Literature DB >> 12198701

The utility of radiological imaging in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Sherif Saadeh1, Zobair M Younossi, Erick M Remer, Terry Gramlich, Janus P Ong, Maja Hurley, Kevin D Mullen, James N Cooper, Michael J Sheridan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: This prospective study evaluates the role of radiological modalities in establishing the diagnosis of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH).
METHODS: Consecutive patients with biopsy-proven nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) were enrolled (2000-2001). Patients with other liver diseases and significant alcohol consumption (>20 g/day) were excluded. Clinicodemographic data were gathered at the time of liver biopsy. Each biopsy specimen was assessed by a hepatopathologist. Each patient underwent a limited abdominal ultrasonography (US), computerized tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Films were interpreted by a radiologist who used a predetermined radiological protocol. Each radiological study was reread by the same radiologist and a second radiologist.
RESULTS: Patients with NASH had greater aspartate aminotransferase levels (P = 0.03), greater ferritin levels (P = 0.05), more hepatocyte ballooning (P < 0.0001), and more fibrosis (P = 0.002). None of the radiological features distinguished between NASH and other types of NAFLD. No radiological modality detected the presence of hepatocyte ballooning, Mallory's hyaline, or fibrosis, which are important features in the diagnosis of NASH. The presence of >33% fat on liver biopsy was optimal for detecting steatosis on radiological imaging.
CONCLUSIONS: Differences between NASH and nonprogressive NAFLD were not apparent with any radiological modality. Of the pathologic features important for establishing the diagnosis of NASH, only the severity of steatosis was reflected in these radiological modalities. Good intraobserver agreement was evident for each modality (US, CT, and MRI) that was superior to interobserver agreement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12198701     DOI: 10.1053/gast.2002.35354

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterology        ISSN: 0016-5085            Impact factor:   22.682


  510 in total

1.  A biomarker panel for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and NASH-related fibrosis.

Authors:  Zobair M Younossi; Sandra Page; Nila Rafiq; Aybike Birerdinc; Maria Stepanova; Noreen Hossain; Arian Afendy; Zahra Younoszai; Zachary Goodman; Ancha Baranova
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Decreased accumulation of ultrasound contrast in the liver of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis rat model.

Authors:  Yuki Miyata; Takeo Miyahara; Fuminori Moriyasu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  The utility of Xenon-133 liver scan in the diagnosis and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Authors:  Said A Al-Busafi; Peter Ghali; Philip Wong; Javier A Novales-Diaz; Marc Deschênes
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.522

4.  To perform or not to perform liver biopsy: an alternative view.

Authors:  D Joy; B B Scott
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  To perform or not to perform liver biopsy: an alternative view.

Authors:  R W Chapman
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 6.  Quantitative Assessment of Liver Fat with Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Spectroscopy.

Authors:  Scott B Reeder; Irene Cruite; Gavin Hamilton; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 7.  Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a diabetologist's perspective.

Authors:  Joseph M Pappachan; Farrah A Antonio; Mahamood Edavalath; Arjun Mukherjee
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 3.633

8.  Evaluation of diffuse liver steatosis by ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging: which modality is best?

Authors:  Aliya Qayyum; Daryl M Chen; Richard S Breiman; Antonio C Westphalen; Benjamin M Yeh; Kirk D Jones; Ying Lu; Fergus V Coakley; Peter W Callen
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.605

Review 9.  Liver fat imaging-a clinical overview of ultrasound, CT, and MR imaging.

Authors:  Yingzhen N Zhang; Kathryn J Fowler; Gavin Hamilton; Jennifer Y Cui; Ethan Z Sy; Michelle Balanay; Jonathan C Hooker; Nikolaus Szeverenyi; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Comparison of fatty liver index with noninvasive methods for steatosis detection and quantification.

Authors:  Shira Zelber-Sagi; Muriel Webb; Nimer Assy; Laurie Blendis; Hanny Yeshua; Moshe Leshno; Vlad Ratziu; Zamir Halpern; Ran Oren; Erwin Santo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.