Literature DB >> 21805213

Data sharing and dual-use issues.

Louise Bezuidenhout1.   

Abstract

The concept of dual-use encapsulates the potential for well-intentioned, beneficial scientific research to also be misused by a third party for malicious ends. The concept of dual-use challenges scientists to look beyond the immediate outcomes of their research and to develop an awareness of possible future (mis)uses of scientific research. Since 2001 much attention has been paid to the possible need to regulate the dual-use potential of the life sciences. Regulation initiatives fall under two broad categories-those that develop the ethical education of scientists and foster an awareness and responsibility of dual-use issues, and those which assess the regulation of information being generated by current research. Both types of initiatives are premised on a cautious, risk-adverse philosophy which advocates careful examination of all future endpoints of research endeavors. This caution advocated within initiatives such as pre-publication review of journal articles contrasts to the obligation to share underpinning data sharing discussions. As the dual-use debate has yet to make a significant impact on data sharing discussions (and vice versa) it is possible that these two areas of knowledge control may present areas of ethical conflict for scientists, and thus need to be more closely examined. This paper examines the tension between the obligation to share exemplified by data sharing principles and the concerns raised by the risk-cautious culture of the dual-use debates. The paper concludes by reflecting on the issues of responsibility as raised by dual-use as relating to data sharing, such as the chain of custody for shared data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21805213      PMCID: PMC4727252          DOI: 10.1007/s11948-011-9298-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  14 in total

1.  A Hippocratic Oath for scientists.

Authors:  J Rotblat
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-11-19       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Disaster in the making.

Authors:  R Nowak
Journal:  New Sci       Date:  2001-01-13       Impact factor: 0.319

3.  When risk outweighs benefit. Dual-use research needs a scientifically sound risk-benefit analysis and legally binding biosecurity measures.

Authors:  Jan van Aken
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 8.807

4.  Ethics of reconstructing Spanish flu: is it wise to resurrect a deadly virus?

Authors:  J van Aken
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 3.821

5.  The mousepox experience. An interview with Ronald Jackson and Ian Ramshaw on dual-use research. Interview by Michael J. Selgelid and Lorna Weir.

Authors:  Ronald Jackson; Ian Ramshaw
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 8.807

6.  Expression of mouse interleukin-4 by a recombinant ectromelia virus suppresses cytolytic lymphocyte responses and overcomes genetic resistance to mousepox.

Authors:  R J Jackson; A J Ramsay; C D Christensen; S Beaton; D F Hall; I A Ramshaw
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.103

7.  Initial genetic characterization of the 1918 "Spanish" influenza virus.

Authors:  J K Taubenberger; A H Reid; A E Krafft; K E Bijwaard; T G Fanning
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-03-21       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Ethical and philosophical consideration of the dual-use dilemma in the biological sciences.

Authors:  Seumas Miller; Michael J Selgelid
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2007-12-01       Impact factor: 3.525

9.  Prepublication data sharing.

Authors:  Ewan Birney; Thomas J Hudson; Eric D Green; Chris Gunter; Sean Eddy; Jane Rogers; Jennifer R Harris; S Dusko Ehrlich; Rolf Apweiler; Christopher P Austin; Lisa Berglund; Martin Bobrow; Chas Bountra; Anthony J Brookes; Anne Cambon-Thomsen; Nigel P Carter; Rex L Chisholm; Jorge L Contreras; Robert M Cooke; William L Crosby; Ken Dewar; Richard Durbin; Stephanie O M Dyke; Joseph R Ecker; Khaled El Emam; Lars Feuk; Stacey B Gabriel; John Gallacher; William M Gelbart; Antoni Granell; Francisco Guarner; Tim Hubbard; Scott A Jackson; Jennifer L Jennings; Yann Joly; Steven M Jones; Jane Kaye; Karen L Kennedy; Bartha Maria Knoppers; Nikos C Kyrpides; William W Lowrance; Jingchu Luo; John J MacKay; Luis Martín-Rivera; W Richard McCombie; John D McPherson; Linda Miller; Webb Miller; Don Moerman; Vincent Mooser; Cynthia C Morton; James M Ostell; B F Francis Ouellette; Julian Parkhill; Parminder S Raina; Christopher Rawlings; Steven E Scherer; Stephen W Scherer; Paul N Schofield; Christoph W Sensen; Victoria C Stodden; Michael R Sussman; Toshihiro Tanaka; Janet Thornton; Tatsuhiko Tsunoda; David Valle; Eero I Vuorio; Neil M Walker; Susan Wallace; George Weinstock; William B Whitman; Kim C Worley; Cathy Wu; Jiayan Wu; Jun Yu
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-09-10       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Post-publication sharing of data and tools.

Authors:  Paul N Schofield; Tania Bubela; Thomas Weaver; Lili Portilla; Stephen D Brown; John M Hancock; David Einhorn; Glauco Tocchini-Valentini; Martin Hrabe de Angelis; Nadia Rosenthal
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-09-10       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  6 in total

1.  A game theoretic analysis of research data sharing.

Authors:  Tessa E Pronk; Paulien H Wiersma; Anne van Weerden; Feike Schieving
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 2.984

2.  What drives academic data sharing?

Authors:  Benedikt Fecher; Sascha Friesike; Marcel Hebing
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Biomedical Data Sharing Among Researchers: A Study from Jordan.

Authors:  Lina Al-Ebbini; Omar F Khabour; Karem H Alzoubi; Almuthanna K Alkaraki
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2020-11-23

4.  Between Scylla and Charybdis: reconciling competing data management demands in the life sciences.

Authors:  Louise M Bezuidenhout; Michael Morrison
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 2.652

5.  Self-tracking the microbiome: where do we go from here?

Authors:  Carine Gimbert; François-Joseph Lapointe
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 14.650

Review 6.  The role of ethics in data governance of large neuro-ICT projects.

Authors:  Bernd Carsten Stahl; Stephen Rainey; Emma Harris; B Tyr Fothergill
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 4.497

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.