BACKGROUND: Real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) targeting a specific marker of functional T cells, the T-cell-receptor excision circle (TREC), detects the absence of functional T cells and has a demonstrated clinical validity for detecting severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) in infants. There is need for a qPCR TREC assay with an internal control to monitor DNA quality and the relative cellular content of the particular dried blood spot punch sampled in each reaction. The utility of the qPCR TREC assay would also be far improved if more tests could be performed on the same newborn screening sample. METHODS: We approached the multiplexing of qPCR for TREC by attenuating the reaction for the reference gene, with focus on maintaining tight quality assurance for reproducible slopes and for prevention of sample-to-sample cross contamination. Statewide newborn screening for SCID using the multiplexed assay was implemented, and quality-assurance data were recorded. RESULTS: The multiplex qPCR TREC assay showed nearly 100% amplification efficiency for each of the TREC and reference sequences, clinical validity for multiple forms of SCID, and an analytic limit of detection consistent with prevention of contamination. The eluate and residual ghost from a 3.2-mm dried blood spot could be used as source material for multiplexed immunoassays and multiplexed DNA tests (Multiplex Plus), with no disruption to the multiplex TREC qPCR. CONCLUSIONS: Population-based SCID newborn screening programs should consider multiplexing for quality assurance purposes. Potential benefits of using Multiplex Plus include the ability to perform multianalyte profiling.
BACKGROUND: Real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) targeting a specific marker of functional T cells, the T-cell-receptor excision circle (TREC), detects the absence of functional T cells and has a demonstrated clinical validity for detecting severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) in infants. There is need for a qPCR TREC assay with an internal control to monitor DNA quality and the relative cellular content of the particular dried blood spot punch sampled in each reaction. The utility of the qPCR TREC assay would also be far improved if more tests could be performed on the same newborn screening sample. METHODS: We approached the multiplexing of qPCR for TREC by attenuating the reaction for the reference gene, with focus on maintaining tight quality assurance for reproducible slopes and for prevention of sample-to-sample cross contamination. Statewide newborn screening for SCID using the multiplexed assay was implemented, and quality-assurance data were recorded. RESULTS: The multiplex qPCR TREC assay showed nearly 100% amplification efficiency for each of the TREC and reference sequences, clinical validity for multiple forms of SCID, and an analytic limit of detection consistent with prevention of contamination. The eluate and residual ghost from a 3.2-mm dried blood spot could be used as source material for multiplexed immunoassays and multiplexed DNA tests (Multiplex Plus), with no disruption to the multiplex TREC qPCR. CONCLUSIONS: Population-based SCID newborn screening programs should consider multiplexing for quality assurance purposes. Potential benefits of using Multiplex Plus include the ability to perform multianalyte profiling.
Authors: Kee Chan; Joie Davis; Sung-Yun Pai; Francisco A Bonilla; Jennifer M Puck; Michael Apkon Journal: Mol Genet Metab Date: 2011-07-12 Impact factor: 4.797
Authors: Marie A P Audrain; Alexandra J C Léger; Caroline A F Hémont; Sophie M Mirallié; David Cheillan; Marie G M Rimbert; Aurélie M-P Le Thuaut; Véronique A Sébille-Rivain; Aurore Prat; Enora M Q Pinel; Eléonore Divry; Cécile G L Dert; Maxime A G Fournier; Caroline J C Thomas Journal: J Clin Immunol Date: 2018-09-24 Impact factor: 8.317
Authors: Kiran A Gul; Torstein Øverland; Liv Osnes; Lars O Baumbusch; Rolf D Pettersen; Kari Lima; Tore G Abrahamsen Journal: J Clin Immunol Date: 2015-03-27 Impact factor: 8.317
Authors: Federica Cattaneo; Mike Recher; Stefania Masneri; Sachin N Baxi; Claudia Fiorini; Francesca Antonelli; Christian A Wysocki; Jose G Calderon; Hermann Eibel; Angela R Smith; Francisco A Bonilla; Erdyni Tsitsikov; Silvia Giliani; Luigi D Notarangelo; Sung-Yun Pai Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2013-02-04 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Beth H Vogel; Vincent Bonagura; Geoffrey A Weinberg; Mark Ballow; Jason Isabelle; Lisa DiAntonio; April Parker; Allison Young; Charlotte Cunningham-Rundles; Chin-To Fong; Jocelyn Celestin; Heather Lehman; Arye Rubinstein; Subhadra Siegel; Leonard Weiner; Carlos Saavedra-Matiz; Denise M Kay; Michele Caggana Journal: J Clin Immunol Date: 2014-03-01 Impact factor: 8.317