Sunirmal Paul1, Sally A Amundson. 1. Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The issue of potential confounding factors is critical to the development of any approach to radiation biodosimetry, and has not been fully addressed for gene expression-based approaches. MATERIALS AND METHODS: As a step in this direction, we have investigated the effect of smoking on the global radiation gene expression response in ex vivo-irradiated peripheral blood cells using microarray analysis. We also evaluated the ability of gene expression signatures to predict the radiation exposure level of ex vivo-exposed samples from smokers and non-smokers of both genders. RESULTS: We identified eight genes with a radiation response that was significantly affected by smoking status, and confirmed an effect of smoking on the radiation response of the four and a half LIM domains 2 (FHL2) gene using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. The performance of our previously defined 74-gene signature in predicting the radiation dose to samples in this study was unaffected by differences in gender or smoking status, however, giving 98% correct prediction of dose category. This is the same accuracy as that found in the original study from which the signature was derived, using different donors. CONCLUSION: The results support the development of peripheral blood gene expression as a viable strategy for radiation biodosimetry.
PURPOSE: The issue of potential confounding factors is critical to the development of any approach to radiation biodosimetry, and has not been fully addressed for gene expression-based approaches. MATERIALS AND METHODS: As a step in this direction, we have investigated the effect of smoking on the global radiation gene expression response in ex vivo-irradiated peripheral blood cells using microarray analysis. We also evaluated the ability of gene expression signatures to predict the radiation exposure level of ex vivo-exposed samples from smokers and non-smokers of both genders. RESULTS: We identified eight genes with a radiation response that was significantly affected by smoking status, and confirmed an effect of smoking on the radiation response of the four and a half LIM domains 2 (FHL2) gene using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. The performance of our previously defined 74-gene signature in predicting the radiation dose to samples in this study was unaffected by differences in gender or smoking status, however, giving 98% correct prediction of dose category. This is the same accuracy as that found in the original study from which the signature was derived, using different donors. CONCLUSION: The results support the development of peripheral blood gene expression as a viable strategy for radiation biodosimetry.
Authors: Willmar D Patino; Omar Y Mian; Ju-Gyeong Kang; Satoaki Matoba; Linda D Bartlett; Brenda Holbrook; Hugh H Trout; Louis Kozloff; Paul M Hwang Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-02-22 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Sunirmal Paul; Christopher A Barker; Helen C Turner; Amanda McLane; Suzanne L Wolden; Sally A Amundson Journal: Radiat Res Date: 2011-01-10 Impact factor: 2.841
Authors: Marc Buyse; Sherene Loi; Laura van't Veer; Giuseppe Viale; Mauro Delorenzi; Annuska M Glas; Mahasti Saghatchian d'Assignies; Jonas Bergh; Rosette Lidereau; Paul Ellis; Adrian Harris; Jan Bogaerts; Patrick Therasse; Arno Floore; Mohamed Amakrane; Fanny Piette; Emiel Rutgers; Christos Sotiriou; Fatima Cardoso; Martine J Piccart Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2006-09-06 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Holly K Dressman; Garrett G Muramoto; Nelson J Chao; Sarah Meadows; Dawn Marshall; Geoffrey S Ginsburg; Joseph R Nevins; John P Chute Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Ellina Macaeva; Yvan Saeys; Kevin Tabury; Ann Janssen; Arlette Michaux; Mohammed A Benotmane; Winnok H De Vos; Sarah Baatout; Roel Quintens Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2016-01-14 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Lourdes Cruz-Garcia; Grainne O'Brien; Botond Sipos; Simon Mayes; Michael I Love; Daniel J Turner; Christophe Badie Journal: Radiat Res Date: 2019-12-12 Impact factor: 2.841
Authors: M A Suresh Kumar; Evagelia C Laiakis; Shanaz A Ghandhi; Shad R Morton; Albert J Fornace; Sally A Amundson Journal: Radiat Res Date: 2018-05-10 Impact factor: 2.841
Authors: D S Isubakova; O S Tsymbal; E V Bronikovskaya; N V Litviakov; I V Milto; R М Takhauov Journal: Bull Exp Biol Med Date: 2021-07-23 Impact factor: 0.804
Authors: Helen Budworth; Antoine M Snijders; Francesco Marchetti; Brandon Mannion; Sandhya Bhatnagar; Ely Kwoh; Yuande Tan; Shan X Wang; William F Blakely; Matthew Coleman; Leif Peterson; Andrew J Wyrobek Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-11-07 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Shanaz A Ghandhi; Chao Sima; Waylon M Weber; Dunstana R Melo; Nils Rudqvist; Shad R Morton; Helen C Turner; Sally A Amundson Journal: Radiat Res Date: 2020-11-01 Impact factor: 2.841