Kaisorn L Chaichana1,2, George I Jallo3, Amir H Dorafshar4, Edward S Ahn3. 1. Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. Kaisorn@jhmi.edu. 2. Department of Neurosurgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Meyer 8-184, 600 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21202, USA. Kaisorn@jhmi.edu. 3. Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. 4. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Endoscopic-assisted craniosynostosis surgery is associated with less blood loss and shorter operative times as compared to open surgery. However, in infants who have low circulating blood volumes, the endoscopic approach is still associated with significant blood loss. A major source of blood loss is the bone that is cut during surgery. We discuss the novel use of an ultrasonic bone-cutting device for craniosynostosis surgery, which decreases bone bleeding. This device, which has primarily only been used for spine and skull base surgery, may help reduce blood loss in these infants. METHODS: All patients with single suture craniosynostosis who were operated on with the use of an ultrasonic bone-cutting device were identified. The information retrospectively recorded from patient charts included patient age, suture involved, blood loss, operative times, complications, preoperative hemoglobin, postoperative hemoglobin, length of hospital stay, and follow-up times. RESULTS: Thirteen patients (12 males, 1 female) underwent surgery with an ultrasonic bone-cutting device during the reviewed period. The average age (±standard deviation) of the patients was 11.8 (±1.6) weeks. Four patients had metopic synostosis and nine patients had sagittal synostosis. The average surgery time was 84 (±13) min. The median (interquartile range) blood loss was 20 (10-70) cc. No patients required blood transfusions. Three patients had dural tears. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate the novel use of an ultrasonic bone-cutting device for endoscopic-assisted craniosynostosis surgery. This device limited blood loss while maintaining short operative times for infants with low circulating blood volumes.
PURPOSE: Endoscopic-assisted craniosynostosis surgery is associated with less blood loss and shorter operative times as compared to open surgery. However, in infants who have low circulating blood volumes, the endoscopic approach is still associated with significant blood loss. A major source of blood loss is the bone that is cut during surgery. We discuss the novel use of an ultrasonic bone-cutting device for craniosynostosis surgery, which decreases bone bleeding. This device, which has primarily only been used for spine and skull base surgery, may help reduce blood loss in these infants. METHODS: All patients with single suture craniosynostosis who were operated on with the use of an ultrasonic bone-cutting device were identified. The information retrospectively recorded from patient charts included patient age, suture involved, blood loss, operative times, complications, preoperative hemoglobin, postoperative hemoglobin, length of hospital stay, and follow-up times. RESULTS: Thirteen patients (12 males, 1 female) underwent surgery with an ultrasonic bone-cutting device during the reviewed period. The average age (±standard deviation) of the patients was 11.8 (±1.6) weeks. Four patients had metopic synostosis and nine patients had sagittal synostosis. The average surgery time was 84 (±13) min. The median (interquartile range) blood loss was 20 (10-70) cc. No patients required blood transfusions. Three patients had dural tears. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate the novel use of an ultrasonic bone-cutting device for endoscopic-assisted craniosynostosis surgery. This device limited blood loss while maintaining short operative times for infants with low circulating blood volumes.
Entities:
Keywords:
Blood loss; Bone scalpel; Craniosynostosis; Endoscopic; Metopic; Piezoelectric; Piezosurgery; Sagittal; Ultrasonic bone cutting
Authors: Petra M Meier; Susan M Goobie; James A DiNardo; Mark R Proctor; David Zurakowski; Sulpicio G Soriano Journal: Anesth Analg Date: 2010-12-14 Impact factor: 5.108
Authors: Sarah MacKinnon; Gary F Rogers; Matt Gregas; Mark R Proctor; John B Mulliken; Linda R Dagi Journal: J AAPOS Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 1.220