Literature DB >> 27611899

Endoscope-assisted management of sagittal synostosis: wide vertex suturectomy and barrel stave osteotomies versus narrow vertex suturectomy.

Brian J Dlouhy1, Dennis C Nguyen2, Kamlesh B Patel2, Gwendolyn M Hoben2, Gary B Skolnick2, Sybill D Naidoo2, Albert S Woo2, Matthew D Smyth1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Endoscope-assisted methods for treatment of craniosynostosis have reported benefits over open calvarial vault reconstruction. In this paper, the authors evaluated 2 methods for endoscope-assisted correction of sagittal synostosis: wide vertex suturectomy and barrel stave osteotomies (WVS+BSO) and narrow vertex suturectomy (NVS). METHODS The authors evaluated patients with nonsyndromic sagittal synostosis treated with either wide vertex suturectomy (4-6 cm) and barrel stave osteotomies (WVS+BSO) or narrow vertex suturectomy (NVS) (approximately 2 cm) between October 2006 and July 2013. Prospectively collected data included patient age, sex, operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), postoperative hemoglobin level, number of transfusions, complications, and cephalic index. Fourteen patients in the NVS group were age matched to 14 patients in the WVS+BSO group. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and Student t-tests were used to compare prospectively obtained data from the WVS+BSO group with the NVS group in a series of univariate analyses. RESULTS The mean age at surgery was 3.9 months for WVS+BSO and 3.8 months for NVS. The mean operative time for patients undergoing NVS was 59.0 minutes, significantly less than the 83.4-minute operative time for patients undergoing WVS+BSO (p < 0.05). The differences in mean EBL (NVS: 25.4 ml; WVS+BSO: 27.5 ml), mean postoperative hemoglobin level (NVS: 8.6 g/dl; WVS+BSO: 8.0 g/dl), mean preoperative cephalic index (NVS: 69.9; WVS+BSO: 68.2), and mean cephalic index at 1 year of age (NVS: 78.1; WVS+BSO: 77.2) were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS The NVS and WVS+BSO produced nearly identical clinical results, as cephalic index at 1 year of age was similar between the 2 approaches. However, the NVS required fewer procedural steps and significantly less operative time than the WVS+BSO. The NVS group obtained the final cephalic index in a similar amount of time postoperatively as the WVS+BSO group. Complications, transfusion rates, and EBL were not different between the 2 techniques.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EAC = endoscope-assisted craniectomy; EBL = estimated blood loss; NVS = narrow vertex suturectomy; WVS+BSO = wide vertex suturectomy and barrel stave osteotomies; craniofacial; craniosynostosis; endoscopic; minimally invasive; sagittal synostosis; suturectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27611899      PMCID: PMC5333556          DOI: 10.3171/2016.6.PEDS1623

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Pediatr        ISSN: 1933-0707            Impact factor:   2.375


  12 in total

1.  The management of sagittal synostosis using endoscopic suturectomy and postoperative helmet therapy.

Authors:  Emily B Ridgway; John Berry-Candelario; Ronald T Grondin; Gary F Rogers; Mark R Proctor
Journal:  J Neurosurg Pediatr       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.375

2.  The evolving role of springs in craniofacial surgery: the first 100 clinical cases.

Authors:  Claes G K Lauritzen; Charles Davis; Anna Ivarsson; Claire Sanger; Timothy D Hewitt
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 3.  Endoscopic technique for sagittal synostosis.

Authors:  David F Jimenez; Constance M Barone
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 4.  Sagittal synostosis.

Authors:  J A Jane; K Y Lin; J A Jane
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2000-09-15       Impact factor: 4.047

5.  Endoscopy-assisted wide-vertex craniectomy, "barrel-stave" osteotomies, and postoperative helmet molding therapy in the early management of sagittal suture craniosynostosis.

Authors:  D F Jimenez; C M Barone
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2000-09-15       Impact factor: 4.047

6.  Endoscopically assisted versus open repair of sagittal craniosynostosis: the St. Louis Children's Hospital experience.

Authors:  Manish N Shah; Alex A Kane; J Dayne Petersen; Albert S Woo; Sybill D Naidoo; Matthew D Smyth
Journal:  J Neurosurg Pediatr       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.375

7.  Endoscopic craniectomy for early surgical correction of sagittal craniosynostosis.

Authors:  D F Jimenez; C M Barone
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 5.115

8.  Early management of craniosynostosis using endoscopic-assisted strip craniectomies and cranial orthotic molding therapy.

Authors:  David F Jimenez; Constance M Barone; Cathy C Cartwright; Lynette Baker
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  Endoscopy-assisted wide-vertex craniectomy, barrel stave osteotomies, and postoperative helmet molding therapy in the management of sagittal suture craniosynostosis.

Authors:  David F Jimenez; Constance M Barone; Maria E McGee; Cathy C Cartwright; C Lynette Baker
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.115

10.  Evolution of surgery for sagittal synostosis: the role of new technologies.

Authors:  Katarzyna A Mackenzie; Charles Davis; Arthur Yang; Martin R MacFarlane
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.046

View more
  1 in total

1.  Modified endoscopic strip craniectomy technique for sagittal craniosynostosis: provides comparable results and avoids bony defects.

Authors:  Mustafa Sakar; Serdar Çevik; Semra Işık; Hassan Haidar; Yener Şahin; Bülent Saçak; Yaşar Bayri; Adnan Dağçınar
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 1.532

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.