Literature DB >> 23446844

Gene expression as a biomarker for human radiation exposure.

Romaica A Omaruddin1, Thomas A Roland, H James Wallace, M Ahmad Chaudhry.   

Abstract

Accidental exposure to ionizing radiation can be unforeseen, rapid, and devastating. The detonation of a radiological device leading to such an exposure can be detrimental to the exposed population. The radiation-induced damage may manifest as acute effects that can be detected clinically or may be more subtle effects that can lead to long-term radiation-induced abnormalities. Accurate identification of the individuals exposed to radiation is challenging. The availability of a rapid and effective screening test that could be used as a biomarker of radiation exposure detection is mandatory. We tested the suitability of alterations in gene expression to serve as a biomarker of human radiation exposure. To develop a useful gene expression biomonitor, however, gene expression changes occurring in response to irradiation in vivo must be measured directly. Patients undergoing radiation therapy provide a suitable test population for this purpose. We examined the expression of CC3, MADH7, and SEC PRO in blood samples of these patients before and after radiotherapy to measure the in vivo response. The gene expression after ionizing radiation treatment varied among different patients, suggesting the complexity of the response. The expression of the SEC PRO gene was repressed in most of the patients. The MADH7 gene was found to be upregulated in most of the subjects and could serve as a molecular marker of radiation exposure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23446844     DOI: 10.1007/s13577-013-0059-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Cell        ISSN: 0914-7470            Impact factor:   4.174


  26 in total

1.  Diminished cellular and humoral immunity in workers occupationally exposed to low levels of ionizing radiation.

Authors:  Ahmet Godekmerdan; Mehmet Ozden; Ahmet Ayar; M Ferit Gursu; Ahmet Tevfik Ozan; Selami Serhatlioglu
Journal:  Arch Med Res       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.235

Review 2.  Current status of biodosimetry based on standard cytogenetic methods.

Authors:  Marcela Maria Pereira de Lemos Pinto; Neyliane Frassinetti Gonçalves Santos; Ademir Amaral
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 3.  Usefulness and limits of biological dosimetry based on cytogenetic methods.

Authors:  A Léonard; J Rueff; G B Gerber; E D Léonard
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 0.972

Review 4.  Bystander effect: biological endpoints and microarray analysis.

Authors:  M Ahmad Chaudhry
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 2.433

5.  Use of a dual-labelled oligonucleotide as a DNA dosemeter for radiological exposure detection.

Authors:  T Wood; B J Lewis; K McDermott; L G I Bennett; K Avarmaa; E C Corcoran; D Wilkinson; A Jones; T Jones; E Kennedy; L Prud'homme-Lalonde; D Boudreau; J-F Gravel; C Drolet; A Kerr; L J Schreiner; J R M Pierre; R Blagoeva; T Veres
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 0.972

Review 6.  Medical response to a major radiologic emergency: a primer for medical and public health practitioners.

Authors:  Anthony B Wolbarst; Albert L Wiley; Jeffrey B Nemhauser; Doran M Christensen; William R Hendee
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Gene expression analysis in radiotherapy patients and C57BL/6 mice as a measure of exposure to ionizing radiation.

Authors:  Ashley N Filiano; Hassan M Fathallah-Shaykh; John Fiveash; Jarrod Gage; Alan Cantor; Sandhya Kharbanda; Martin R Johnson
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 2.841

8.  Gene expression profile of human lymphocytes exposed to (211)At alpha particles.

Authors:  A Turtoi; I Brown; M Schläger; F H A Schneeweiss
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.841

9.  Prediction of in vivo radiation dose status in radiotherapy patients using ex vivo and in vivo gene expression signatures.

Authors:  Sunirmal Paul; Christopher A Barker; Helen C Turner; Amanda McLane; Suzanne L Wolden; Sally A Amundson
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2011-01-10       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 10.  Evolution of the complement system.

Authors:  Masaru Nonaka; Fumiko Yoshizaki
Journal:  Mol Immunol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.407

View more
  4 in total

1.  Gene Expression as a Dosimeter in Irradiated Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Samana Shrestha; Adam Vanasse; Leon N Cooper; Michael P Antosh
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 1.479

2.  Dose-Response Curves of the FDXR and RAD51 Genes with 6 and 18 MV Beam Energies in Human Peripheral Blood Lymphocytes.

Authors:  Alihossein Saberi; Ehsan Khodamoradi; Mohammad Javad Tahmasebi Birgani; Manoochehr Makvandi; Bijan Noori
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 0.611

3.  Effect of 90Sr internal emitter on gene expression in mouse blood.

Authors:  Shanaz A Ghandhi; Waylon Weber; Dunstana Melo; Melanie Doyle-Eisele; Mashkura Chowdhury; Raymond Guilmette; Sally A Amundson
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 3.969

4.  Identification of gene-based responses in human blood cells exposed to alpha particle radiation.

Authors:  Vinita Chauhan; Matthew Howland; Ruth Wilkins
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2014-07-12       Impact factor: 3.063

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.