BACKGROUND: Patient navigation programs are emerging that aim to address disparities in clinical trial participation among medically underserved populations, including racial/ethnic minorities. However, there is a lack of consensus on the role of patient navigators within the clinical trial process as well as outcome measures to evaluate program effectiveness. METHODS: A review of the literature was conducted of PubMed, Medline, CINHAL, and other sources to identify qualitative and quantitative studies on patient navigation in clinical trials. The search yielded 212 studies, of which only 12 were eligible for this review. RESULTS: The eligible studies reported on the development of programs for patient navigation in cancer clinical trials, including training and implementation among African Americans, American Indians, and Native Hawaiians. A low rate of clinical trial refusal (range, 4%-6%) was reported among patients enrolled in patient navigation programs. However, few studies reported on the efficacy of patient navigation in increasing clinical treatment trial enrollment. CONCLUSIONS: Outcome measures are proposed to assist in developing and evaluating the efficacy and/or effectiveness of patient navigation programs that aim to increase participation in cancer clinical trials. Future research is needed to evaluate the efficacy of patient navigators in addressing barriers to clinical trial participation and increasing enrollment among medically underserved cancer patients.
BACKGROUND:Patient navigation programs are emerging that aim to address disparities in clinical trial participation among medically underserved populations, including racial/ethnic minorities. However, there is a lack of consensus on the role of patient navigators within the clinical trial process as well as outcome measures to evaluate program effectiveness. METHODS: A review of the literature was conducted of PubMed, Medline, CINHAL, and other sources to identify qualitative and quantitative studies on patient navigation in clinical trials. The search yielded 212 studies, of which only 12 were eligible for this review. RESULTS: The eligible studies reported on the development of programs for patient navigation in cancer clinical trials, including training and implementation among African Americans, American Indians, and Native Hawaiians. A low rate of clinical trial refusal (range, 4%-6%) was reported among patients enrolled in patient navigation programs. However, few studies reported on the efficacy of patient navigation in increasing clinical treatment trial enrollment. CONCLUSIONS: Outcome measures are proposed to assist in developing and evaluating the efficacy and/or effectiveness of patient navigation programs that aim to increase participation in cancer clinical trials. Future research is needed to evaluate the efficacy of patient navigators in addressing barriers to clinical trial participation and increasing enrollment among medically underserved cancerpatients.
Authors: Ellen Giarelli; Deborah Watkins Bruner; Ethan Nguyen; Sarah Basham; Priya Marathe; Diane Dao; To Nhu Huynh; Joseph Cappella; Giang Nguyen Journal: J Immigr Minor Health Date: 2011-12
Authors: Michael L Steinberg; Allen Fremont; David C Khan; David Huang; Herschel Knapp; Deborah Karaman; Nell Forge; Keith Andre; Lisa M Chaiken; Oscar E Streeter Journal: Cancer Date: 2006-12-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Joel B Braunstein; Noëlle S Sherber; Steven P Schulman; Eric L Ding; Neil R Powe Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 1.889
Authors: Kevin Fiscella; Elizabeth Whitley; Samantha Hendren; Peter Raich; Sharon Humiston; Paul Winters; Pascal Jean-Pierre; Patricia Valverde; William Thorland; Ronald Epstein Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2012-10 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: B Ashleigh Guadagnolo; Kristin Cina; Petra Helbig; Kevin Molloy; Mary Reiner; E Francis Cook; Daniel G Petereit Journal: J Health Care Poor Underserved Date: 2009-02
Authors: John H Stewart; Alain G Bertoni; Jennifer L Staten; Edward A Levine; Cary P Gross Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2007-08-08 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Emily M Rencsok; Latifa A Bazzi; Rana R McKay; Franklin W Huang; Adam Friedant; Jake Vinson; Samuel Peisch; Jelani C Zarif; Stacey Simmons; Kelly Hawthorne; Paul Villanti; Philip W Kantoff; Elisabeth Heath; Daniel J George; Lorelei A Mucci Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2020-06-05 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Herbert H Pang; Xiaofei Wang; Thomas E Stinchcombe; Melisa L Wong; Perry Cheng; Apar Kishor Ganti; Daniel J Sargent; Ying Zhang; Chen Hu; Sumithra J Mandrekar; Mary W Redman; Judith B Manola; Richard L Schilsky; Harvey J Cohen; Jeffrey D Bradley; Alex A Adjei; David Gandara; Suresh S Ramalingam; Everett E Vokes Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-09-30 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Barbara C Tilley; Arch G Mainous; Daniel W Smith; M Diane McKee; Rossybelle P Amorrortu; Jennifer Alvidrez; Vanessa Diaz; Marvella E Ford; Maria E Fernandez; Robert A Hauser; Carlos Singer; Veronica Landa; Aron Trevino; Stacia M DeSantis; Yefei Zhang; Elvan Daniels; Derrick Tabor; Sally W Vernon Journal: Clin Trials Date: 2017-03-19 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: Jennifer Scalici; Michael A Finan; Jennifer Black; Mary Danner Harmon; William Nicolson; Heather A Lankes; William E Brady; Rodney P Rocconi Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2015-05-23 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Mona N Fouad; Aras Acemgil; Sejong Bae; Andres Forero; Nedra Lisovicz; Michelle Y Martin; Gabriela R Oates; Edward E Partridge; Selwyn M Vickers Journal: J Oncol Pract Date: 2016-05-17 Impact factor: 3.840
Authors: Lauren M Hamel; David W Dougherty; Terrance L Albrecht; Mark Wojda; Alice Jordan; Tanina F Moore; Nicole Senft; Michael Carducci; Elisabeth I Heath; Mark A Manning; Louis A Penner; Seongho Kim; Susan Eggly Journal: JCO Oncol Pract Date: 2019-12-02