Literature DB >> 15869919

Varying contributions of growth and ageing to racial and sex differences in femoral neck structure and strength in old age.

Xiao-Fang Wang1, Yunbo Duan, Thomas J Beck, Ego Seeman.   

Abstract

The structural basis of racial and sex differences in femoral neck (FN) fragility in old age was assessed in a cross-sectional study of 829 healthy Chinese and 1181 healthy Caucasian subjects aged 18 to 93 years in Melbourne, Australia. We measured FN bone mineral density (BMD), periosteal diameter, and estimated endocortical diameter, cortical thickness, volumetric BMD (vBMD), section modulus, and buckling ratio using dual X-ray absorptiometry. Racial and sex differences in structural and strength indices were adjusted for age, bone length and body weight and were expressed in standard deviation (SD) unit. In young adulthood, Chinese women had a 0.85 SD narrower FN, a 0.47 SD thinner cortex and a 0.79 SD shorter FN axis length (FNAL) than Caucasian women. Across age, Chinese and Caucasian women had similar increments in endocortical and periosteal diameters and similar decrements in cortical thickness and vBMD (both approximately 20%). In young adult males, FN periosteal diameter did not differ by race, but cortical thickness was 0.35 SD lower in Chinese than Caucasians. Across age, increments in periosteal and endocortical diameters were less in Chinese than Caucasian men so cortical thickness and vBMD diminished less in Chinese than in Caucasian men. In both races, young adult women had narrower FN than men. As Chinese women had a greater increment in periosteal diameter than Chinese men across age, the sex difference in FN periosteal diameter established in young adulthood diminished in old age. As Caucasian men had a greater increment in periosteal diameter than Caucasian women, the sex difference in FN periosteal diameter established in young adulthood increased with age. In old age, for both sexes, Chinese had a higher fracture risk in bending than Caucasians, but a lower fracture risk by buckling. For both races, women had a higher fracture risk in bending than men. Racial and sexual dimorphism in the absolute and relative behavior of the periosteal and endocortical surfaces throughout life produce race- and sex-specific differences in FN size, cortical thickness, and indices of bone strength in old age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15869919     DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2004.11.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  40 in total

1.  Sexual dimorphism of femoral neck cross-sectional bone geometry in athletes and non-athletes: a hip structural analysis study.

Authors:  Karen Hind; Lisa Gannon; Emma Whatley; Carlton Cooke
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Effects of raloxifene treatment on the structural geometry of the proximal femur in Japanese women with osteoporosis.

Authors:  Junichi Takada; Takami Miki; Yasuo Imanishi; Kiyoshi Nakatsuka; Hiroshi Wada; Hiroshi Naka; Takashi Yoshizaki; Kousuke Iba; Thomas J Beck; Toshihiko Yamashita
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Age-related trends in hip geometry in Sri Lankan women: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Sarath Lekamwasam; Janaka Lenora
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2007-10-25       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  A local reference frame for describing the proximal human femur: application in clinical settings.

Authors:  Milad Masjedi; Charison Tay; Simon J Harris; Justin P Cobb
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Variation in childhood skeletal robustness is an important determinant of cortical area in young adults.

Authors:  Siddharth Bhola; Julia Chen; Joseph Fusco; G Felipe Duarte; Nelly Andarawis-Puri; Richard Ghillani; Karl J Jepsen
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2011-07-23       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  Bone cross-sectional geometry in male runners, gymnasts, swimmers and non-athletic controls: a hip-structural analysis study.

Authors:  Karen Hind; Lisa Gannon; Emma Whatley; Carlton Cooke; John Truscott
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Thinking inside and outside the envelopes of bone: dedicated to PDD.

Authors:  P Szulc; E Seeman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 8.  Bone fragility in men--where are we?

Authors:  E Seeman; G Bianchi; S Khosla; J A Kanis; E Orwoll
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  External Bone Size Is a Key Determinant of Strength-Decline Trajectories of Aging Male Radii.

Authors:  Erin Mr Bigelow; Daniella M Patton; Ferrous S Ward; Antonio Ciarelli; Michael Casden; Andrea Clark; Robert W Goulet; Michael D Morris; Stephen H Schlecht; Gurjit S Mandair; Todd L Bredbenner; David H Kohn; Karl J Jepsen
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Race/ethnic differences in bone mineral densities in older men.

Authors:  H-S Nam; M-H Shin; J M Zmuda; P C Leung; E Barrett-Connor; E S Orwoll; J A Cauley
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.