Literature DB >> 4011905

Hepatic metastases studied with MR and CT.

J P Heiken, J K Lee, H S Glazer, D Ling.   

Abstract

Examinations of the liver using magnetic resonance (MR) and computed tomography (CT) were performed on 50 patients with hepatic metastases. MR and CT were comparable in their ability to detect metastases, which generally appeared hypointense compared with normal liver parenchyma on T1-weighted MR images and hyperintense on T2-weighted images. The MR imaging techniques that were most reliable in detecting metastases were inversion recovery and a relatively T2-weighted, spin-echo technique (TR = 1,500 msec, TE = 60 msec). We conclude that CT, because of its shorter imaging time, greater spatial resolution, and lower cost, should remain the preferred screening test for hepatic metastases. MR imaging should be reserved for patients with equivocal CT findings and for patients in whom there is persistent clinical suspicion of hepatic metastases despite a negative CT examination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4011905     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.156.2.4011905

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  8 in total

1.  Focal hepatic lesions: detection by dynamic and delayed computed tomography versus short TE/TR spin echo and fast field echo magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  R C Nelson; J L Chezmar; H V Steinberg; W E Torres; B R Baumgartner; R K Gedgaudas-McClees; M E Bernardino
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1988

Review 2.  Hepatobiliary MR imaging with gadolinium-based contrast agents.

Authors:  Alex Frydrychowicz; Meghan G Lubner; Jeffrey J Brown; Elmar M Merkle; Scott K Nagle; Neil M Rofsky; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Comparative study between ultrasound, computed tomography, intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography, and magnetic resonance imaging in the differentiation of tumors of the liver.

Authors:  L Vlachos; S Trakadas; A Gouliamos; S Lazarou; D Mourikis; R Ioannou; A Kalovidouris; C Papavasiliou
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1990

4.  Comparison of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of focal hepatic lesions.

Authors:  J A Barakos; H I Goldberg; J J Brown; T J Gilbert
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1990

5.  Preoperative evaluation of patients for liver resection. Appropriate CT imaging.

Authors:  R C Karl; S S Morse; R D Halpert; R A Clark
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Ultrasound, CT, and MRI comparison in primary and secondary tumors of the liver.

Authors:  W L Curati; A Halevy; R N Gibson; D H Carr; L H Blumgart; R E Steiner
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1988

7.  Magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of tumors of the liver.

Authors:  Y Kinami; H Yokota; M Takata; S Takashima; I Yamamoto
Journal:  Gastroenterol Jpn       Date:  1988-04

8.  Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging in medicine.

Authors:  C S McKinstry
Journal:  Ulster Med J       Date:  1986-10
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.