Literature DB >> 18060518

Ethical and philosophical consideration of the dual-use dilemma in the biological sciences.

Seumas Miller1, Michael J Selgelid.   

Abstract

The dual-use dilemma arises in the context of research in the biological and other sciences as a consequence of the fact that one and the same piece of scientific research sometimes has the potential to be used for bad as well as good purposes. It is an ethical dilemma since it is about promoting good in the context of the potential for also causing harm, e.g., the promotion of health in the context of providing the wherewithal for the killing of innocents. It is an ethical dilemma for the researcher because of the potential actions of others, e.g., malevolent non-researchers who might steal dangerous biological agents, or make use of the original researcher's work. And it is a dilemma for governments concerned with the security of their citizens, as well as their health. In this article we construct a taxonomy of types of "experiments of concern" in the biological sciences, and thereby map the terrain of ethical risk. We then provide a series of analyses of the ethical problems and considerations at issue in the dual-use dilemma, including the impermissibility of certain kinds of research and possible restrictions on dissemination of research results given the risks to health and security. Finally, we explore the main available institutional responses to some of the specific ethical problems posed by the dual-use dilemma in the biological sciences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18060518      PMCID: PMC7089176          DOI: 10.1007/s11948-007-9043-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  52 in total

Review 1.  Controlling biological warfare threats: resolving potential tensions among the research community, industry, and the national security community.

Authors:  G L Epstein
Journal:  Crit Rev Microbiol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 7.624

2.  Virology. Active poliovirus baked from scratch.

Authors:  Jennifer Couzin
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-07-12       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Killing 'without the distressing preliminaries': Scientists' defence of the British biological warfare programme.

Authors:  Brian Balmer
Journal:  Minerva       Date:  2002

4.  Ethics of university research, biotechnology and potential military spin-off.

Authors:  Kathryn Nixdorff; Wolfgang Bender
Journal:  Minerva       Date:  2002

5.  An educational imperative: The role of ethical codes and normative prohibitions in CBW-Applicable research.

Authors:  Jacqueline Simon; Melissa Hersh
Journal:  Minerva       Date:  2002

6.  Biodefense. Has biodefense gone overboard?

Authors:  Martin Enserink; Jocelyn Kaiser
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-03-04       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Characterization of the 1918 influenza virus polymerase genes.

Authors:  Jeffery K Taubenberger; Ann H Reid; Raina M Lourens; Ruixue Wang; Guozhong Jin; Thomas G Fanning
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-10-06       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Infectious disease research and dual-use risk.

Authors:  Maureen Kelley
Journal:  Virtual Mentor       Date:  2006-04-01

9.  Biosecurity implications of the synthesis of pathogenic viruses.

Authors:  Aleksandr Rabodzey
Journal:  Politics Life Sci       Date:  2003-09

10.  Smallpox revisited?

Authors:  Michael J Selgelid
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 11.229

View more
  35 in total

1.  Implementing biosecurity education: approaches, resources and programmes.

Authors:  Masamichi Minehata; Judi Sture; Nariyoshi Shinomiya; Simon Whitby
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2011-10-30       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Managing the unimaginable. Regulatory responses to the challenges posed by synthetic biology and synthetic genomics.

Authors:  Gabrielle N Samuel; Michael J Selgelid; Ian Kerridge
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 8.807

3.  Governance of dual-use research: an ethical dilemma.

Authors:  Michael J Selgelid
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 9.408

Review 4.  Evolution of different dual-use concepts in international and national law and its implications on research ethics and governance.

Authors:  Johannes Rath; Monique Ischi; Dana Perkins
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  The concept of governance in dual-use research.

Authors:  Alex Dubov
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2014-08

6.  Ethics in the minutiae: examining the role of the physical laboratory environment in ethical discourse.

Authors:  Louise Bezuidenhout
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2014-02-09       Impact factor: 3.525

7.  On the need for a national board to assess dual use research of concern.

Authors:  Arturo Casadevall; Terence S Dermody; Michael J Imperiale; Rozanne M Sandri-Goldin; Thomas Shenk
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 5.103

8.  Biosecurity and Open-Source Biology: The Promise and Peril of Distributed Synthetic Biological Technologies.

Authors:  Nicholas G Evans; Michael J Selgelid
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 3.525

9.  Moving life science ethics debates beyond national borders: some empirical observations.

Authors:  Louise Bezuidenhout
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 3.525

10.  Professionalization as a governance strategy for synthetic biology.

Authors:  Lorna Weir; Michael J Selgelid
Journal:  Syst Synth Biol       Date:  2009-10-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.