PURPOSE: In spite of technological breakthroughs, the choice of a suitable location for the coronary sinus (CS) lead in biventricular implants is still mostly empiric. The aim of this study was to investigate the utility of a radiological index-the distance between the right ventricular (RV) and CS lead tips on fluoroscopic recordings, measured by means of a new method-as a tool for selecting the most profitable left ventricular (LV) lead position. METHODS: Forty-nine consecutive patients (36 male, 13female; mean age 63 ± 19 year), in whom the LV electrode was implanted in a lateral/postero-lateral position in the CS, were evaluated immediately after implantation. The fluoroscopic distances between the RV and LV lead tips were calculated off-line in antero-posterior (2DAP) and latero-lateral (2DLL) projections by means of integrated software. RESULTS: On 1-year follow-up evaluation, 53 % patients were classed as responders (R) (>15 % reduction in LV end-systolic volume) and 47 % as non-responders (NR). On receiver-operating curve analysis, 2DAP and 2DLL showed cut-off values of 81 mm and 51 mm, respectively. In discriminating between R and NR, 2DAP >81 mm displayed 95 % specificity and 74 % sensitivity, while 2DLL >51 mm displayed 74 % specificity and 92 % sensitivity. On multivariate analysis, the cut-off values of 2DAP and 2DLL were significantly predictive of R to CRT. CONCLUSIONS: In our single-center prospective experience, RV-LV interlead distance measured by means of a novel method on fluorographic recordings correlated with CRT response. The use of this method as an intra-operative guide to identifying suitable lead placement in the CS needs evaluating on-line and on a large scale.
PURPOSE: In spite of technological breakthroughs, the choice of a suitable location for the coronary sinus (CS) lead in biventricular implants is still mostly empiric. The aim of this study was to investigate the utility of a radiological index-the distance between the right ventricular (RV) and CS lead tips on fluoroscopic recordings, measured by means of a new method-as a tool for selecting the most profitable left ventricular (LV) lead position. METHODS: Forty-nine consecutive patients (36 male, 13female; mean age 63 ± 19 year), in whom the LV electrode was implanted in a lateral/postero-lateral position in the CS, were evaluated immediately after implantation. The fluoroscopic distances between the RV and LV lead tips were calculated off-line in antero-posterior (2DAP) and latero-lateral (2DLL) projections by means of integrated software. RESULTS: On 1-year follow-up evaluation, 53 % patients were classed as responders (R) (>15 % reduction in LV end-systolic volume) and 47 % as non-responders (NR). On receiver-operating curve analysis, 2DAP and 2DLL showed cut-off values of 81 mm and 51 mm, respectively. In discriminating between R and NR, 2DAP >81 mm displayed 95 % specificity and 74 % sensitivity, while 2DLL >51 mm displayed 74 % specificity and 92 % sensitivity. On multivariate analysis, the cut-off values of 2DAP and 2DLL were significantly predictive of R to CRT. CONCLUSIONS: In our single-center prospective experience, RV-LV interlead distance measured by means of a novel method on fluorographic recordings correlated with CRT response. The use of this method as an intra-operative guide to identifying suitable lead placement in the CS needs evaluating on-line and on a large scale.
Authors: John J V McMurray; Stamatis Adamopoulos; Stefan D Anker; Angelo Auricchio; Michael Böhm; Kenneth Dickstein; Volkmar Falk; Gerasimos Filippatos; Cândida Fonseca; Miguel Angel Gomez-Sanchez; Tiny Jaarsma; Lars Køber; Gregory Y H Lip; Aldo Pietro Maggioni; Alexander Parkhomenko; Burkert M Pieske; Bogdan A Popescu; Per K Rønnevik; Frans H Rutten; Juerg Schwitter; Petar Seferovic; Janina Stepinska; Pedro T Trindade; Adriaan A Voors; Faiez Zannad; Andreas Zeiher Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2012-05-19 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: E Kevin Heist; Dali Fan; Theofanie Mela; Daniel Arzola-Castaner; Vivek Y Reddy; Moussa Mansour; Michael H Picard; Jeremy N Ruskin; Jagmeet P Singh Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2005-09-01 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: John G F Cleland; Jean-Claude Daubert; Erland Erdmann; Nick Freemantle; Daniel Gras; Lukas Kappenberger; Luigi Tavazzi Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-03-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Christophe Leclercq; Owen Faris; Richard Tunin; Jennifer Johnson; Ritsuchi Kato; Frank Evans; Julio Spinelli; Henry Halperin; Elliot McVeigh; David A Kass Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-10-01 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Prabhat Kumar; Gaurav A Upadhyay; Christine Cavaliere-Ogus; E Kevin Heist; Robert K Altman; Neal A Chatterjee; Kimberly A Parks; Jagmeet P Singh Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2012-12-21 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Michael R Gold; Ulrika Birgersdotter-Green; Jagmeet P Singh; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; Yinghong Yu; Timothy E Meyer; Milan Seth; Patrick J Tchou Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2011-08-29 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Stian Ross; Hans Henrik Odland; Trent Fischer; Thor Edvardsen; Lars Ove Gammelsrud; Trine Fink Haland; Richard Cornelussen; Einar Hopp; Erik Kongsgaard Journal: Open Heart Date: 2018-12-10