Literature DB >> 21784685

QA of dynamic MLC based on EPID portal dosimetry.

J Richart1, M C Pujades, J Perez-Calatayud, D Granero, F Ballester, S Rodriguez, M Santos.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Dynamic delivery of intensity modulated beams (dIMRT) requires not only accurate verification of leaf positioning but also a control on the speed of motion. The latter is a parameter that has a major impact on the dose delivered to the patient. Time consumed in quality assurance (QA) procedures is an issue of relevance in any radiotherapy department. Electronic portal imaging dosimetry (EPID) can be very efficient for routine tests. The purpose of this work is to investigate the ability of our EPID for detecting small errors in leaf positioning, and to present our daily QA procedures for dIMRT based on EPID. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A Varian 2100 CD Clinac equipped with an 80 leaf Millennium MLC and with amorphous silicon based EPID (aS500, Varian) is used. The daily QA program consists in performing: Stability check of the EPID signal, Garden fence test, Sweeping slit test, and Leaf speed test. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The EPID system exhibits good long term reproducibility. The mean portal dose at the centre of a 10 × 10 cm(2) static field was 1.002 ± 0.004 (range 1.013-0.995) for the period evaluated of 47 weeks. Garden fence test shows that leaf position errors of up to 0.2 mm can be detected. With the Sweeping slit test we are able to detect small deviations on the gap width and errors of individual leaves of 0.5 and 0.2 mm. With the Leaf speed test problems due to motor fatigue or friction between leaves can be detected.
CONCLUSIONS: This set of tests takes no longer than 5 min in the linac treatment room. With EPID dosimetry, a consistent daily QA program can be applied, giving complete information about positioning/speed MLC.
Copyright © 2011 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21784685     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2011.06.046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med        ISSN: 1120-1797            Impact factor:   2.685


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of MLC positioning deviations using log files and establishment of specific assessment parameters for different accelerators with IMRT and VMAT.

Authors:  Xiutong Lin; Tao Sun; Xiao Liu; Guifang Zhang; Yong Yin
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-07-16       Impact factor: 4.309

2.  Multi-parametric Improvements in the CCD Camera-based EPID for Portal Dosimetry.

Authors:  Vahideh Nazari; Seied R Mahdavi; Ahmad Mostaar; Hassan Nedaei; Mohammad A Mosleh Shirazi; Alireza Nikoofar; Golbarg Esmailie
Journal:  J Med Signals Sens       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar

3.  Comparison of MLC error sensitivity of various commercial devices for VMAT pre-treatment quality assurance.

Authors:  Masahide Saito; Naoki Sano; Yuki Shibata; Kengo Kuriyama; Takafumi Komiyama; Kan Marino; Shinichi Aoki; Kazunari Ashizawa; Kazuya Yoshizawa; Hiroshi Onishi
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-03-03       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  An EPID-based system for gantry-resolved MLC quality assurance for VMAT.

Authors:  Benjamin J Zwan; Michael P Barnes; Todsaporn Fuangord; Cameron J Stanton; Daryl J O'Connor; Paul J Keall; Peter B Greer
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Commissioning and quality assurance of HalcyonTM 2.0 linear accelerator.

Authors:  Pushpraj K Pathak; S K Vashisht; S Baby; P K Jithin; Y Jain; R Mahawar; V G G K Sharan
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2021-06-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.