Literature DB >> 27265561

The Use of Economic Evaluation to Inform Newborn Screening Policy Decisions: The Washington State Experience.

Scott D Grosse1, John D Thompson2, Yao Ding3, Michael Glass2,4.   

Abstract

POLICY POINTS: Newborn screening not only saves lives but can also yield net societal economic benefit, in addition to benefits such as improved quality of life to affected individuals and families. Calculations of net economic benefit from newborn screening include the monetary equivalent of avoided deaths and reductions in costs of care for complications associated with late-diagnosed individuals minus the additional costs of screening, diagnosis, and treatment associated with prompt diagnosis. Since 2001 the Washington State Department of Health has successfully implemented an approach to conducting evidence-based economic evaluations of disorders proposed for addition to the state-mandated newborn screening panel. CONTEXT: Economic evaluations can inform policy decisions on the expansion of newborn screening panels. This article documents the use of cost-benefit models in Washington State as part of the rule-making process that resulted in the implementation of screening for medium-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase (MCAD) deficiency and 4 other metabolic disorders in 2004, cystic fibrosis (CF) in 2006, 15 other metabolic disorders in 2008, and severe combined immune deficiency (SCID) in 2014.
METHODS: We reviewed Washington State Department of Health internal reports and spreadsheet models of expected net societal benefit of adding disorders to the state newborn screening panel. We summarize the assumptions and findings for 2 models (MCAD and CF) and discuss them in relation to findings in the peer-reviewed literature.
FINDINGS: The MCAD model projected a benefit-cost ratio of 3.4 to 1 based on assumptions of a 20.0 percentage point reduction in infant mortality and a 13.9 percentage point reduction in serious developmental disability. The CF model projected a benefit-cost ratio of 4.0-5.4 to 1 for a discount rate of 3%-4% and a plausible range of 1-2 percentage point reductions in deaths up to age 10 years.
CONCLUSIONS: The Washington State cost-benefit models of newborn screening were broadly consistent with peer-reviewed literature, and their findings of net benefit appear to be robust to uncertainty in parameters. Public health newborn screening programs can develop their own capacity to project expected costs and benefits of expansion of newborn screening panels, although it would be most efficient if this capacity were shared among programs.
© 2016 Milbank Memorial Fund.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MCAD deficiency; cost-benefit analysis; cystic fibrosis; economics; neonatal screening

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27265561      PMCID: PMC4911729          DOI: 10.1111/1468-0009.12196

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Milbank Q        ISSN: 0887-378X            Impact factor:   4.911


  72 in total

Review 1.  Population screening in the age of genomic medicine.

Authors:  Muin J Khoury; Linda L McCabe; Edward R B McCabe
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-01-02       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  A decision-tree approach to cost comparison of newborn screening strategies for cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Janelle Wells; Marjorie Rosenberg; Gary Hoffman; Michael Anstead; Philip M Farrell
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  Cost-effectiveness of 4 neonatal screening strategies for cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  M Elske van den Akker-van Marle; Hinke M Dankert; Paul H Verkerk; Jeannette E Dankert-Roelse
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Measuring the value of public health systems.

Authors:  David R Holtgrave
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Measuring the value of public health systems: the disconnect between health economists and public health practitioners.

Authors:  Peter J Neumann; Peter D Jacobson; Jennifer A Palmer
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Projected costs, risks, and benefits of expanded newborn screening for MCADD.

Authors:  Lisa A Prosser; Chung Yin Kong; Donna Rusinak; Susan L Waisbren
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 7.  Neonatal screening for inborn errors of metabolism: cost, yield and outcome.

Authors:  R J Pollitt; A Green; C J McCabe; A Booth; N J Cooper; J V Leonard; J Nicholl; P Nicholson; J R Tunaley; N K Virdi
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.014

8.  Comprehensive cost-utility analysis of newborn screening strategies.

Authors:  Aaron E Carroll; Stephen M Downs
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 9.  Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis: evaluation of benefits and risks and recommendations for state newborn screening programs.

Authors:  Scott D Grosse; Coleen A Boyle; Jeffrey R Botkin; Anne Marie Comeau; Martin Kharrazi; Margaret Rosenfeld; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  2004-10-15

10.  Cost-effectiveness of routine screening for critical congenital heart disease in US newborns.

Authors:  Cora Peterson; Scott D Grosse; Matthew E Oster; Richard S Olney; Cynthia H Cassell
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 7.124

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Monetary Valuation of Children's Cognitive Outcomes in Economic Evaluations from a Societal Perspective: A Review.

Authors:  Scott D Grosse; Ying Zhou
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-29

2.  The Cost-Effectiveness of Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia Newborn Screening in Brazil: A Comparison Between Screened and Unscreened Cohorts.

Authors:  Mirela Costa de Miranda; Luciana Bertocco de Paiva Haddad; Evelinda Trindade; Alex Cassenote; Giselle Y Hayashi; Durval Damiani; Fernanda Cavalieri Costa; Guiomar Madureira; Berenice Bilharinho de Mendonca; Tania A S S Bachega
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 3.418

Review 3.  Data Needs for Economic Evaluations of Screening in Pediatric Primary Care: A Research Framework.

Authors:  Scott D Grosse; Alex R Kemper; Lisa A Prosser
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 9.703

4.  What Contribution Did Economic Evidence Make to the Adoption of Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Policies in the United States?

Authors:  Scott D Grosse; Craig A Mason; Marcus Gaffney; Vickie Thomson; Karl R White
Journal:  Int J Neonatal Screen       Date:  2018-07-20

5.  Economic Evaluation of Newborn Screening for Severe Combined Immunodeficiency.

Authors:  Sophy T F Shih; Elena Keller; Veronica Wiley; Melanie Wong; Michelle A Farrar; Georgina M Chambers
Journal:  Int J Neonatal Screen       Date:  2022-07-20

6.  Modelling the Cost-Effectiveness and Budget Impact of a Newborn Screening Program for Spinal Muscular Atrophy and Severe Combined Immunodeficiency.

Authors:  Sophy T F Shih; Elena Keller; Veronica Wiley; Michelle A Farrar; Melanie Wong; Georgina M Chambers
Journal:  Int J Neonatal Screen       Date:  2022-07-20

Review 7.  Population-based screening of newborns: Findings from the newborn screening expansion study (part two).

Authors:  Kee Chan; Amy Brower; Marc S Williams
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 4.772

8.  Cost and Cost-Effectiveness Assessments of Newborn Screening for Critical Congenital Heart Disease Using Pulse Oximetry: A Review.

Authors:  Scott D Grosse; Cora Peterson; Rahi Abouk; Jill Glidewell; Matthew E Oster
Journal:  Int J Neonatal Screen       Date:  2017-12-14

9.  Adverse Outcomes and Economic Burden of Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia Late Diagnosis in the Newborn Screening Absence.

Authors:  Mirela Costa De Miranda; Luciana Bertocco De Paiva Haddad; Guiomar Madureira; Berenice Bilharinho De Mendonca; Tania A S S Bachega
Journal:  J Endocr Soc       Date:  2019-11-21

10.  Simple Test, Complex System: Multifaceted Views of Newborn Screening Science, Technology, and Policy.

Authors:  Kee Chan; Michael Petros
Journal:  Glob Pediatr Health       Date:  2019-12-20
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.