Literature DB >> 21806358

Endoscopically assisted versus open repair of sagittal craniosynostosis: the St. Louis Children's Hospital experience.

Manish N Shah1, Alex A Kane, J Dayne Petersen, Albert S Woo, Sybill D Naidoo, Matthew D Smyth.   

Abstract

OBJECT: This study investigated the differences in effectiveness and morbidity between endoscopically assisted wide-vertex strip craniectomy with barrel-stave osteotomies and postoperative helmet therapy versus open calvarial vault reconstruction without helmet therapy for sagittal craniosynostosis.
METHODS: Between 2003 and 2010, the authors prospectively observed 89 children less than 12 months old who were surgically treated for a diagnosis of isolated sagittal synostosis. The endoscopic procedure was offered starting in 2006. The data associated with length of stay, blood loss, transfusion rates, operating times, and cephalic indices were reviewed.
RESULTS: There were 47 endoscopically treated patients with a mean age at surgery of 3.6 months and 42 patients with open-vault reconstruction whose mean age at surgery was 6.8 months. The mean follow-up time was 13 months for endoscopic versus 25 months for open procedures. The mean operating time for the endoscopic procedure was 88 minutes, versus 179 minutes for the open surgery. The mean blood loss was 29 ml for endoscopic versus 218 ml for open procedures. Three endoscopically treated cases (6.4%) underwent transfusion, whereas all patients with open procedures underwent transfusion, with a mean of 1.6 transfusions per patient. The mean length of stay was 1.2 days for endoscopic and 3.9 days for open procedures. Of endoscopically treated patients completing helmet therapy, the mean duration for helmet therapy was 8.7 months. The mean pre- and postoperative cephalic indices for endoscopic procedures were 68% and 76% at 13 months postoperatively, versus 68% and 77% at 25 months postoperatively for open surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopically assisted strip craniectomy offers a safe and effective treatment for sagittal craniosynostosis that is comparable in outcome to calvarial vault reconstruction, with no increase in morbidity and a shorter length of stay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21806358     DOI: 10.3171/2011.5.PEDS1128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Pediatr        ISSN: 1933-0707            Impact factor:   2.375


  18 in total

1.  Effects of open and endoscopic surgery on skull growth and calvarial vault volumes in sagittal synostosis.

Authors:  Rahel G Ghenbot; Kamlesh B Patel; Gary B Skolnick; Sybill D Naidoo; Matthew D Smyth; Albert S Woo
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.046

2.  The Temporal Region in Unilateral Coronal Craniosynostosis: Fronto-orbital Advancement Versus Endoscopy-Assisted Strip Craniectomy.

Authors:  Benjamin Masserano; Albert S Woo; Gary B Skolnick; Sybill D Naidoo; Mark R Proctor; Matthew D Smyth; Kamlesh B Patel
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2017-12-14

3.  Novel use of an ultrasonic bone-cutting device for endoscopic-assisted craniosynostosis surgery.

Authors:  Kaisorn L Chaichana; George I Jallo; Amir H Dorafshar; Edward S Ahn
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 1.475

4.  Cephalic index correlates poorly with intracranial volume in non-syndromic scaphocephalic patients.

Authors:  Junnu Leikola; Virve Koljonen; Arja Heliövaara; Jyri Hukki; Mika Koivikko
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 1.475

5.  Endoscope-assisted management of sagittal synostosis: wide vertex suturectomy and barrel stave osteotomies versus narrow vertex suturectomy.

Authors:  Brian J Dlouhy; Dennis C Nguyen; Kamlesh B Patel; Gwendolyn M Hoben; Gary B Skolnick; Sybill D Naidoo; Albert S Woo; Matthew D Smyth
Journal:  J Neurosurg Pediatr       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  Point of maximum width: a new measure for anthropometric outcomes in patients with sagittal synostosis.

Authors:  Noopur Gangopadhyay; Manjool Shah; Gary B Skolnick; Kamlesh B Patel; Sybill D Naidoo; Albert S Woo
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.046

7.  Validation of cephalic index measurements in scaphocephaly.

Authors:  Erik J van Lindert; Francoise J Siepel; Hans Delye; Anke M Ettema; Stefaan J Bergé; Thomas J J Maal; Wilfred A Borstlap
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 8.  Endoscopic craniosynostosis repair.

Authors:  Mark R Proctor
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2014-07

Review 9.  Endoscopic versus open approach in craniosynostosis repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes.

Authors:  Anshit Goyal; Victor M Lu; Yagiz U Yolcu; Mohamed Elminawy; David J Daniels
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2018-06-30       Impact factor: 1.475

10.  Characterization of complications associated with open and endoscopic craniosynostosis surgery at a single institution.

Authors:  Rowland H Han; Dennis C Nguyen; Brent S Bruck; Gary B Skolnick; Chester K Yarbrough; Sybill D Naidoo; Kamlesh B Patel; Alex A Kane; Albert S Woo; Matthew D Smyth
Journal:  J Neurosurg Pediatr       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 2.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.