OBJECT: To design and evaluate a fully shielded, λ/4 stripline resonator as a receive-only surface coil for preclinical MRI at 4.7 T. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 20 mm diameter stripline surface coil was fabricated from double-sided Duroid 5880 PCB material and was directly coupled to the input of a MOSFET preamplifier, without requiring a matching network. The new coil was compared with a conventional 20 mm, wire loop, receive-only surface coil in imaging experiments with a separate transmit-only saddle coil. RESULTS: The stripline surface coil exhibits a loaded Q-factor of 132 at 200 MHz, compared to 138 for a conventional wire loop coil and its resonant frequency drops by 0.2 MHz under loading, rather than 0.5 MHz for the wire loop. The stripline coil displays a more symmetrical B1 map compared to the wire loop, but the SNR falls off more rapidly with depth so it is 30% poorer 8 mm from the coil plane. It should be possible, however, to reduce this difference by using a thicker dielectric in future versions of the stripline coil. CONCLUSION: Compared to a conventional surface coil, the stripline coil is easy to manufacture, requires shorter set-up times and shows reduced dielectric interaction with conductive samples.
OBJECT: To design and evaluate a fully shielded, λ/4 stripline resonator as a receive-only surface coil for preclinical MRI at 4.7 T. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 20 mm diameter stripline surface coil was fabricated from double-sided Duroid 5880 PCB material and was directly coupled to the input of a MOSFET preamplifier, without requiring a matching network. The new coil was compared with a conventional 20 mm, wire loop, receive-only surface coil in imaging experiments with a separate transmit-only saddle coil. RESULTS: The stripline surface coil exhibits a loaded Q-factor of 132 at 200 MHz, compared to 138 for a conventional wire loop coil and its resonant frequency drops by 0.2 MHz under loading, rather than 0.5 MHz for the wire loop. The stripline coil displays a more symmetrical B1 map compared to the wire loop, but the SNR falls off more rapidly with depth so it is 30% poorer 8 mm from the coil plane. It should be possible, however, to reduce this difference by using a thicker dielectric in future versions of the stripline coil. CONCLUSION: Compared to a conventional surface coil, the stripline coil is easy to manufacture, requires shorter set-up times and shows reduced dielectric interaction with conductive samples.
Authors: Gregor Adriany; Pierre-Francois Van de Moortele; Florian Wiesinger; Steen Moeller; John P Strupp; Peter Andersen; Carl Snyder; Xiaoliang Zhang; Wei Chen; Klaas P Pruessmann; Peter Boesiger; Tommy Vaughan; Kāmil Uğurbil Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 4.668