Literature DB >> 21791536

Baseline left ventricular dP/dtmax rather than the acute improvement in dP/dtmax predicts clinical outcome in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Margot D Bogaard1, Patrick Houthuizen, Frank A Bracke, Pieter A Doevendans, Frits W Prinzen, Mathias Meine, Berry M van Gelder.   

Abstract

AIMS: The maximum rate of left ventricular (LV) pressure rise (dP/dt(max)) has been used to assess the acute haemodynamic effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). We tested the hypothesis that LV dP/dt(max) predicts long-term clinical outcome after initiation of CRT. METHODS AND
RESULTS: This was a retrospective observational multicentre study in 285 patients in whom dP/dt(max) was measured invasively following implantation of a CRT device. The minimum required follow-up was 1 year. We analysed the relationship between dP/dt(max) and time to the composite endpoint, consisting of all-cause mortality, heart transplantation (HTX), or LV assist device (LVAD) implantation within the first year of CRT. Thirty-four events occurred after a mean follow-up of 160 days (range 21-359). Patients with an event had lower dP/dt(max) than patients without an event both at baseline (705 ± 194 vs. 800 ± 222 mmHg/s, P= 0.018) and during CRT (894 ± 224 vs. 985 ± 244 mmHg/s, P= 0.033), but the acute increase in dP/dt(max) was similar in patients with and without an event (190 ± 133 vs. 185 ± 115 mmHg/s, P= n.s.). Left ventricular dP/dt(max)-level at baseline and during CRT both predicted the clinical outcome after adjustment for gender, aetiology and New York Heart Association class: hazard ratio (HR) 0.791 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.658-0.950, P= 0.012] and HR 0.846 (95% CI 0.723-0.991, P= 0.038), respectively.
CONCLUSION: Left ventricular dP/dt(max) measured at baseline and during CRT are predictors of 1-year survival free from all-cause mortality, HTX, or LVAD implantation, but the acute improvement in dP/dt(max) is not correlated to clinical outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21791536     DOI: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfr094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail        ISSN: 1388-9842            Impact factor:   15.534


  22 in total

Review 1.  Current role of echocardiography in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Donato Mele; Matteo Bertini; Michele Malagù; Marianna Nardozza; Roberto Ferrari
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 2.  Cardiac contractility modulation therapy in advanced systolic heart failure.

Authors:  Alexander R Lyon; Michael A Samara; David S Feldman
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 32.419

3.  Cardiac resynchronization therapy update: evolving indications, expanding benefit?

Authors:  C Butcher; Y Mareev; V Markides; M Mason; T Wong; J G F Cleland
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.931

4.  A novel fluoroscopic method of measuring right-to-left interlead distance as a predictor of reverse left ventricular remodeling after cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Gregorio Covino; Mario Volpicelli; Pietro Belli; Gennaro Ratti; Paolo Tammaro; Ciro Provvisiero; Carmine Ciardiello; Luca Auricchio; Ciro Fiorentino; Paolo Capogrosso
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 5.  Strategies to improve cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Kevin Vernooy; Caroline J M van Deursen; Marc Strik; Frits W Prinzen
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 32.419

6.  Non-invasive, model-based measures of ventricular electrical dyssynchrony for predicting CRT outcomes.

Authors:  Christopher T Villongco; David E Krummen; Jeffrey H Omens; Andrew D McCulloch
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 5.214

7.  Acute recoordination rather than functional hemodynamic improvement determines reverse remodelling by cardiac resynchronisation therapy.

Authors:  Philippe C Wouters; Geert E Leenders; Maarten J Cramer; Mathias Meine; Frits W Prinzen; Pieter A Doevendans; Bart W L De Boeck
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 2.357

8.  Vector selection of a quadripolar left ventricular pacing lead affects acute hemodynamic response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: a randomized cross-over trial.

Authors:  Stefan Asbach; Maximilian Hartmann; Tobias Wengenmayer; Erika Graf; Christoph Bode; Juergen Biermann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Evaluating multisite pacing strategies in cardiac resynchronization therapy in the preclinical setting.

Authors:  Luuk I B Heckman; Marion Kuiper; Frederic Anselme; Filippo Ziglio; Nicolas Shan; Markus Jung; Stef Zeemering; Kevin Vernooy; Frits W Prinzen
Journal:  Heart Rhythm O2       Date:  2020-06-15

10.  Analyses of the redistribution of work following cardiac resynchronisation therapy in a patient specific model.

Authors:  Steven Alexander Niederer; Pablo Lamata; Gernot Plank; Phani Chinchapatnam; Matt Ginks; Kawal Rhode; Christopher Aldo Rinaldi; Reza Razavi; Nicolas Peter Smith
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.