Literature DB >> 6089990

Improved detection of focal lesions with computerized tomographic examination of the liver using ethiodized oil emulsion (EOE-13) liver contrast.

P H Sugarbaker, M Vermess, J L Doppman, D L Miller, R Simon.   

Abstract

A prospective study of computerized tomography (CT) of the liver using a liver contrast agent compared to conventional CT was undertaken. CT scanning without contrast agents (NC-CT), CT with water-soluble contrast (WSC-CT), and CT with ethiodized oil emulsion (EOE-CT) were performed on patients with possible or probable hepatic metastases. The findings on these three examinations were compared to the objective findings at surgery in 53 patients. Accuracy of these examinations was 80.7% for NC-CT, 77.1% for WSC-CT, and 84.9% for EOE-CT. The true-positive percentage for 129 hepatic lesions was 40.6% for the NC-CT, 33.6% for WSC-CT, and 76.7% for the EOE-CT. Eighty-three percent (44/53) of 1- to 2-cm liver lesions were detected by EOE-CT, whereas only 26.4% (14/53) lesions of this size were detected by the NC-CT and 20.4% (10/49) shown by WSC-CT. The likelihood that a lesion seen by CT scan was malignant was 84.6% for NC-CT, 89.4% for WSC-CT, and 81.8% for EOE-CT. The EOE contrast agent improves the sensitivity of liver CT for detecting hepatic metastases. The improvement occurs with lesions 1 cm and greater in diameter, but is particularly striking for lesions of 1 to 2 cm in diameter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6089990     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19841015)54:8<1489::aid-cncr2820540802>3.0.co;2-#

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  9 in total

Review 1.  Resection of liver metastases from a colorectal carcinoma does not benefit the patient.

Authors:  T M Hunt; N Carty; C D Johnson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Liver function tests in patients with computed tomography demonstrated hepatic metastases.

Authors:  M D Ottmar; R L Gonda; K J Leithauser; O H Gutierrez
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1989

3.  Comparison of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of focal hepatic lesions.

Authors:  J A Barakos; H I Goldberg; J J Brown; T J Gilbert
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1990

Review 4.  X-ray-computed tomography contrast agents.

Authors:  Hrvoje Lusic; Mark W Grinstaff
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 60.622

5.  Preoperative staging with computerized axial tomography and biochemical laboratory tests in patients with hepatic metastases.

Authors:  M M Kemeny; J M Hogan; L Ganteaume; D A Goldberg; J J Terz
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Aggressive resection of metastatic disease in selected patients with malignant gastrinoma.

Authors:  J A Norton; P H Sugarbaker; J L Doppman; R A Wesley; P N Maton; J D Gardner; R T Jensen
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 7.  Nanoparticle contrast agents for computed tomography: a focus on micelles.

Authors:  David P Cormode; Pratap C Naha; Zahi A Fayad
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.161

8.  A comparison of methods to measure the percentage hepatic replacement with colorectal metastases.

Authors:  T M Hunt; A D Flowerdew; I Taylor; D M Ackery; R M Blaquiere; K Dewbury
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 9.  CT scanning in carcinoma of the rectum: a review.

Authors:  M P Williams; J E Husband
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 18.000

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.