Literature DB >> 21810544

A Markov model to analyze cost-effectiveness of screening for severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID).

Kee Chan1, Joie Davis, Sung-Yun Pai, Francisco A Bonilla, Jennifer M Puck, Michael Apkon.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of universal neonatal screening for T cell lymphocytopenia in enhancing quality of life and life expectancy for children with severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID).
METHODS: Decision trees were created and analyzed to estimate the cost, life years, and quality adjusted life years (QALYs) across a population when universal screening for lack of T cells is used to detect SCID, as implemented in five states, compared to detection based on recognizing symptoms and signs of disease. Terminal values of each tree limb were derived through Markov models simulating the natural history of three cohorts: unaffected subjects; those diagnosed with SCID as neonates (early diagnosis); and those diagnosed after becoming symptomatic and arousing clinical suspicion (late diagnosis). Models considered the costs of screening and of care including hematopoietic cell transplantation for affected individuals. Key decision variables were derived from the literature and from a survey of families with children affected by SCID, which was used to describe the clinical history and healthcare utilization for affected subjects. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to explore the influence of these decision variables.
RESULTS: Over a 70-year time horizon, the average cost per infant was $8.89 without screening and $14.33 with universal screening. The model predicted that universal screening in the U.S. would cost approximately $22.4 million/year with a gain of 880 life years and 802 QALYs. Sensitivity analyses showed that screening test specificity and disease incidence were critical driving forces affecting the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Assuming a SCID incidence of 1/75,000 births and test specificity and sensitivity each at 0.99, screening remained cost-effective up to a maximum cost of $15 per infant screened.
CONCLUSION: At our current estimated screening cost of $4.22/infant, universal screening for SCID would be a cost effective means to improve quality and duration of life for children with SCID. Copyright Â
© 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21810544      PMCID: PMC3205197          DOI: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2011.07.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Genet Metab        ISSN: 1096-7192            Impact factor:   4.797


  36 in total

1.  Representing uncertainty: the role of cost-effectiveness acceptability curves.

Authors:  E Fenwick; K Claxton; M Sculpher
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  Neonatal diagnosis of severe combined immunodeficiency leads to significantly improved survival outcome: the case for newborn screening.

Authors:  Lucinda Brown; Jinhua Xu-Bayford; Zoe Allwood; Mary Slatter; Andrew Cant; E Graham Davies; Paul Veys; Andrew R Gennery; H Bobby Gaspar
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  High-throughput multiplexed T-cell-receptor excision circle quantitative PCR assay with internal controls for detection of severe combined immunodeficiency in population-based newborn screening.

Authors:  Jacalyn L Gerstel-Thompson; Jonathan F Wilkey; Jennifer C Baptiste; Jennifer S Navas; Sung-Yun Pai; Kenneth A Pass; Roger B Eaton; Anne Marie Comeau
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 8.327

4.  From public health emergency to public health service: the implications of evolving criteria for newborn screening panels.

Authors:  Scott D Grosse; Coleen A Boyle; Aileen Kenneson; Muin J Khoury; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for severe combined immunodeficiency in the neonatal period leads to superior thymic output and improved survival.

Authors:  Laurie A Myers; Dhavalkumar D Patel; Jennifer M Puck; Rebecca H Buckley
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 6.  Recommendations of the Panel on Cost-effectiveness in Health and Medicine.

Authors:  M C Weinstein; J E Siegel; M R Gold; M S Kamlet; L B Russell
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-10-16       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Two-tiered universal newborn screening strategy for severe combined immunodeficiency.

Authors:  Sean A McGhee; E Richard Stiehm; Morton Cowan; Paul Krogstad; Edward R B McCabe
Journal:  Mol Genet Metab       Date:  2005-11-02       Impact factor: 4.797

8.  Development of a routine newborn screening protocol for severe combined immunodeficiency.

Authors:  Mei W Baker; William J Grossman; Ronald H Laessig; Gary L Hoffman; Charles D Brokopp; Daniel F Kurtycz; Michael F Cogley; Thomas J Litsheim; Murray L Katcher; John M Routes
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2009-05-31       Impact factor: 10.793

9.  Cognitive and behavioral abnormalities in children after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for severe congenital immunodeficiencies.

Authors:  Penny Titman; Elizabeth Pink; Emily Skucek; Katherine O'Hanlon; Tim J Cole; Jane Gaspar; Jinhua Xu-Bayford; Alison Jones; Adrian J Thrasher; E Graham Davies; Paul A Veys; H Bobby Gaspar
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2008-07-21       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 10.  Advances in the understanding and treatment of human severe combined immunodeficiency.

Authors:  R H Buckley
Journal:  Immunol Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.505

View more
  34 in total

1.  Neonatal screening for severe combined immunodeficiency.

Authors:  Jennifer M Puck
Journal:  Curr Opin Pediatr       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.856

Review 2.  The long quest for neonatal screening for severe combined immunodeficiency.

Authors:  Rebecca H Buckley
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 10.793

3.  A public health economic assessment of hospitals' cost to screen newborns for critical congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Cora Peterson; Scott D Grosse; Jill Glidewell; Lorraine F Garg; Kim Van Naarden Braun; Mary M Knapp; Leslie M Beres; Cynthia F Hinton; Richard S Olney; Cynthia H Cassell
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 4.  History and current status of newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency.

Authors:  Antonia Kwan; Jennifer M Puck
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 3.300

Review 5.  Newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency and T-cell lymphopenia.

Authors:  Jennifer M Puck
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 12.988

6.  Fiscal implications of newborn screening in the diagnosis of severe combined immunodeficiency.

Authors:  Catherine Kubiak; Soma Jyonouchi; Caroline Kuo; Maria Garcia-Lloret; Morna J Dorsey; John Sleasman; Arthur S Zbrozek; Elena E Perez
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract       Date:  2014-08-28

7.  An analysis and decision tool to measure cost benefit of newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) and related T-cell lymphopenia.

Authors:  Vicki Modell; Megan Knaus; Fred Modell
Journal:  Immunol Res       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.829

8.  The Use of Economic Evaluation to Inform Newborn Screening Policy Decisions: The Washington State Experience.

Authors:  Scott D Grosse; John D Thompson; Yao Ding; Michael Glass
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 4.911

9.  Genetics professionals' opinions of whole-genome sequencing in the newborn period.

Authors:  Elizabeth Ulm; W Gregory Feero; Richard Dineen; Joel Charrow; Catherine Wicklund
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases in Saudi Arabia: a Tertiary Care Hospital Experience over a Period of Three Years (2010-2013).

Authors:  Bandar Al-Saud; Hamoud Al-Mousa; Sulaiman Al Gazlan; Abdulaziz Al-Ghonaium; Rand Arnaout; Amal Al-Seraihy; Sahar Elshorbagi; Nazeema Elsayed; Jawad Afzal; Hasan Al-Dhekri; Saleh Al-Muhsen
Journal:  J Clin Immunol       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 8.317

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.