (−8.0, −1.3) p = 0.007 | −5.0 (−11.6, 2.0) p = 0.156 | 0.944 |
|
| −4.1 (−7.5, −0.4) p = 0.029 | −7.2 (−12.8, −1.2) p = 0.019 | 0.371 |
|
| −2.2 (−6.5, 2.2) p = 0.319 | −7.6 (−11.6, −3.4) p = 0.001 | 0.081 |
Individuals with an income < £25,000, housing tenants and those with a lower diet score were shown to have faster rates of age-related telomere attrition than those earning >£25,000, house owners and individuals with higher diet scores. All analyses were adjusted for age, gender and deprivation group.
Figure 1Regression analysis plots that highlight household income, housing tenure, and diet score were associated with steeper age-related decline in telomere length.
Faster rates of age-related telomere attrition were observed in individuals with an average income less than £25,000 (7.7% vs 0.6% reduction per decade, p = 0.024, (A)), home tenants (8.7% vs 2.2%, p = 0.038 (B)) and a diet score among the lower 50% of scores (7.7% vs 1.8%, p = 0.05 (C)).
Highlights the percentage change in biomarker levels that is associated with an increase in telomere length.
| Outcome | Percentage Change (95% CI)p-Value |
| Systolic BP (mmHg) | 0.2 (−1.1, 1.5) p = 0.798 |
| Diastolic BP (mmHg) | 0.3 (−1.0, 1.7) p = 0.642 |
| Cholesterol (mmol/l) | 2.4 (0.3, 4.6) p = 0.027 |
| HDL cholesterol (mmol/l) | −1.2 (−3.9, 1.6) p = 0.387 |
| LDL cholesterol (mmol/l) |
|
| Triglycerides (mmol/l) | 2.7 (−2.6, 8.3) p = 0.326 |
| Glucose (mmol/l) | 0.8 (−1.0, 2.7) p = 0.363 |
| Insulin (mU/l) | −0.5 (−7.5, 6.9) p = 0.884 |
| HOMA - IR | −0.1 (−7.5, 8.0) p = 0.989 |
| C reactive protein (mg/l) | 0.6 (−9.9, 12.4) p = 0.916 |
| Interleukin 6 (pg/ml) |
|
| Intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ng/ml) | −0.3 (−2.9, 2.3) p = 0.796 |
| Fibrinogen (g/l) | 0.2 (−1.9, 2.4) p = 0.829 |
| von Willebrand factor (IU/dl) | −1.2 (−4.2, 1.8) p = 0.416 |
| D-dimer (ng/ml) | −1.7 (−7.4, 4.4) p = 0.583 |
Individuals with longer telomeres had increased levels of total cholesterol (2.4% increase, p = 0.027) and LDL cholesterol (3.7%, p = 0.027). Conversely, shorter telomeres were associated with increased levels of IL-6 (7.2% decrease, p = 0.022). All analyses were adjusted for age, gender and deprivation group. The change in telomere length was measured by an increase of one standard deviation in log telomere length.
Highlights the percentage change in IL6 levels that is associated with an increase in telomere length.
| Adjustment covariates | % Change in IL6 Levels (95% CI) |
| None | −9.9 (−16.3, −3.0), p = 0.006 |
| Age + gender | −7.0 (−13.6, 0.1), p = 0.052 |
| … + current smoking | −5.9 (−12.4, 1.0), p = 0.094 |
| … + deprivation group | −5.7 (−11.9, 0.9), p = 0.090 |
| … + income ≥/< £25,000 | −5.6 (−11.8, 1.0), p = 0.093 |
| … + diet score ≥/< median | −5.6 (−11.8, 1.0), p = 0.096 |
This analysis was adjusted for the various different SES and lifestyle factors to determine their contribution to the difference in IL6 levels. The change in telomere length was measured by an increase of one standard deviation in log telomere length.