BACKGROUND: Telomeres are protective DNA-protein complexes at the end of linear chromosomes that promote chromosomal stability. Telomere shortness in human beings is emerging as a prognostic marker of disease risk, progression, and premature mortality in many types of cancer, including breast, prostate, colorectal, bladder, head and neck, lung, and renal cell. Telomere shortening is counteracted by the cellular enzyme telomerase. Lifestyle factors known to promote cancer and cardiovascular disease might also adversely affect telomerase function. However, previous studies have not addressed whether improvements in nutrition and lifestyle are associated with increases in telomerase activity. We aimed to assess whether 3 months of intensive lifestyle changes increased telomerase activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). METHODS: 30 men with biopsy-diagnosed low-risk prostate cancer were asked to make comprehensive lifestyle changes. The primary endpoint was telomerase enzymatic activity per viable cell, measured at baseline and after 3 months. 24 patients had sufficient PBMCs needed for longitudinal analysis. This study is registered on the ClinicalTrials.gov website, number NCT00739791. FINDINGS: PBMC telomerase activity expressed as natural logarithms increased from 2.00 (SD 0.44) to 2.22 (SD 0.49; p=0.031). Raw values of telomerase increased from 8.05 (SD 3.50) standard arbitrary units to 10.38 (SD 6.01) standard arbitrary units. The increases in telomerase activity were significantly associated with decreases in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (r=-0.36, p=0.041) and decreases in psychological distress (r=-0.35, p=0.047). INTERPRETATION: Comprehensive lifestyle changes significantly increase telomerase activity and consequently telomere maintenance capacity in human immune-system cells. Given this finding and the pilot nature of this study, we report these increases in telomerase activity as a significant association rather than inferring causation. Larger randomised controlled trials are warranted to confirm the findings of this study.
BACKGROUND: Telomeres are protective DNA-protein complexes at the end of linear chromosomes that promote chromosomal stability. Telomere shortness in human beings is emerging as a prognostic marker of disease risk, progression, and premature mortality in many types of cancer, including breast, prostate, colorectal, bladder, head and neck, lung, and renal cell. Telomere shortening is counteracted by the cellular enzyme telomerase. Lifestyle factors known to promote cancer and cardiovascular disease might also adversely affect telomerase function. However, previous studies have not addressed whether improvements in nutrition and lifestyle are associated with increases in telomerase activity. We aimed to assess whether 3 months of intensive lifestyle changes increased telomerase activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). METHODS: 30 men with biopsy-diagnosed low-risk prostate cancer were asked to make comprehensive lifestyle changes. The primary endpoint was telomerase enzymatic activity per viable cell, measured at baseline and after 3 months. 24 patients had sufficient PBMCs needed for longitudinal analysis. This study is registered on the ClinicalTrials.gov website, number NCT00739791. FINDINGS: PBMC telomerase activity expressed as natural logarithms increased from 2.00 (SD 0.44) to 2.22 (SD 0.49; p=0.031). Raw values of telomerase increased from 8.05 (SD 3.50) standard arbitrary units to 10.38 (SD 6.01) standard arbitrary units. The increases in telomerase activity were significantly associated with decreases in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (r=-0.36, p=0.041) and decreases in psychological distress (r=-0.35, p=0.047). INTERPRETATION: Comprehensive lifestyle changes significantly increase telomerase activity and consequently telomere maintenance capacity in human immune-system cells. Given this finding and the pilot nature of this study, we report these increases in telomerase activity as a significant association rather than inferring causation. Larger randomised controlled trials are warranted to confirm the findings of this study.
Authors: Jennifer Daubenmier; Jue Lin; Elizabeth Blackburn; Frederick M Hecht; Jean Kristeller; Nicole Maninger; Margaret Kuwata; Peter Bacchetti; Peter J Havel; Elissa Epel Journal: Psychoneuroendocrinology Date: 2011-12-14 Impact factor: 4.905
Authors: H Lavretsky; E S Epel; P Siddarth; N Nazarian; N St Cyr; D S Khalsa; J Lin; E Blackburn; M R Irwin Journal: Int J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2012-03-11 Impact factor: 3.485
Authors: Mengmeng Du; Jennifer Prescott; Peter Kraft; Jiali Han; Edward Giovannucci; Susan E Hankinson; Immaculata De Vivo Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2012-02-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Lisa Mirabello; Wen-Yi Huang; Jason Y Y Wong; Nilanjan Chatterjee; Douglas Reding; E David Crawford; Immaculata De Vivo; Richard B Hayes; Sharon A Savage Journal: Aging Cell Date: 2009-06-01 Impact factor: 9.304
Authors: Tim De Meyer; Katrien Vandepitte; Simon Denil; Marc L De Buyzere; Ernst R Rietzschel; Sofie Bekaert Journal: Eur J Hum Genet Date: 2013-10-23 Impact factor: 4.246
Authors: Elissa S Epel; Jue Lin; Firdaus S Dhabhar; Owen M Wolkowitz; E Puterman; Lori Karan; Elizabeth H Blackburn Journal: Brain Behav Immun Date: 2009-12-16 Impact factor: 7.217
Authors: Ramin Farzaneh-Far; Jue Lin; Elissa S Epel; William S Harris; Elizabeth H Blackburn; Mary A Whooley Journal: JAMA Date: 2010-01-20 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Daniel A Galvão; Dennis R Taaffe; Nigel Spry; Robert A Gardiner; Renea Taylor; Gail P Risbridger; Mark Frydenberg; Michelle Hill; Suzanne K Chambers; Phillip Stricker; Tom Shannon; Dickon Hayne; Eva Zopf; Robert U Newton Journal: Nat Rev Urol Date: 2016-03-08 Impact factor: 14.432