| Literature DB >> 21806823 |
Stéphane De Mita1, Nathalie Chantret, Karine Loridon, Joëlle Ronfort, Thomas Bataillon.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We studied patterns of molecular adaptation in the wild Mediterranean legume Medicago truncatula. We focused on two phenotypic traits that are not functionally linked: flowering time and perception of symbiotic microbes. Phenology is an important fitness component, especially for annual plants, and many instances of molecular adaptation have been reported for genes involved in flowering pathways. While perception of symbiotic microbes is also integral to adaptation in many plant species, very few reports of molecular adaptation exist for symbiotic genes. Here we used data from 57 individuals and 53 gene fragments to quantify the overall strength of both positive and purifying selection in M. truncatula and asked if footprints of positive selection can be detected at key genes of rhizobia recognition pathways.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21806823 PMCID: PMC3199773 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-11-229
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Evol Biol ISSN: 1471-2148 Impact factor: 3.260
Figure 1Geographic origin of the accessions. Colour-coding refers to the assignation in two groups as inferred using Instruct for K = 2. Group 1 (red) comprises 25 accessions and is broadly distributed geographically. Group 2 (blue) consists of n = 32 accessions.
Summary of nucleotide polymorphism in control gene fragments
| Average Statistic | Whole sample | Group 1 | Group 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of sequences used | 50 | 22 | 28 |
| Number of sites analysed | 1208.27 | 1184.97 | 1217.70 |
| Number of polymorphic sites | 32.46 | 19.27 | 25.03 |
| Watterson's θ& | 0.004421 | 0.003231 | 0.003662 |
| Nucleotide diversity (π)& | 0.003409 | 0.002766 | 0.003185 |
| Tajima's | -0.81 | -0.73 | -0.58 |
| Fu and Wu's | 0.04 | 0.03 | -0.05 |
| 0.156 | N/A | N/A | |
| Hudson's ρ | 0.063 | 0.020 | 0.164 |
All values are given as averages over the 37 control loci.
Group 1 and Group 2 are the two groups inferred using Instruct on sequence data obtained on control loci: Group 2 is the Spain-Morocco group and Group1 the eastern part of the sample (Figure 1)
&: per site estimates are reported here,
#: Z standardization of Fay and Wu's H.
N/A: not applicable.
The value Hudson's ρ reported here is the average of ρ estimates per analysed site.
Figure 2Box plots summarizing patterns of nucleotide variation in . Boxplots (shaded gray) depict the empirical distribution obtained for control fragments. Dots represent individual flowering candidate genes (orange) and symbiotic genes (green). A: Distribution of the scaled mutation rate (as estimated with Watterson's θ) per bp for each fragment. B: Pairwise nucleotide diversity (π). C: Tajima's D statistic for each fragment. Z: standardized Fay and Wu's statistic.
Intensity of purifying selection (1-f) and levels of adaptive evolution (α)
| Model name and description | α | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| M0: Strict selective neutrality | 1 | 0 | 321 | ~ 0 |
| M1: Homogeneous purifying selection + | 0.13 | 0 | 2.16 | 0.06 |
| M2: Purifying selection with variable intensity + | 0 | 1.16 | 0.16 | |
| M3 Homogeneous purifying selection + homogeneous levels of adaptive evolution | 0.11 | 0.36 | 0.79 | 0.24 |
| M5: Purifying selection with variable intensity + varying levels of adaptive evolution | α1 = 0.4 | 3.48 | 0.02 | |
1-f quantifies the intensity of purifying selection through the fraction of new amino acid changing mutation under strong purifying selection. α is the fraction of divergence attributable to adaptive evolution (driven by positive selection on amino acid changing mutations).
The best model (M4) is highlighted in bold and all differences in AIC among models ΔAIC) are computed relative to M4. WAIC are the statistical weights of each model in the model averaging procedure we used.
Subscripts in f1, f2, f3, α1, α2, α3 refer to the gene fragment categories. 1: control fragments, 2: flowering gene fragments, 3: symbiotic gene fragments. N/A: not applicable.
Figure 3Tests of selective neutrality of polymorphism within each group. The joint distributions of (D, Z) tests statistics expected under neutrality in the Eastern group (group 1, panel 3a) and the Western group (group 2, panel 3b) are plotted using a blue shading for the probability density. Symbiotic genes are plotted as green dots and flowering genes as orange dots using each candidate gene abbreviation. Control loci are represented as black dots. The joint distribution for (D, Z) within each group was obtained through 105 coalescent simulations from models parametrized to fit patterns of polymorphisms in the set of controlled fragments (See Methods for further details). Note that in order to generate a unique graphical representation of the neutral joint distribution, simulations for each of the 53 loci were pooled and the resulting (D, Z) distribution was binned using 104 categories (rigorous p-values computed using null distributions tailored for each locus length and polymorphism are available in Additional file 7, Table S5).
Figure 4Sliding window analysis of the gene . Polymorphism was analysed in 500 nucleotide-long windows with 50 nucleotide steps along the alignments. Displayed statistics are: S, the number of polymorphic sites per window, non-synonymous polymorphism given by Watterson's θ per non-synonymous site, FST given by Weir and Cockerham's estimator [59] and Tajima's D computed in both groups. The grey frames denote the positions of exons and the arrowheads mark the position of the sites found with high posterior probability (> 0.95) to be targets of positive selection in the Medicago genus.