Literature DB >> 28011837

Non-invasive, model-based measures of ventricular electrical dyssynchrony for predicting CRT outcomes.

Christopher T Villongco1,2, David E Krummen2,3, Jeffrey H Omens1,2, Andrew D McCulloch4,2.   

Abstract

AIMS: Left ventricular activation delay due to left bundle branch block (LBBB) is an important determinant of the severity of dyssynchronous heart failure (DHF). We investigated whether patient-specific computational models constructed from non-invasive measurements can provide measures of baseline dyssynchrony and its reduction after CRT that may explain the degree of long-term reverse ventricular remodelling. METHODS AND
RESULTS: LV end-systolic volume reduction (ΔESVLV) measured by 2D trans-thoracic echocardiography in eight patients following 6 months of CRT was significantly (P < 0.05) greater in responders (26 ± 20%, n = 4) than non-responders (11 ± 16%, n = 4). LV reverse remodelling did not correlate with baseline QRS duration or its change after biventricular pacing, but did correlate with baseline LV endocardial activation measured by electroanatomic mapping (R2 = 0.71, P < 0.01). Patient-specific models of LBBB ventricular activation with parameters obtained by matching model-computed vectorcardiograms (VCG) to those derived from standard patient ECGs yielded LV endocardial activation times that correlated well with those measured from endocardial maps (R2 = 0.90). Model-computed 3D LV activation times correlated strongly with the reduction in LVESV (R2 = 0.93, P < 0.001). Computed decreases due to simulated CRT in the time delay between LV septal and lateral activation correlated strongly with ΔESVLV (R2 = 0.92, P < 0.001). Models also suggested that optimizing VV delays may improve resynchronization by this measure of activation delay.
CONCLUSIONS: Patient-specific computational models constructed from non-invasive measurements can compute estimates of LV dyssynchrony and their changes after CRT that may be as good as or better than electroanatomic mapping for predicting long-term reverse remodelling. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author 2016. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac resynchronization therapy; Computational modelling; Electroanatomic mapping; Heart failure; Left bundle branch block; Vectorcardiogram

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28011837      PMCID: PMC5225967          DOI: 10.1093/europace/euw356

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Europace        ISSN: 1099-5129            Impact factor:   5.214


  32 in total

1.  Effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy on reverse remodeling and relation to outcome: multicenter automatic defibrillator implantation trial: cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Scott D Solomon; Elyse Foster; Mikhail Bourgoun; Amil Shah; Esperanza Viloria; Mary W Brown; W Jackson Hall; Marc A Pfeffer; Arthur J Moss
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Log-Euclidean metrics for fast and simple calculus on diffusion tensors.

Authors:  Vincent Arsigny; Pierre Fillard; Xavier Pennec; Nicholas Ayache
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Redistribution of myocardial fiber strain and blood flow by asynchronous activation.

Authors:  F W Prinzen; C H Augustijn; T Arts; M A Allessie; R S Reneman
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1990-08

4.  Reconstruction of the Frank vectorcardiogram from standard electrocardiographic leads: diagnostic comparison of different methods.

Authors:  J A Kors; G van Herpen; A C Sittig; J H van Bemmel
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 29.983

5.  Left ventricular reverse remodeling but not clinical improvement predicts long-term survival after cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Cheuk-Man Yu; Gabe B Bleeker; Jeffrey Wing-Hong Fung; Martin J Schalij; Qing Zhang; Ernst E van der Wall; Yat-Sun Chan; Shun-Ling Kong; Jeroen J Bax
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-09-06       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Variable patterns of septal activation in patients with left bundle branch block and heart failure.

Authors:  Luz-Maria Rodriguez; Carl Timmermans; Ashish Nabar; Graydon Beatty; Hein J J Wellens
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2003-02

7.  A prospective comparison of echocardiography and device algorithms for atrioventricular and interventricular interval optimization in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Ravindu Kamdar; Evelyn Frain; Fiona Warburton; Laura Richmond; Victoria Mullan; Thomas Berriman; Glyn Thomas; Joanna Tenkorang; Mehul Dhinoja; Mark Earley; Simon Sporton; Richard Schilling
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.214

8.  Systolic improvement and mechanical resynchronization does not require electrical synchrony in the dilated failing heart with left bundle-branch block.

Authors:  Christophe Leclercq; Owen Faris; Richard Tunin; Jennifer Johnson; Ritsuchi Kato; Frank Evans; Julio Spinelli; Henry Halperin; Elliot McVeigh; David A Kass
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Electrical dyssynchrony induced by biventricular pacing: implications for patient selection and therapy improvement.

Authors:  Sylvain Ploux; Romain Eschalier; Zachary I Whinnett; Joost Lumens; Nicolas Derval; Frederic Sacher; Mélèze Hocini; Pierre Jaïs; Remi Dubois; Philippe Ritter; Michel Haïssaguerre; Bruce L Wilkoff; Darrel P Francis; Pierre Bordachar
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2014-12-26       Impact factor: 6.343

10.  Patient-Specific Models of Cardiac Biomechanics.

Authors:  Adarsh Krishnamurthy; Christopher T Villongco; Joyce Chuang; Lawrence R Frank; Vishal Nigam; Ernest Belezzuoli; Paul Stark; David E Krummen; Sanjiv Narayan; Jeffrey H Omens; Andrew D McCulloch; Roy Cp Kerckhoffs
Journal:  J Comput Phys       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 3.553

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Atlas-Based Computational Analysis of Heart Shape and Function in Congenital Heart Disease.

Authors:  Kathleen Gilbert; Nickolas Forsch; Sanjeet Hegde; Charlene Mauger; Jeffrey H Omens; James C Perry; Beau Pontré; Avan Suinesiaputra; Alistair A Young; Andrew D McCulloch
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy based on a cardiac electromechanics-perfusion computational model.

Authors:  Lei Fan; Jenny S Choy; Farshad Raissi; Ghassan S Kassab; Lik Chuan Lee
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 4.589

Review 3.  Exploring cardiac form and function: A length-scale computational biology approach.

Authors:  William F Sherman; Anna Grosberg
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med       Date:  2019-12-02

4.  Atlas-based methods for efficient characterization of patient-specific ventricular activation patterns.

Authors:  Kevin P Vincent; Nickolas Forsch; Sachin Govil; Jake M Joblon; Jeffrey H Omens; James C Perry; Andrew D McCulloch
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 5.214

Review 5.  Computational Modeling for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

Authors:  Angela W C Lee; Caroline Mendonca Costa; Marina Strocchi; Christopher A Rinaldi; Steven A Niederer
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  A rule-based method for predicting the electrical activation of the heart with cardiac resynchronization therapy from non-invasive clinical data.

Authors:  A W C Lee; U C Nguyen; O Razeghi; J Gould; B S Sidhu; B Sieniewicz; J Behar; M Mafi-Rad; G Plank; F W Prinzen; C A Rinaldi; K Vernooy; S Niederer
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 8.545

7.  Machine Learning Prediction of Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy Response From Combination of Clinical and Model-Driven Data.

Authors:  Svyatoslav Khamzin; Arsenii Dokuchaev; Anastasia Bazhutina; Tatiana Chumarnaya; Stepan Zubarev; Tamara Lyubimtseva; Viktoria Lebedeva; Dmitry Lebedev; Viatcheslav Gurev; Olga Solovyova
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 4.566

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.