| Literature DB >> 21818276 |
Ellen Andresen1, Gunar Günther, Jörn Bullwinkel, Christoph Lange, Holger Heine.
Abstract
On-going airway inflammation is characteristic for the pathophysiology of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, the key factors determining the decrease in lung function, an important clinical parameter of COPD, are not clear. Genome-wide linkage analyses provide evidence for significant linkage to airway obstruction susceptibility loci on chromosome 8p23, the location of the human defensin gene cluster. Moreover, a genetic variation in the defensin beta 1 (DEFB1) gene was found to be associated with COPD. Therefore, we hypothesized that DEFB1 is differently regulated and expressed in human lungs during COPD progression. Gene expression of DEFB1 was assessed in bronchial epithelium and BAL fluid cells of healthy controls and patients with COPD and using bisulfite sequencing and ChIP analysis, the epigenetic control of DEFB1 mRNA expression was investigated. We can demonstrate that DEFB1 mRNA expression was significantly increased in bronchopulmonary specimen of patients with COPD (n = 34) vs. healthy controls (n = 10) (p<0.0001). Furthermore, a significant correlation could be detected between DEFB1 and functional parameters such as FEV(1) (p = 0.0024) and the FEV(1)/VC ratio (p = 0.0005). Upregulation of DEFB1 mRNA was paralleled by changes in HDAC1-3, HDAC5 and HDAC8 mRNA expression. Whereas bisulfite sequencing revealed no differences in the methylation state of DEFB1 promoter between patients with COPD and controls, ChIP analysis showed that enhanced DEFB1 mRNA expression was associated with the establishment of an active histone code. Thus, expression of human DEFB1 is upregulated and related to the decrease in pulmonary function in patients with COPD.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21818276 PMCID: PMC3139569 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021898
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Baseline characteristics of the study participants.
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| 10 | 2 | 13 | 15 | 4 |
|
| 31.3±7.8 | 73.5±7.8 | 66.9±9.9 | 66.4±7.5 | 58.3±3.6 |
| (20–46) | (68–79) | (52–82) | (46–77) | (55–63) | |
|
| 3/7 | 1/1 | 9/4 | 10/5 | 2/2 |
|
| 22.7±1.9 | 27.2±0.2 | 28.3–5.8 | 25.4±4.7 | 21.3±3.7 |
| (20.0–26.7) | (27.0–27.3) | (22.5–44.6) | (16.0–35.5) | (16.2–24.5) | |
|
| 2.9±2.8 | 50.0±14.1 | 41.9±19.3 | 39.7±16.6 | 42.5±18.9 |
| (1–7) | (40–60) | (10–85) | (5–65) | (30–70) | |
|
| 516.0±49.3 | 305.0±169.7 | 352.3±127.1 | 291.0±122.3 | 367.5±88.6 |
| (430–625) | (185–425) | (150–545) | (0–465) | (240–430) | |
|
| 104.2±16.6 | 89.9±2.0 | 63.9±10.2 | 38.2±6.2 | 26.1±2.8 |
| (60.7–117.4) | (88.5–91.3) | (50.1–79.4) | (30.2–47.3) | (22.8–29.0) | |
|
| 108.5–26.4 | 107.3±2.3 | 86.3±12.4 | 69.2±14.7 | 61.3±10.6 |
| (54.4–160.9) | (105.7–108.9) | (65.2–108.9) | (42.6–97.7) | (52.8–76.3) | |
|
| 88.7±8.6 | 73.1±11.2 | 65.6±12.6 | 46.8±10.3 | 39.1±7.5 |
| (73.5–101.5) | (65.2–81.0) | (49.5–90.7) | (30.0–66.3) | (31.5–46.3) | |
|
| † | 2.0±2.8 | 2.2±2.3 | 5.1±2.1 | 6.3±1.0 |
| (0.0–4.0) | (0.0–6.0) | (2.0–9.0) | (5.0–7.0) | ||
Data are presented as mean±Std (range), COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, M: male, F: female, BMI: body mass index, pack years: the number of cigarettes smoked per day x number of years smoked)/20 (1 pack has 20 cigarettes), 6MWD: 6-minutes walking distance, FEV1: forced expiratory volume in one second, VC: vital capacity, BODE score: index, which incorporate body mass index, airflow obstruction, dyspnoea and exercise capacity 18, % of predicted value, † not determined. Stages 1 through 4 denote severity of disease according to the Deutsche Atemwegsliga and the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Pneumologie und Beatmungsmedizin 27, with higher number indicating greater severity. (Additional characteristics of all study participants are summarized in Table S1 in the supporting information).
Figure 1DEFB1 mRNA expression analysis in bronchial epithelial cell biopsies from patients with COPD and healthy controls.
(A) Expression levels of DEFB1 mRNA in epithelial cell biopsies from patients with COPD (N = 34 total, N = 15 for COPD 1+2, N = 19 for COPD 3+4) and healthy controls (N = 10). Levels of DEFB1 mRNA were quantified by Real-time PCR, variations of transcript levels were corrected by β2-M mRNA levels and log transformed for statistical analysis. Differences between COPD patients (total) and healthy controls were tested using unpaired t-test. Analysis of variance of three groups was performed with the use of the One-way ANOVA test followed by Tukey's Multiple Comparison test. When the results were significant, the unpaired t-test was performed for comparison between the groups with differences p<0.05 considered significant. Results are presented as mean±SEM, each symbol represents a single sample. (B) Correlations between levels of DEFB1 mRNA and FEV1 and the ratio FEV1/VC and (C) correlations between levels of DEFB1 mRNA and the ratios RV/TLC, IC/TLC, ITGV and MEF50 in epithelial cell biopsies from patients with COPD (N = 34) and healthy controls (N = 10). Analyses in (B) and (C) were performed using Pearson correlations with differences p<0.05 considered significant. Each symbol represents a single sample. (The complete data and p values are given in supporting information, Table 2).
Correlation analysis of DEFB1 and DEFB4 mRNA expression.
|
|
|
| |||
| Pearson r | P value | Pearson r | P value | ||
| FEV1 | [l] | −0.52 |
| −0.20 | 0.2174 |
| FEV1 | [% predicted] | −0.43 |
| −0.12 | 0.4629 |
| VC | [% predicted] | −0.29 |
| −0.27 | 0.0920 |
| FEV1/VC | [% predicted] | −0.49 |
| 0.00 | 0.9887 |
| FEV1/FVC | [l] | −0.54 |
| −0.03 | 0.8784 |
| IC/TLC | [l] | −0.50 |
| −0.20 | 0.2045 |
| RV/TLC | [l] | 0.54 |
| 0.28 | 0.0774 |
| ITGV | [% predicted] | 0.48 |
| −0.04 | 0.7832 |
| MEF50 | [% predicted] | −0.58 |
| −0.20 | 0.2097 |
| pack years | 0.28 | 0.1051 | 0.20 | 0.2449 | |
| BODE score | 0.05 | 0.7727 | 0.20 | 0.2861 | |
| SGRQ | 0.32 | 0.1760 | −0.10 | 0.6995 | |
| CRP | [mg/dl] | 0.03 | 0.8587 | −0.04 | 0.8332 |
| pAO2 | [mm Hg] | −0.50 |
| −0.09 | 0.5775 |
DEFB1: defensin, beta 1, DEFB4: defensin, beta 4, FEV1: forced expiratory volume in one second, VC: vital capacity, FVC: forced vital capacity, IC: inspiratory capacity, RV: residual volume, TLC: total lung capacity, ITGV: intrathoracic gas volume, MEF50: maximal expiratory flow at 50%, pack years: the number of cigarettes smoked per day x number of years smoked)/20 (1 pack has 20 cigarettes), BODE score: index, which incorporates body mass index, FEV1, MRC dyspnoea scale and 6MWD 18, SGRQ: St George's Respiratory Questionnaire, CRP: c-reactive protein, paO2: arterial oxygen tension.
Figure 2HDAC mRNA expression analysis in bronchial epithelial cell biopsies from patients with COPD and healthy controls.
(A) Expression levels of HDAC1 mRNA in epithelial cell biopsies from patients with COPD (N = 34) and healthy controls (N = 10). Levels of HDAC1 mRNA were quantified by Real-time PCR, variations of transcript levels were corrected by β2-M mRNA levels and log transformed for statistical analysis. Analysis of variance between patients with COPD and healthy controls was performed by the use of the unpaired t-test with differences p<0.05 considered significant. Results are presented as mean±SEM, each symbol represents a single sample. (B) Correlations between levels of HDAC1 mRNA and HDAC1-3, 5 and 8 mRNA in epithelial cell biopsies from patients with COPD (N = 34) and healthy controls (N = 10). Analysis was performed using Pearson correlations with differences p<0.05 considered significant. Each symbol represents a single sample. (The complete data and p values are given in supporting information, Figures S2 and S3).
Figure 3Bisulfite sequencing analysis of CpG methylation in bronchial epithelial cell biopsies.
(A) Schematic view of the DEFB1 gene (NCBI GeneID: 1672) with exons displayed as filled boxes; the transcriptional start site is indicated; coding sequences are marked in black and 5′-UTR is shown in gray. Vertical arrows represent locations of eight CpG sites on the DEFB1 promoter (region 1) relative to the transcriptional start site and seven CpG sites on the DEFB1 downstream part of intron and exon 2 (region 2). (B) Bisulfite sequencing analysis of CpG methylation in bronchial epithelial cell biopsies of patients with COPD and healthy controls (both, N = 5 for region 1, N = 2 for region 2). Genomic DNA was treated as described, amplified by PCR and cloned for sequencing. At least 10 individual sequences (clones) were sequenced and analyzed per study subject. Each sequence (clone) is represented by a row and clones from the same subject are grouped. The individual CpG sites are arrayed in columns. Filled circles indicate methylated CpG; open circles indicate unmethylated CpG. (C) Average percentage of methylation for each CpG site of region 1 and levels of the corresponding DEFB1 mRNA expression for patients with COPD (N = 5, gray bars) and healthy controls (N = 5, black bars). Results are presented as mean±SEM.
Figure 4Analysis of histone H3 lysine 4 methylation (H3K4me3) within the DEFB1 locus in BAL fluid cells.
(A) Expression levels of DEFB1 mRNA in BAL fluid cells from patients with COPD (N = 34) and healthy controls (N = 10). Levels of DEFB1 mRNA were quantified by Real-time PCR, variations of transcript levels were corrected by β2-M mRNA levels and log transformed for statistical analysis. Analysis of variance between patients with COPD and healthy controls was performed by the use of the unpaired t-test with differences p<0.05 considered significant. Results are presented as mean±SEM, each symbol represents a single sample. (B) Schematic view of the DEFB1 gene (NCBI GeneID: 1672) with exons displayed as filled boxes; the transcriptional start site and location of PCR primer sets used in ChIP experiments are indicated; coding sequences are marked in black and 5′-UTR is shown in gray. (C) Correlations between levels of H3K4me3 and DEFB1 mRNA in BAL fluid cells from study participants (N = 11) regardless of their COPD status. Levels of H3K4me3 were analyzed by ChIP using specific antibodies and quantified by Real-time PCR. The ChIP values are expressed as % of input corrected by subtracting values for no-antibody control and normalized on total histone H4. Correlations analysis was performed using Pearson correlations with differences p<0.05 considered significant. Each symbol represents a single sample.