Literature DB >> 28265801

Performing and Declining PGD: Accounts of Jewish Israeli Women Who Carry a BRCA1/2 Mutation or Partners of Male Mutation Carriers.

Efrat Dagan1, Daphna Birenbaum-Carmeli2, Eitan Friedman3,4, Baruch Feldman5.   

Abstract

To describe factors associated with preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) decisions among Jewish Israeli BRCA1/2 carriers or spouses of a male carrier, we contacted all women who initiated PGD consultation for embryonic BRCA1/2 mutation detection at Sheba Medical Center, prior to March 2014. Applying a qualitative approach, we asked women to elaborate on the factors they considered in either opting for PGD or discontinuing the screening procedure. Participants were 18 Jewish Israeli women; 14 were carriers of one of the Ashkenazi founder mutations in BRCA1/2, and four were spouses of male mutation carriers, who underwent at least one cycle of PGD. Prior to seeking PGD, ten of the women had no children. At the time of the interview, all but three had at least one child. Three factors emerged as key motivators for PGD: having witnessed the disease in a close relative (n = 12); prior IVF treatment for infertility (n = 12); and having pre-existing frozen embryos (n = 6). Ten women withdrew from the PGD process due to clinical, logistical, and financial reasons. In conclusion, most women decided to withdraw from PGD instead of continuing until a successful conception was achieved. Those who opted for PGD attributed their discontinuation of further screening to the emotional burden that is greatly intensified by practical difficulties.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BRCA1/2; Decision making process; Hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer syndrome; Preimplantation genetic diagnosis; Prenatal genetic diagnosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28265801     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-017-0087-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  37 in total

1.  Attitudes to reproductive genetic testing in women who had a positive BRCA test before having children: a qualitative analysis.

Authors:  Elizabeth Ormondroyd; Louise Donnelly; Clare Moynihan; Cornelie Savona; Elizabeth Bancroft; D Gareth Evans; Rosalind Eeles; Stuart Lavery; Maggie Watson
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  BRCA carriers' thoughts on risk management in relation to preimplantation genetic diagnosis and childbearing: when too many choices are just as difficult as none.

Authors:  Gwendolyn P Quinn; Susan T Vadaparampil; Sharon Tollin; Cheryl A Miree; Devin Murphy; Bethanne Bower; Celso Silva
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Incorporating information regarding preimplantation genetic diagnosis into discussions concerning testing and risk management for BRCA1/2 mutations: a qualitative study of patient preferences.

Authors:  Karen Hurley; Lisa R Rubin; Allison Werner-Lin; Michal Sagi; Yelena Kemel; Rikki Stern; Aliza Phillips; Ina Cholst; Noah Kauff; Kenneth Offit
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis of inherited cancer: familial adenomatous polyposis coli.

Authors:  A Ao; D Wells; A H Handyside; R M Winston; J D Delhanty
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Relative contributions of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations to "triple-negative" breast cancer in Ashkenazi Women.

Authors:  E Comen; M Davids; T Kirchhoff; C Hudis; K Offit; M Robson
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Familial clustering of site-specific cancer risks associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in the Ashkenazi Jewish population.

Authors:  Sharon Simchoni; Eitan Friedman; Bella Kaufman; Ruth Gershoni-Baruch; Avi Orr-Urtreger; Inbal Kedar-Barnes; Ronit Shiri-Sverdlov; Efrat Dagan; Sigal Tsabari; Mordechai Shohat; Raphael Catane; Mary-Claire King; Amnon Lahad; Ephrat Levy-Lahad
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Young age at diagnosis correlates with worse prognosis and defines a subset of breast cancers with shared patterns of gene expression.

Authors:  Carey K Anders; David S Hsu; Gloria Broadwater; Chaitanya R Acharya; John A Foekens; Yi Zhang; Yixin Wang; P Kelly Marcom; Jeffrey R Marks; Phillip G Febbo; Joseph R Nevins; Anil Potti; Kimberly L Blackwell
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  A qualitative inquiry of the financial concerns of couples opting to use preimplantation genetic diagnosis to prevent the transmission of known genetic disorders.

Authors:  Kathryn T Drazba; Michele A Kelley; Patricia E Hershberger
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 9.  High-risk consumers' perceptions of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for hereditary cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gwendolyn P Quinn; Tuya Pal; Devin Murphy; Susan T Vadaparampil; Ambuj Kumar
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  The prevalence of BRCA1 mutations among young women with triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  S R Young; Robert T Pilarski; Talia Donenberg; Charles Shapiro; Lyn S Hammond; Judith Miller; Karen A Brooks; Stephanie Cohen; Beverly Tenenholz; Damini Desai; Inuk Zandvakili; Robert Royer; Song Li; Steven A Narod
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  3 in total

1.  Uptake of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis in Female BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers.

Authors:  Pnina Mor; Sarah Brennenstuhl; Kelly A Metcalfe
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  The decision-making process, experience, and perceptions of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) users.

Authors:  Shachar Zuckerman; Sigal Gooldin; David A Zeevi; Gheona Altarescu
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Regulating reproductive genetic services: dealing with spiral-shaped processes and techno-scientific imaginaries.

Authors:  Ido Alon; Rosa Urbanos-Garrido; José Guimón
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.412

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.