| Literature DB >> 33547623 |
Philippe C Wouters1, Geert E Leenders2, Maarten J Cramer2, Mathias Meine2, Frits W Prinzen3, Pieter A Doevendans3, Bart W L De Boeck2,4.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) improves left ventricular (LV) function acutely, with further improvements and reverse remodelling during chronic CRT. The current study investigated the relation between acute improvement of LV systolic function, acute mechanical recoordination, and long-term reverse remodelling after CRT.Entities:
Keywords: CRT; Dyssynchrony; Echocardiography; Heart failure; Reverse remodelling; dP/dt
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33547623 PMCID: PMC8255256 DOI: 10.1007/s10554-021-02174-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging ISSN: 1569-5794 Impact factor: 2.357
Fig. 1Systolic rebound stretch as part of a biphasic response in recoordination. Left ventricular systolic rebound stretch (SRSlv) is calculated as the total amount of systolic stretching that occurs after prematurely terminated shortening during systole (i.e. strain-amplitudes of positive longitudinal strain), averaged over the total number of segments. Compared to baseline, an acute reduction in the amount of systolic rebound stretch (blue; i.e. wasted work) of the left ventricle is seen upon biventricular pacing, without concomitant improvement in systolic shortening (red; i.e. constructive work). Conversely, improvement in systolic shortening becomes apparent after six months of prolonged biventricular stimulation. Note that for illustrative purposes only two segmental strain curves, both of the septum (solid lines) and lateral wall (dashed lines), are displayed for a representative CRT responder
Fig. 2Evolution of discoordination and left ventricular hemodynamic function stratified according to response. Mean and standard deviation values of discoordination (upper panels) and parameters of left ventricular hemodynamic function and dimensions (lower panels). Results are shown before, directly after and six months after CRT (black, shaded, and white bars, respectively) in responders and non-responders. Note that acutely after CRT, coordination improves by reduction of systolic stretch, whereas during long-term follow-up systolic stretch remains stable but systolic shortening improves in responders. ISF, internal stretch fraction; SRSlv, systolic rebound stretch of the septum; dP/dtmax, maximum rate of LV pressure rise; SV, stroke volume; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; LVESV, LV end-systolic-volume
Relation of acute improvements with reverse remodelling and changes in LVEF (n = 25)
| Parameter | 6-months ∆LVESV (%) | 6-months ∆LVEF (%-point) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R | p-value | R | p-value | |
| Acute recoordination | ||||
| ∆ISF (%-point) | 0.601 | < 0.001 | 0.578 | 0.002 |
| ∆Systolic stretch (%-point) | 0.676 | < 0.001 | 0.628 | < 0.001 |
| ∆SRSlv (%-point) | 0.765 | < 0.001 | 0.694 | < 0.001 |
| Acute resynchronisation | ||||
| ∆IVMD (ms) | 0.133 | 0.554 | 0.140 | 0.535 |
| ∆2D-SD18 (ms) | 0.500 | 0.011 | 0.451 | 0.023 |
| ∆QRS (ms) | 0.188 | 0.368 | 0.131 | 0.533 |
| Acute improvement of systolic function | ||||
| ∆dP/dtmax (%) | 0.251 | 0.277 | 0.173 | 0.409 |
| ∆SV (%) | 0.047 | 0.830 | 0.250 | 0.249 |
| ∆LVEF (%-point) | 0.237 | 0.265 | 0.392 | 0.077 |
For a uniform representation, all changes ∆ express a physiologic improvement, i.e. decrements for discoordination & dyssynchrony parameters, and increments for function parameters such that relations are positive if both parameters improve
Abbreviations: ISF internal stretch fraction, SRSlv left ventricular systolic rebound stretch, 2DS-SD18 standard deviation of time to peak strain, IVMD interventricular mechanical delay, LVEDV left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic volume, LVESV, LV end-systolic volume, SV stroke volume, LVEF, LV ejection fraction, dP/dtmax, maximum rate of LV pressure rise
Fig. 3Visual abstract summarizing the main study methods and results. Biventricular (BiV) pacing elicited an acute LV functional response, reflected by an acute increase (∆) in invasively determined LV dP/dtmax (top left panel). BiV pacing also induced acute recoordination of LV deformation (top right panel), predominantly characterised by acute reduction (∆) in paradoxical systolic rebound stretch of the LV (SRSlv). As such, a smaller fraction of the work that was performed during systole was internally wasted by segments paradoxically stretching. This ensues in a lower internal strain fraction (ISF, not displayed), thereby signifying higher efficiency. When comparing acute improvements in LV systolic function and acute recoordination, the parameter most strongly related to reverse remodelling was the extent of acute recoordination, and not acute hemodynamic response