Literature DB >> 2180780

Comparison of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of focal hepatic lesions.

J A Barakos1, H I Goldberg, J J Brown, T J Gilbert.   

Abstract

Two combined magnetic resonance (MR) spin-echo pulse sequences at 0.35 T were compared with dynamic bolus contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) in the evaluation of focal hepatic lesions. Each combined MR sequence was performed in a separate group of patients. The first group consisted of 76 patients in whom a moderately T1-weighted sequence (spin echo [SE] 500/30 [repetition time/echo time]) was combined with a T2-weighted sequence (SE 2000/60). In the second group, consisting of 68 patients, a more heavily T1-weighted sequence (SE 250/15) was combined with the T2-weighted sequence. All studies were evaluated in a retrospective blinded fashion, with construction of receiver operating characteristic curves. We conclude that, in detection of patients with one or more focal hepatic lesions, either combined MR sequence was comparable to CT. In the detection of individual hepatic lesions, the sensitivity of the combined MR sequence with a moderately T1-weighted sequence (SE 500/30 and 2000/60) was essentially equivalent to CT (79 vs 77%, respectively). Additionally, a combined MR sequence with a heavily T1-weighted pulse sequence (SE 250/15 and 2000/60) was not statistically different than CT (86 vs 80%, respectively). These findings were supported by the receiver operating characteristic analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2180780     DOI: 10.1007/BF01888748

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2356


  29 in total

1.  Rapid MR imaging with suspended respiration: clinical application in the liver.

Authors:  R R Edelman; P F Hahn; R Buxton; J Wittenberg; J T Ferrucci; S Saini; T J Brady
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Improved detection of focal lesions with computerized tomographic examination of the liver using ethiodized oil emulsion (EOE-13) liver contrast.

Authors:  P H Sugarbaker; M Vermess; J L Doppman; D L Miller; R Simon
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1984-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Hepatic metastases in perspective.

Authors:  M A Adson
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Multiple NMR T2 relaxation values in human liver tissue.

Authors:  M E Bernardino; W Small; J Goldstein; C W Sewell; P J Sones; K Gedgaudas-McClees; J T Galambos; J Wenger; W J Casarella
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  The effect of motion on two-dimensional Fourier transformation magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  C L Schultz; R J Alfidi; A D Nelson; S Y Kopiwoda; M E Clampitt
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Hepatic metastases: randomized, controlled comparison of detection with MR imaging and CT.

Authors:  D D Stark; J Wittenberg; R J Butch; J T Ferrucci
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Hepatic metastases studied with MR and CT.

Authors:  J P Heiken; J K Lee; H S Glazer; D Ling
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  MR image contrast and relaxation times of solid tumors in the chest, abdomen, and pelvis.

Authors:  H C Schmidt; D Tscholakoff; H Hricak; C B Higgins
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1985 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.826

9.  Leo J. Rigler lecture. MR imaging of the liver.

Authors:  J T Ferrucci
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Hepatic tumors: magnetic resonance and CT appearance.

Authors:  A A Moss; H I Goldberg; D B Stark; P L Davis; A R Margulis; L Kaufman; L E Crooks
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  7 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance imaging in oncology.

Authors:  J E Husband; R Guy
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Staging of hepatocellular carcinoma by ultrasonography, computed tomography, and angiography: the role of CT combined with arterial portography.

Authors:  F Garbagnati; C Spreafico; A Marchianò; M Salvetti; C Segura; G Piragine
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1991

3.  Diagnostic performance of MDCT, PET/CT and gadoxetic acid (Primovist(®))-enhanced MRI in patients with colorectal liver metastases being considered for hepatic resection: initial experience in a single centre.

Authors:  V O Chan; J P Das; J F Gerstenmaier; J Geoghegan; R G Gibney; C D Collins; S J Skehan; D E Malone
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2012-03-17       Impact factor: 1.568

4.  Laser-induced thermotherapy combined with hepatic arterial embolization in the treatment of liver tumors in a rat tumor model.

Authors:  C T Germer; C Isbert; D Albrecht; A Roggan; J Pelz; J P Ritz; G Müller; H J Buhr
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Preoperative evaluation of patients for liver resection. Appropriate CT imaging.

Authors:  R C Karl; S S Morse; R D Halpert; R A Clark
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 6.  Surgical therapy for colorectal metastases to the liver.

Authors:  Timothy M Pawlik; Michael A Choti
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  MR imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma at 1.5 Tesla.

Authors:  R E Rosenthal; P L Davis
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1992
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.