Literature DB >> 11514464

Interpretation of variation across marker loci as evidence of selection.

R Vitalis1, K Dawson, P Boursot.   

Abstract

Population structure and history have similar effects on the genetic diversity at all neutral loci. However, some marker loci may also have been strongly influenced by natural selection. Selection shapes genetic diversity in a locus-specific manner. If we could identify those loci that have responded to selection during the divergence of populations, then we may obtain better estimates of the parameters of population history by excluding these loci. Previous attempts were made to identify outlier loci from the distribution of sample statistics under neutral models of population structure and history. Unfortunately these methods depend on assumptions about population structure and history that usually cannot be verified. In this article, we define new population-specific parameters of population divergence and construct sample statistics that are estimators of these parameters. We then use the joint distribution of these estimators to identify outlier loci that may be subject to selection. We found that outlier loci are easier to recognize when this joint distribution is conditioned on the total number of allelic states represented in the pooled sample at each locus. This is so because the conditional distribution is less sensitive to the values of nuisance parameters.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11514464      PMCID: PMC1461744     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  27 in total

1.  Letters to the editors: Lewontin-Krakauer test for neutral genes.

Authors:  M Nei; T Maruyama
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Letters to the editors: Remarks on the Lewontin-Krakauer test.

Authors:  A Robertson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Average number of nucleotide differences in a sample from a single subpopulation: a test for population subdivision.

Authors:  C Strobeck
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Heterozygosity and relationship in regularly subdivided populations.

Authors:  G Malécot
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 1.570

5.  Drift, admixture, and selection in human evolution: a study with DNA polymorphisms.

Authors:  A M Bowcock; J R Kidd; J L Mountain; J M Hebert; L Carotenuto; K K Kidd; L L Cavalli-Sforza
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-02-01       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene.

Authors:  J M Smith; J Haigh
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1974-02       Impact factor: 1.588

7.  Distribution of gene frequency as a test of the theory of the selective neutrality of polymorphisms.

Authors:  R C Lewontin; J Krakauer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Testing the heterogeneity of F values: a suggestion and a correction.

Authors:  S Tsakas; C B Krimbas
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1976-10       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Expected linkage disequilibrium for a neutral locus linked to a chromosomal arrangement.

Authors:  C Strobeck
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  The coalescent process in models with selection and recombination.

Authors:  R R Hudson; N L Kaplan
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  66 in total

1.  A microsatellite-based multilocus screen for the identification of local selective sweeps.

Authors:  Christian Schlötterer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Interrogating a high-density SNP map for signatures of natural selection.

Authors:  Joshua M Akey; Ge Zhang; Kun Zhang; Li Jin; Mark D Shriver
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  On the distribution of temporal variations in allele frequency: consequences for the estimation of effective population size and the detection of loci undergoing selection.

Authors:  Isabelle Goldringer; Thomas Bataillon
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Detecting selection in population trees: the Lewontin and Krakauer test extended.

Authors:  Maxime Bonhomme; Claude Chevalet; Bertrand Servin; Simon Boitard; Jihad Abdallah; Sarah Blott; Magali Sancristobal
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Effectiveness of in situ and ex situ conservation of crop diversity. What a Phaseolus vulgaris L. landrace case study can tell us.

Authors:  Valeria Negri; Barbara Tiranti
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2010-09-11       Impact factor: 1.082

6.  Splendor and misery of indirect measures of migration and gene flow.

Authors:  G Guillot
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 3.821

7.  Likelihood-free inference of population structure and local adaptation in a Bayesian hierarchical model.

Authors:  Eric Bazin; Kevin J Dawson; Mark A Beaumont
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Genome-Wide Scan for Adaptive Divergence and Association with Population-Specific Covariates.

Authors:  Mathieu Gautier
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Genetic consequences of selection during the evolution of cultivated sunflower.

Authors:  John M Burke; Steven J Knapp; Loren H Rieseberg
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-06-18       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Adaptation strategies and referencing trial of Scots and black pine populations subjected to heavy metal pollution.

Authors:  Ewa Chudzińska; Jean B Diatta; Aleksandra Wojnicka-Półtorak
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 4.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.