Shreyas S Vasanawala1, Frandics P Chan, Beverley Newman, Marcus T Alley. 1. Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, 725 Welch Road, Room 1679, Stanford, CA 94305-5913, USA. vasanawala@stanford.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Contrast-enhanced cardiac MRA suffers from cardiac motion artifacts and often requires a breath-hold. OBJECTIVE: This work develops and evaluates a blood pool contrast-enhanced combined respiratory- and ECG-triggered MRA method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An SPGR sequence was modified to enable combined cardiac and respiratory triggering on a 1.5-T scanner. Twenty-three consecutive children referred for pediatric heart disease receiving gadofosveset were recruited in HIPAA-compliant fashion with IRB approval and informed consent. Children underwent standard non-triggered contrast-enhanced MRA with or without suspended respiration. Additionally, a free-breathing-triggered MRA was acquired. Triggered and non-triggered studies were presented in blinded random order independently to two radiologists twice. Anatomical structure delineation was graded for each triggered and non-triggered acquisition and the visual quality on triggered MRA was compared directly to that on non-triggered MRA. RESULTS: Triggered images received higher scores from each radiologist for all anatomical structures on each of the two reading sessions (Wilcoxon rank sum test, P < 0.05). In direct comparison, triggered images were preferred over non-triggered images for delineating cardiac structures, with most comparisons reaching statistical significance (binomial test, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Combined cardiac and respiratory triggering, enabled by a blood pool contrast agent, improves delineation of most anatomical structures in pediatric cardiovascular MRA.
BACKGROUND: Contrast-enhanced cardiac MRA suffers from cardiac motion artifacts and often requires a breath-hold. OBJECTIVE: This work develops and evaluates a blood pool contrast-enhanced combined respiratory- and ECG-triggered MRA method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An SPGR sequence was modified to enable combined cardiac and respiratory triggering on a 1.5-T scanner. Twenty-three consecutive children referred for pediatric heart disease receiving gadofosveset were recruited in HIPAA-compliant fashion with IRB approval and informed consent. Children underwent standard non-triggered contrast-enhanced MRA with or without suspended respiration. Additionally, a free-breathing-triggered MRA was acquired. Triggered and non-triggered studies were presented in blinded random order independently to two radiologists twice. Anatomical structure delineation was graded for each triggered and non-triggered acquisition and the visual quality on triggered MRA was compared directly to that on non-triggered MRA. RESULTS: Triggered images received higher scores from each radiologist for all anatomical structures on each of the two reading sessions (Wilcoxon rank sum test, P < 0.05). In direct comparison, triggered images were preferred over non-triggered images for delineating cardiac structures, with most comparisons reaching statistical significance (binomial test, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Combined cardiac and respiratory triggering, enabled by a blood pool contrast agent, improves delineation of most anatomical structures in pediatric cardiovascular MRA.
Authors: R B Lauffer; D J Parmelee; H S Ouellet; R P Dolan; H Sajiki; D M Scott; P J Bernard; E M Buchanan; K Y Ong; Z Tyeklár; K S Midelfort; T J McMurry; R C Walovitch Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 1996-08 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: M Stuber; R M Botnar; P G Danias; M V McConnell; K V Kissinger; E K Yucel; W J Manning Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 1999-11 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: T M Grist; F R Korosec; D C Peters; S Witte; R C Walovitch; R P Dolan; W E Bridson; E K Yucel; C A Mistretta Journal: Radiology Date: 1998-05 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: P Lanzer; E H Botvinick; N B Schiller; L E Crooks; M Arakawa; L Kaufman; P L Davis; R Herfkens; M J Lipton; C B Higgins Journal: Radiology Date: 1984-01 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Claas P Naehle; Michael Kaestner; Andreas Müller; Winfried W Willinek; Juergen Gieseke; Hans H Schild; Daniel Thomas Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2010-05
Authors: Moritz Wagner; Matthias Rief; Patrick Asbach; Thomas Vogtmann; Alexander Huppertz; Mark Beling; Craig Butler; Michael Laule; Carsten Warmuth; Matthias Taupitz; Bernd Hamm; Alexander Lembcke Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2009-05-21 Impact factor: 3.528
Authors: Mieke M P Driessen; Johannes M P J Breur; Ricardo P J Budde; Joep W M van Oorschot; Roland R J van Kimmenade; Gertjan Tj Sieswerda; Folkert J Meijboom; Tim Leiner Journal: Pediatr Radiol Date: 2015-01-01
Authors: Christopher Z Lam; Joseph J Pagano; Navjot Gill; Logi Vidarsson; Regina de la Mora; Mike Seed; Lars Grosse-Wortmann; Shi-Joon Yoo Journal: Pediatr Radiol Date: 2018-11-15