Literature DB >> 3490743

Leo J. Rigler lecture. MR imaging of the liver.

J T Ferrucci.   

Abstract

Recent technical and clinical advances in MR of the liver are reviewed with special reference to the role of MR as a primary screening technique for detection of space-occupying lesions, especially metastases. The major current problem in upper abdominal MR imaging is physiologic motions, and this appears to have been effectively solved by newly introduced pulse-sequence and timing-parameter strategies. Short-TR/TE spin-echo sequences with extensive signal averaging and heavy T1-weighting produce images with exceptional anatomic detail and liver-cancer contrast differences. With this sequence superior sensitivity for liver-cancer detection has been shown in quantitative signal-difference to noise comparisons with other pulse sequences and in clinical comparisons with CT. MR discovered 14% more individual metastases and 3% more patients with liver cancer than CT in a blinded comparative study of 142 patients undergoing both exams. MR also showed greater specificity (98%) than CT (91%) in distinguishing patients without liver metastases. Differentiation of hemangioma from metastases was possible with greater than 90% specificity by using heavily T2-weighted sequences. Use of a fast-scan, gradient-recalled echo technique can also produce good-quality, multislice, T1-weighted studies of the liver in 20 sec--a breath-hold. MR contrast agents (such as gadolinium-DTPA and reticuloendothelial-system-specific, superparamagnetic ferrite-iron-oxide particles) offer further promise for enhanced sensitivity for liver-cancer detection. When optimal pulse sequences are employed, MR can now be appropriate as a primary screening method for detecting liver neoplasms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3490743     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.147.6.1103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  9 in total

Review 1.  Abdominal magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  T M Harris; M D Cohen
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  1989

2.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the liver by oblique sections.

Authors:  J Champetier; J F Le Bas; H Haouari; P Chaffanjon
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the liver.

Authors:  A A Moss
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1987-11

4.  Accumulation of iron oxide particles around liver metastases during MR imaging.

Authors:  P F Hahn; D D Stark; J T Ferrucci
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1992

5.  Comparative study between ultrasound, computed tomography, intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography, and magnetic resonance imaging in the differentiation of tumors of the liver.

Authors:  L Vlachos; S Trakadas; A Gouliamos; S Lazarou; D Mourikis; R Ioannou; A Kalovidouris; C Papavasiliou
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1990

6.  Comparison of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of focal hepatic lesions.

Authors:  J A Barakos; H I Goldberg; J J Brown; T J Gilbert
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1990

7.  Magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of tumors of the liver.

Authors:  Y Kinami; H Yokota; M Takata; S Takashima; I Yamamoto
Journal:  Gastroenterol Jpn       Date:  1988-04

Review 8.  Neuroendocrine metastases of the liver.

Authors:  I Ihse; B Persson; S Tibblin
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1995 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Polymer-brush-afforded SPIO Nanoparticles Show a Unique Biodistribution and MR Imaging Contrast in Mouse Organs.

Authors:  Ting Chen; Yuki Mori; Chizuko Inui-Yamamoto; Yutaka Komai; Yoshiyuki Tago; Shinichi Yoshida; Yoshitsugu Takabatake; Yoshitaka Isaka; Kohji Ohno; Yoshichika Yoshioka
Journal:  Magn Reson Med Sci       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 2.471

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.