Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 When risk outweighs benefit. Dual-use research needs a scientifically sound risk-benefit analysis and legally binding biosecurity measures.

Literature DB >> 16819441

When risk outweighs benefit. Dual-use research needs a scientifically sound risk-benefit analysis and legally binding biosecurity measures.

Jan van Aken¹.
1. van.aken@t-online.de

Abstract

Mesh：

Year: 2006 PMID： 16819441 PMCID： PMC1490308 DOI： 10.1038/sj.embor.7400726

Source DB: PubMed Journal: EMBO Rep ISSN： 1469-221X Impact factor: 8.807

× No keyword cloud information.

12 in total

1. Biosecurity must be internationally supervised.

Authors: Jan van Aken; Stefan Johannsen; Regine Kollek
Journal: Nature Date: 2004-09-02 Impact factor: 49.962

2. Biodefense. U.S. agencies unveil plan for biosecurity peer review.

Authors: Jennifer Couzin
Journal: Science Date: 2004-03-12 Impact factor: 47.728

3. Better never than late.

Authors: Donald Kennedy
Journal: Science Date: 2005-10-14 Impact factor: 47.728

4. Modeling attacks on the food supply.

Authors: Bruce Alberts
Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-06-28 Impact factor: 11.205

5. Atlantic storm.

Authors: Daniel S Hamilton; Bradley T Smith
Journal: EMBO Rep Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 8.807

6. Characterization of the 1918 influenza virus polymerase genes.

Authors: Jeffery K Taubenberger; Ann H Reid; Raina M Lourens; Ruixue Wang; Guozhong Jin; Thomas G Fanning
Journal: Nature Date: 2005-10-06 Impact factor: 49.962

7. Expression of mouse interleukin-4 by a recombinant ectromelia virus suppresses cytolytic lymphocyte responses and overcomes genetic resistance to mousepox.

Authors: R J Jackson; A J Ramsay; C D Christensen; S Beaton; D F Hall; I A Ramshaw
Journal: J Virol Date: 2001-02 Impact factor: 5.103

8. Characterization of the reconstructed 1918 Spanish influenza pandemic virus.

Authors: Terrence M Tumpey; Christopher F Basler; Patricia V Aguilar; Hui Zeng; Alicia Solórzano; David E Swayne; Nancy J Cox; Jacqueline M Katz; Jeffery K Taubenberger; Peter Palese; Adolfo García-Sastre
Journal: Science Date: 2005-10-07 Impact factor: 47.728

9. Statement on scientific publication and security.

Authors: Ronald Atlas; Philip Campbell; Nicholas R Cozzarelli; Greg Curfman; Lynn Enquist; Gerald Fink; Annette Flanagin; Jacqueline Fletcher; Elizabeth George; Gordon Hammes; David Heyman; Thomas Inglesby; Samuel Kaplan; Donald Kennedy; Judith Krug; Rachel Levinson; Emilie Marcus; Henry Metzger; Stephen S Morse; Alison O'Brien; Andrew Onderdonk; George Poste; Beatrice Renault; Robert Rich; Ariella Rosengard; Steven Salzberg; Mary Scanlan; Thomas Shenk; Herbert Tabor; Harold Varmus; Eckard Wimmer; Keith Yamamoto
Journal: Science Date: 2003-02-21 Impact factor: 63.714

4. Research infrastructures, policies and the 'web of prevention': the ethical implications of inadequate research environments.

Authors: Louise Bezuidenhout
Journal: Med Confl Surviv Date: 2012 Jan-Mar

When risk outweighs benefit. Dual-use research needs a scientifically sound risk-benefit analysis and legally binding biosecurity measures.

1. Biosecurity must be internationally supervised.

2. Biodefense. U.S. agencies unveil plan for biosecurity peer review.

3. Better never than late.

4. Modeling attacks on the food supply.

5. Atlantic storm.

6. Characterization of the 1918 influenza virus polymerase genes.

7. Expression of mouse interleukin-4 by a recombinant ectromelia virus suppresses cytolytic lymphocyte responses and overcomes genetic resistance to mousepox.

8. Characterization of the reconstructed 1918 Spanish influenza pandemic virus.

9. Statement on scientific publication and security.

10. The 1918 flu virus is resurrected.

1. Video in science. Protocol videos: the implications for research and society.

2. Citizen biologists. The Lausanne experience.

Review 3. Biosecurity and the review and publication of dual-use research of concern.

4. Research infrastructures, policies and the 'web of prevention': the ethical implications of inadequate research environments.

5. Can Scientists Regulate the Publication of Dual Use Research?

6. Data sharing and dual-use issues.

7. Dual dual-use research of concern: publish and perish?

8. Responsibilities or requirements: framing dual use issues for scientific engagement.

9. Biosecurity in emerging life sciences technologies, a canadian public health perspective.

10. Why has Not There been More Research of Concern?