Literature DB >> 25006901

Point of maximum width: a new measure for anthropometric outcomes in patients with sagittal synostosis.

Noopur Gangopadhyay1, Manjool Shah, Gary B Skolnick, Kamlesh B Patel, Sybill D Naidoo, Albert S Woo.   

Abstract

The esthetic success of sagittal synostosis reconstruction is measured by cephalic index (CI). This limited measure does not fully account for the abnormal head shape in sagittal synostosis. In this retrospective study, we investigate a new objective measure, point of maximum width (PMW) of the skull from a vertex view, to determine where the head is widest for children with sagittal synostosis as compared with normal controls. Preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans of 27 children with sagittal synostosis and 14 postoperative CT scans at least 8 months after surgery were obtained. Normal CT scans were matched for age, sex, and race. Three-dimensional renderings were standardized for orientation. Mean (SE) PMW in patients with sagittal synostosis was 53% (1%) compared with 57% (1%) in controls (P < 0.001). Mean (SE) CI in patients with sagittal synostosis was 66.8% (0.8%) compared with 83.3% (1.0%) in controls (P < 0.001). The correlation between PMW and CI was weak in both controls (r2 = 0.002, P = 0.824) and uncorrected cases (r2 = 0.083, P = 0.145). After surgical correction, both CI and PMW significantly improved. Mean (SE) PMW in patients after surgical release of sagittal synostosis was 58% (1%) compared with 58% (1%) in controls (P = 0.986). The PMW is not a surrogate for CI but is a novel, valid measure of skull shape, which aids in quantifying the widest region of the skull. It is significantly more anterior in children with sagittal synostosis and exhibits a consistent posterior shift along the cranium after surgery, showing no difference compared with healthy children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25006901      PMCID: PMC4090594          DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000000875

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  14 in total

1.  Measuring cranial vault volume with three-dimensional photography: a method of measurement comparable to the gold standard.

Authors:  Douglas R McKay; Kristen M Davidge; Susanne K Williams; Lloyd A Ellis; David K Chong; Rodrigo P Teixeira; Andrew L Greensmith; Anthony D Holmes
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.046

2.  Endoscopically assisted versus open repair of sagittal craniosynostosis: the St. Louis Children's Hospital experience.

Authors:  Manish N Shah; Alex A Kane; J Dayne Petersen; Albert S Woo; Sybill D Naidoo; Matthew D Smyth
Journal:  J Neurosurg Pediatr       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.375

3.  Long-term anthropometric outcomes following surgery for isolated sagittal craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Deepak Agrawal; Paul Steinbok; D Douglas Cochrane
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.115

4.  Single sutural craniosynostoses: surgical outcomes and long-term growth.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Fearon; Rachel A Ruotolo; John C Kolar
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  Intracranial volume and cephalic index outcomes for total calvarial reconstruction among nonsyndromic sagittal synostosis patients.

Authors:  Justin B Heller; Misha M Heller; Bianca Knoll; Joubin S Gabbay; Charles Duncan; John A Persing
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  Sagittal craniosynostosis: surgical outcomes and long-term growth.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Fearon; Emily B McLaughlin; John C Kolar
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 7.  MOC-PS(SM) CME article: management considerations in the treatment of craniosynostosis.

Authors:  John A Persing
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  New scaphocephaly severity indices of sagittal craniosynostosis: a comparative study with cranial index quantifications.

Authors:  Salvador Ruiz-Correa; Raymond W Sze; Jacqueline R Starr; Hen-Tzu J Lin; Matthew L Speltz; Michael L Cunningham; Anne V Hing
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2006-03

9.  Identifying reproducible patterns of calvarial dysmorphology in nonsyndromic sagittal craniosynostosis may affect operative intervention and outcomes assessment.

Authors:  Rodney E Schmelzer; Chad A Perlyn; Alex A Kane; Thomas K Pilgram; Daniel Govier; Jeffrey L Marsh
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2007-04-15       Impact factor: 4.730

10.  Evolution of surgery for sagittal synostosis: the role of new technologies.

Authors:  Katarzyna A Mackenzie; Charles Davis; Arthur Yang; Martin R MacFarlane
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.046

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.