Literature DB >> 9467541

Familial resemblance for bone mineral mass is expressed before puberty.

S Ferrari1, R Rizzoli, D Slosman, J P Bonjour.   

Abstract

Genetic factors are known to explain a major proportion of peak bone mineral mass variance. Whether the influence of these genetic factors is expressed before the pubertal bone mineral mass accrual and whether there is tracking of bone mineral mass during pubertal growth, however, are not clearly established. We prospectively investigated correlations for bone mineral content (BMC), density, and bone size between prepubertal daughters and their premenopausal mothers. Height, weight, lumbar spine (LS), femoral neck (FN) and mid-femoral diaphysis BMC, bone area (BA), areal bone mineral density (aBMD), and volumetric bone mineral apparent density (BMAD) were evaluated in 138 mothers (mean age +/- SD, 40.0 +/- 4.0 yr) and their daughters (8.1 +/- 0.7 yr), who were then remeasured at yearly intervals for 2 yr. Eight-year-old prepubertal daughters had reached 78% and 44% of their mothers' height and weight, respectively. At the various skeletal sites, they had reached 33-43% of their mothers' BMC, 47-69% of their BA, 59-78% of their aBMD, and 75-105% of their BMAD. All body size and bone traits (age-adjusted Z-scores) were significantly correlated between prepubertal daughters and their mothers (r: 0.22-0.36, P < 0.01), except midfemoral diaphysis BMAD. Heritability estimates (1/2 h2), after adjustment for body size and dietary calcium intake, showed that 18-37% of bone traits were directly determined by maternal descent. During the next 2 yr, growth was accompanied by a marked increase of BMC, aBMD, and BA, whereas BMAD changed very little. In contrast, during this period, there were only minor changes in body size or bone trait Z-scores (i.e. < 0.5 Z-scores), which were thus highly correlated between consecutive measurements (r: 0.75-0.92, P < 0.0001). Accordingly, mother-daughter correlations remained unchanged over that period. Although more than 60% of peak bone mineral mass is gained during puberty (mostly at the expense of an increase in bone size while volumetric bone density slightly changes), familial resemblance for most bone traits is already present between daughters and their mothers before puberty. In the girls, moreover, yearly measurements were highly correlated, suggesting tracking of bone traits during pubertal growth. These results indicate that genetic susceptibility to osteoporosis may already be detectable in early childhood.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9467541     DOI: 10.1210/jcem.83.2.4583

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 0021-972X            Impact factor:   5.958


  61 in total

1.  Metabolic bone disease in human immunodeficiency virus-infected children.

Authors:  Stephen Arpadi; Mary Horlick; Elizabeth Shane
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 2.  The Effect of Swimming During Childhood and Adolescence on Bone Mineral Density: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Alejandro Gomez-Bruton; Jesús Montero-Marín; Alejandro González-Agüero; Javier García-Campayo; Luis A Moreno; Jose A Casajús; Germán Vicente-Rodríguez
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Genetic and environmental influences on bone mineral density in pre- and post-menopausal women.

Authors:  Lillian B Brown; Elizabeth A Streeten; Jay R Shapiro; Daniel McBride; Alan R Shuldiner; Patricia A Peyser; Braxton D Mitchell
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-07-05       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Influence of maternal genetic and lifestyle factors on bone mineral density in adolescent daughters: a cohort study in 387 Japanese daughter-mother pairs.

Authors:  Tatsuhiko Kuroda; Yoshiko Onoe; Yuko Miyabara; Remi Yoshikata; Seiya Orito; Ken Ishitani; Hiroya Okano; Hiroaki Ohta
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Variation in childhood skeletal robustness is an important determinant of cortical area in young adults.

Authors:  Siddharth Bhola; Julia Chen; Joseph Fusco; G Felipe Duarte; Nelly Andarawis-Puri; Richard Ghillani; Karl J Jepsen
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2011-07-23       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 6.  Systems analysis of bone.

Authors:  Karl J Jepsen
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug

7.  DMP-1-mediated Ghr gene recombination compromises skeletal development and impairs skeletal response to intermittent PTH.

Authors:  Zhongbo Liu; Oran D Kennedy; Luis Cardoso; Jelena Basta-Pljakic; Nicola C Partridge; Mitchell B Schaffler; Clifford J Rosen; Shoshana Yakar
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  The effect of behavioural risk factors on osteoporosis in Irish women.

Authors:  N M Cummins; P M Jakeman; I Sestak; N Murphy; P Carroll
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2012-07-28       Impact factor: 1.568

9.  Polymorphisms in the low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5 (LRP5) gene are associated with variation in vertebral bone mass, vertebral bone size, and stature in whites.

Authors:  Serge L Ferrari; Samuel Deutsch; Urmila Choudhury; Thierry Chevalley; Jean-Philippe Bonjour; Emmanouil T Dermitzakis; Rene Rizzoli; Stylianos E Antonarakis
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2004-04-07       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 10.  Maternal diet, behaviour and offspring skeletal health.

Authors:  Laura R Goodfellow; Susannah Earl; Cyrus Cooper; Nicholas C Harvey
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2010-04-16       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.