Literature DB >> 34124922

Audiovisual speech is more than the sum of its parts: Auditory-visual superadditivity compensates for age-related declines in audible and lipread speech intelligibility.

James W Dias1, Carolyn M McClaskey1, Kelly C Harris1.   

Abstract

Multisensory input can improve perception of ambiguous unisensory information. For example, speech heard in noise can be more accurately identified when listeners see a speaker's articulating face. Importantly, these multisensory effects can be superadditive to listeners' ability to process unisensory speech, such that audiovisual speech identification is better than the sum of auditory-only and visual-only speech identification. Age-related declines in auditory and visual speech perception have been hypothesized to be concomitant with stronger cross-sensory influences on audiovisual speech identification, but little evidence exists to support this. Currently, studies do not account for the multisensory superadditive benefit of auditory-visual input in their metrics of the auditory or visual influence on audiovisual speech perception. Here we treat multisensory superadditivity as independent from unisensory auditory and visual processing. In the current investigation, older and younger adults identified auditory, visual, and audiovisual speech in noisy listening conditions. Performance across these conditions was used to compute conventional metrics of the auditory and visual influence on audiovisual speech identification and a metric of auditory-visual superadditivity. Consistent with past work, auditory and visual speech identification declined with age, audiovisual speech identification was preserved, and no age-related differences in the auditory or visual influence on audiovisual speech identification were observed. However, we found that auditory-visual superadditivity improved with age. The novel findings suggest that multisensory superadditivity is independent of unisensory processing. As auditory and visual speech identification decline with age, compensatory changes in multisensory superadditivity may preserve audiovisual speech identification in older adults. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34124922      PMCID: PMC8427734          DOI: 10.1037/pag0000613

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Aging        ISSN: 0882-7974


  41 in total

1.  The principle of inverse effectiveness in multisensory integration: some statistical considerations.

Authors:  Nicholas P Holmes
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 3.020

2.  Auditory-visual speech perception and aging.

Authors:  Kathleen M Cienkowski; Arlene Earley Carney
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 3.  Crossmodal influences on visual perception.

Authors:  Ladan Shams; Robyn Kim
Journal:  Phys Life Rev       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Older age results in difficulties separating auditory and visual signals in time.

Authors:  Yu Man Chan; Michael J Pianta; Allison M McKendrick
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Age-related differences in inhibitory control predict audiovisual speech perception.

Authors:  Avanti Dey; Mitchell S Sommers
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2015-06-29

6.  Audiovisual asynchrony detection and speech intelligibility in noise with moderate to severe sensorineural hearing impairment.

Authors:  Deniz Başkent; Danny Bazo
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Changes in multisensory integration across the life span.

Authors:  Jessica L Parker; Christopher W Robinson
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2018-05

8.  Effects of age and mild hearing loss on speech recognition in noise.

Authors:  J R Dubno; D D Dirks; D E Morgan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Age-group differences in speech identification despite matched audiometrically normal hearing: contributions from auditory temporal processing and cognition.

Authors:  Christian Füllgrabe; Brian C J Moore; Michael A Stone
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 5.750

10.  The Principle of Inverse Effectiveness in Audiovisual Speech Perception.

Authors:  Luuk P H van de Rijt; Anja Roye; Emmanuel A M Mylanus; A John van Opstal; Marc M van Wanrooij
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  2 in total

1.  Early auditory cortical processing predicts auditory speech in noise identification and lipreading.

Authors:  James W Dias; Carolyn M McClaskey; Kelly C Harris
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2021-08-30       Impact factor: 3.054

Review 2.  Lipreading: A Review of Its Continuing Importance for Speech Recognition With an Acquired Hearing Loss and Possibilities for Effective Training.

Authors:  Lynne E Bernstein; Nicole Jordan; Edward T Auer; Silvio P Eberhardt
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 1.636

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.