Literature DB >> 21780096

Establishing common cost measures to evaluate the economic value of patient navigation programs.

Elizabeth Whitley1, Patricia Valverde, Kristen Wells, Loretta Williams, Taylor Teschner, Ya-Chen Tina Shih.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patient navigation is an intervention aimed at reducing barriers to health care for underserved populations as a means to reduce cancer health disparities. Despite the proliferation of patient navigation programs across the United States, information related to the economic impact and sustainability of these programs is lacking.
METHODS: After a review of the relevant literature, the Health Services Research (HSR)-Cost workgroup of the American Cancer Society National Patient Navigator Leadership Summit met to examine cost data relevant to assessing the economic impact of patient navigation and to propose common cost metrics.
RESULTS: Recognizing that resources available for data collection, management, and analysis vary, 5 categories of core and optional cost measures were identified related to patient navigator programs, including program costs, human capital costs, direct medical costs, direct non-medical costs, and indirect costs.
CONCLUSIONS: Information demonstrating economic as well as clinical value is necessary to make decisions about sustainability of patient navigation programs. Adoption of these common cost metrics are recommended to promote understanding of the economic impact of patient navigation and comparability across diverse patient navigation programs.
Copyright © 2011 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21780096      PMCID: PMC3151018          DOI: 10.1002/cncr.26268

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  15 in total

1.  The validity and reproducibility of a work productivity and activity impairment instrument.

Authors:  M C Reilly; A S Zbrozek; E M Dukes
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Collecting direct non-health care and time cost data: application to screening and diagnosis of cervical cancer.

Authors:  Scott B Cantor; Lawrence B Levy; Marylou Cárdenas-Turanzas; Karen Basen-Engquist; Tao Le; J Robert Beck; Michele Follen
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.583

3.  Principles of good practice for budget impact analysis: report of the ISPOR Task Force on good research practices--budget impact analysis.

Authors:  Josephine A Mauskopf; Sean D Sullivan; Lieven Annemans; Jaime Caro; C Daniel Mullins; Mark Nuijten; Ewa Orlewska; John Watkins; Paul Trueman
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.725

Review 4.  Economic evaluations of medical care interventions for cancer patients: how, why, and what does it mean?

Authors:  Ya-Chen Tina Shih; Michael T Halpern
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 508.702

5.  Using navigators to improve care of underserved patients: current practices and approaches.

Authors:  Daniel Dohan; Deborah Schrag
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Patient navigation: a community centered approach to reducing cancer mortality.

Authors:  Harold P Freeman
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.037

7.  Economic analysis of a child vaccination project among Asian Americans in Philadelphia, Pa.

Authors:  R R Deuson; K G Brodovicz; L Barker; F Zhou; G L Euler
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2001-08

8.  A national survey of health-related work limitations among employed persons in the United States.

Authors:  D J Lerner; B C Amick; S Malspeis; W H Rogers
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2000-03-20       Impact factor: 3.033

9.  Understanding the processes of patient navigation to reduce disparities in cancer care: perspectives of trained navigators from the field.

Authors:  Pascal Jean-Pierre; Samantha Hendren; Kevin Fiscella; Starlene Loader; Sally Rousseau; Bonnie Schwartzbauer; Mechelle Sanders; Jennifer Carroll; Ronald Epstein
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 10.  A review of self-report instruments measuring health-related work productivity: a patient-reported outcomes perspective.

Authors:  Manishi Prasad; Peter Wahlqvist; Rich Shikiar; Ya-Chen Tina Shih
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.981

View more
  14 in total

1.  Key considerations in designing a patient navigation program for colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Amy DeGroff; Kisha Coa; Kerry Grace Morrissey; Elizabeth Rohan; Beth Slotman
Journal:  Health Promot Pract       Date:  2013-12-19

2.  Cost-effectiveness of a peer mentoring intervention to improve disease self-management practices and self-efficacy among African American women with systemic lupus erythematosus: analysis of the Peer Approaches to Lupus Self-management (PALS) pilot study.

Authors:  E M Williams; C L Dismuke; T D Faith; B L Smalls; E Brown; J C Oates; L E Egede
Journal:  Lupus       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 2.911

3.  Perceived discrimination predicts longer time to be accepted for kidney transplant.

Authors:  Larissa Myaskovsky; Donna Almario Doebler; Donna M Posluszny; Mary Amanda Dew; Mark Unruh; Linda F Fried; Galen E Switzer; Sunghee Kim; Chung-Chou H Chang; Mohan Ramkumar; Ron Shapiro
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  Obstetric Provider Perspectives on Postpartum Patient Navigation for Low-Income Patients.

Authors:  Rachel S Ruderman; Emma C Dahl; Brittney R Williams; Joe M Feinglass; Michelle A Kominiarek; William A Grobman; Lynn M Yee
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2021-10-12

5.  A multilevel research perspective on cancer care delivery: the example of follow-up to an abnormal mammogram.

Authors:  Stephen H Taplin; K Robin Yabroff; Jane Zapka
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Patient Navigation As a Model to Increase Participation of African Americans in Cancer Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Mona N Fouad; Aras Acemgil; Sejong Bae; Andres Forero; Nedra Lisovicz; Michelle Y Martin; Gabriela R Oates; Edward E Partridge; Selwyn M Vickers
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 3.840

7.  Costs and outcomes evaluation of patient navigation after abnormal cancer screening: evidence from the Patient Navigation Research Program.

Authors:  Mark E Bensink; Scott D Ramsey; Tracy Battaglia; Kevin Fiscella; Thelma C Hurd; June M McKoy; Steven R Patierno; Peter C Raich; Eric E Seiber; Victoria Warren-Mears; Elizabeth Whitley; Electra D Paskett; S Mandelblatt
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 8.  State-of-the-science of patient navigation as a strategy for enhancing minority clinical trial accrual.

Authors:  Rahel G Ghebre; Lovell A Jones; Jennifer A Wenzel; Michelle Y Martin; Raegan W Durant; Jean G Ford
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  The Care-coordination Approach to Learning Lupus Self-Management: a patient navigator intervention for systemic lupus inpatients.

Authors:  Ashley A White; Aissatou Ba; Trevor Daniel Faith; Viswanathan Ramakrishnan; Clara L Dismuke-Greer; Jim C Oates; Edith Marie Williams
Journal:  Lupus Sci Med       Date:  2021-05

10.  ColoNav: patient navigation for colorectal cancer screening in deprived areas - Study protocol.

Authors:  C Allary; A Bourmaud; F Tinquaut; M Oriol; J Kalecinski; V Dutertre; N Lechopier; M Pommier; Y Benoist; S Rousseau; V Regnier; V Buthion; F Chauvin
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.