AIM: Imaging of the left atrium is regularly performed prior to pulmonary vein isolation. The aim of the study was to evaluate the feasibility of contrast-enhanced high-resolution magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) of the left atrium using the blood-pool contrast agent gadofosveset trisodium in comparison to noncontrast MRA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty consecutive patients were examined by free-breathing electrocardiogram-gated whole-heart MRA (reconstructed spatial resolution, 0.7mm x 0.6mm x 0.8mm) with a noncontrast T2-prepared steady state free precession sequence (T2-prep SSFP) and a gadofosveset trisodium-enhanced inversion-recovery SSFP sequence (CE IR-SSFP). Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of blood in the left atrium was determined. Depiction of the left atrium was rated by two radiologists in consensus. A cardiologist segmented the MR data sets and rated depiction of the left atrium. RESULTS: Five of 20 patients had irregular breathing patterns with navigator efficiency less than 35% and were excluded from evaluation. CNR was significantly higher for CE IR-SSFP compared with T2-prep SSFP (18.4+/-5.3 vs. 11.7+/-3.5, p<0.01). Depiction of the left atrium by T2-prep SSFP was rated as good in four patients, moderate in ten patients, and poor in one patient, whereas depiction of the left atrium by CE IR-SSFP was rated as excellent in nine patients, good in four patients, and moderate in two patients. CE IR-SSFP allowed for semiautomated segmentation of the left atrium in 15 patients, whereas T2-prep SSFP allowed for segmentation only in ten patients. CONCLUSION: Gadofosveset trisodium-enhanced MRA of the left atrium is feasible with significantly improved image quality compared to noncontrast MRA. Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
AIM: Imaging of the left atrium is regularly performed prior to pulmonary vein isolation. The aim of the study was to evaluate the feasibility of contrast-enhanced high-resolution magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) of the left atrium using the blood-pool contrast agent gadofosvesettrisodium in comparison to noncontrast MRA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty consecutive patients were examined by free-breathing electrocardiogram-gated whole-heart MRA (reconstructed spatial resolution, 0.7mm x 0.6mm x 0.8mm) with a noncontrast T2-prepared steady state free precession sequence (T2-prep SSFP) and a gadofosvesettrisodium-enhanced inversion-recovery SSFP sequence (CE IR-SSFP). Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of blood in the left atrium was determined. Depiction of the left atrium was rated by two radiologists in consensus. A cardiologist segmented the MR data sets and rated depiction of the left atrium. RESULTS: Five of 20 patients had irregular breathing patterns with navigator efficiency less than 35% and were excluded from evaluation. CNR was significantly higher for CE IR-SSFP compared with T2-prep SSFP (18.4+/-5.3 vs. 11.7+/-3.5, p<0.01). Depiction of the left atrium by T2-prep SSFP was rated as good in four patients, moderate in ten patients, and poor in one patient, whereas depiction of the left atrium by CE IR-SSFP was rated as excellent in nine patients, good in four patients, and moderate in two patients. CE IR-SSFP allowed for semiautomated segmentation of the left atrium in 15 patients, whereas T2-prep SSFP allowed for segmentation only in ten patients. CONCLUSION:Gadofosvesettrisodium-enhanced MRA of the left atrium is feasible with significantly improved image quality compared to noncontrast MRA. Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors: Fabio S Raman; Marcelo S Nacif; George Cater; Neville Gai; Jacquin Jones; Debiao Li; Christopher T Sibley; Songtao Liu; David A Bluemke Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2013-03-21 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Johannes Siebermair; Eugene G Kholmovski; Douglas Sheffer; Joyce Schroeder; Leif Jensen; Mobin Kheirkhahan; Alex A Baher; Majd M Ibrahim; Theresa Reiter; Tienush Rassaf; Reza Wakili; Nassir F Marrouche; Christopher J McGann; Brent D Wilson Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2021-06-11 Impact factor: 3.629
Authors: Mark A Ahlman; Fabio S Raman; Scott R Penzak; Jianing Pang; Zhaoyang Fan; Songtao Liu; Neville Gai; Debiao Li; David A Bluemke Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord Date: 2015-12-22 Impact factor: 2.298
Authors: John D Groarke; Alfonso H Waller; Tomas S Vita; Gregory F Michaud; Marcelo F Di Carli; Ron Blankstein; Raymond Y Kwong; Michael Steigner Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2014-06-19 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Marcelo Souto Nacif; Fabio S Raman; Neville Gai; Jacquin Jones; Rob J van der Geest; Christopher T Sibley; Songtao Liu; A Bluemke David Journal: Radiol Bras Date: 2018 Jan-Feb