Literature DB >> 20206525

Complexity increases working memory for mating signals.

Karin L Akre1, Michael J Ryan.   

Abstract

Females often prefer to mate with males who produce complex signals. It is not clear why they do so. Females might prefer complexity if it predicts mate quality, or signals might evolve complexity to exploit females' sensory or cognitive biases. We tested whether complexity increases active time, the period over which a signal influences a receiver's response to that signal. Mating signals are often ephemeral, yet their active time has largely been ignored. Here we demonstrate that signal complexity influences active time in túngara frogs. Male advertisement calls consist of frequency sweeps (whines) followed by 0-7 high-frequency bursts (chucks). Females preferentially approach complex (whines with chucks) over simple (whines alone) calls but do not consistently prefer greater complexity, so the function of multiple chucks has been uncertain. We found that females remember which speaker previously broadcast complex calls when choosing between simple calls broadcast after a delay. This effect occurred for calls with multiple chucks, but not with single chucks. Neither motivation nor orientation behavior differed with chuck number, suggesting that results are due to differential memory. Thus, female memory could favor the evolution of increasing signal complexity through sexual selection. 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20206525     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.01.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  13 in total

1.  Receiver psychology turns 20: is it time for a broader approach?

Authors:  Cory T Miller; Mark A Bee
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 2.844

2.  Relative comparisons of call parameters enable auditory grouping in frogs.

Authors:  Hamilton E Farris; Michael J Ryan
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 3.  The current and future state of animal coloration research.

Authors:  John A Endler; Johanna Mappes
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Nonlinear acoustic complexity in a fish 'two-voice' system.

Authors:  Aaron N Rice; Bruce R Land; Andrew H Bass
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Female túngara frogs do not experience the continuity illusion.

Authors:  Alexander T Baugh; Michael J Ryan; Ximena E Bernal; A Stanley Rand; Mark A Bee
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 1.912

6.  A lateralized functional auditory network is involved in anuran sexual selection.

Authors:  Fei Xue; Guangzhan Fang; Xizi Yue; Ermi Zhao; Steven E Brauth; Yezhong Tang
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.826

7.  Vasotocin induces sexually dimorphic effects on acoustically-guided behavior in a tropical frog.

Authors:  Alexander T Baugh; Michael J Ryan
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Progesterone and prostaglandin F2α induce species-typical female preferences for male sexual displays in Cope's gray treefrog (Hyla chrysoscelis).

Authors:  Jessica L Ward; Elliot K Love; Alexander T Baugh; Noah M Gordon; Jessie C Tanner; Mark A Bee
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2015-10-08

9.  Mating signals indicating sexual receptiveness induce unique spatio-temporal EEG theta patterns in an anuran species.

Authors:  Guangzhan Fang; Ping Yang; Jianguo Cui; Dezhong Yao; Steven E Brauth; Yezhong Tang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Male-male competition and female choice are differentially affected by male call acoustics in the serrate-legged small treefrog, Kurixalus odontotarsus.

Authors:  Bicheng Zhu; Jichao Wang; Longhui Zhao; Qinghua Chen; Zhixin Sun; Yue Yang; Steven E Brauth; Yezhong Tang; Jianguo Cui
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.