Literature DB >> 14974873

A review of self-report instruments measuring health-related work productivity: a patient-reported outcomes perspective.

Manishi Prasad1, Peter Wahlqvist, Rich Shikiar, Ya-Chen Tina Shih.   

Abstract

Health impairment often leads to work impairment in the form of both absenteeism and presenteeism (i.e. reduced productivity while at work). Several self-report productivity instruments have been designed over the past few years to measure the impact of illness on productivity at work and/or in non-work activities. In a review of the literature we identified six generic subjective instruments - the Endicott Work Productivity Scale, Health and Labor Questionnaire, Health and Work Questionnaire, Health and Work Performance Questionnaire, Work Limitations Questionnaire (WLQ) and the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI) - that could theoretically be used in any working population. These instruments were usually validated against other subjective measures (such as health-related QOL). Each productivity instrument has benefits in certain research settings, but the psychometric properties of the WPAI have been assessed most extensively. It was the most frequently used instrument and has also been modified to measure productivity reductions associated with specific diseases (e.g. allergic rhinitis, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, chronic hand dermatitis). The WLQ has also been tested extensively to measure the general health impact and impact of specific conditions. Two migraine-specific subjective instruments were also identified: the Migraine Disability Assessment questionnaire and the Migraine Work and Productivity Loss Questionnaire, of which the latter was found to have better psychometric properties. Productivity outcomes are useful in that they characterise the impact of an illness in the workplace and show the effect of treatment on productivity. Evidence of psychometric properties and generalisability of different instruments was found to a varying degree. Thus, further research is needed to assess the accuracy and usefulness of individual instruments in certain research settings. Health-related productivity has been increasingly recognised as an important component of the burden of illness associated with a given disease; without it, one cannot reliably assess this burden.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14974873     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-200422040-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  34 in total

1.  Productivity costs measurement through quality of life? A response to the recommendation of the Washington Panel.

Authors:  W B Brouwer; M A Koopmanschap; F F Rutten
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  The validity and reproducibility of a work productivity and activity impairment instrument.

Authors:  M C Reilly; A S Zbrozek; E M Dukes
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Towards a new approach for estimating indirect costs of disease.

Authors:  M A Koopmanschap; B M van Ineveld
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  The quality of life and employment in panic disorder.

Authors:  P Ettigi; A S Meyerhoff; J T Chirban; R J Jacobs; R R Wilson
Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.254

5.  Healthcare resource and lost labour costs of migraine headache in the US.

Authors:  J T Osterhaus; D L Gutterman; J R Plachetka
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  The migraine work and productivity loss questionnaire: concepts and design.

Authors:  D J Lerner; B C Amick; S Malspeis; W H Rogers; N C Santanello; W C Gerth; R B Lipton
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Reliability of the migraine disability assessment score in a population-based sample of headache sufferers.

Authors:  W F Stewart; R B Lipton; K Kolodner; J Liberman; J Sawyer
Journal:  Cephalalgia       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 6.292

8.  Validation of a migraine work and productivity loss questionnaire for use in migraine studies.

Authors:  G M Davies; N Santanello; W Gerth; D Lerner; G A Block
Journal:  Cephalalgia       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 6.292

9.  The role of health risk factors and disease on worker productivity.

Authors:  W N Burton; D J Conti; C Y Chen; A B Schultz; D W Edington
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.162

10.  The burden of illness of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: impact on work productivity.

Authors:  B B Dean; J A Crawley; C M Schmitt; J Wong; J J Ofman
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 8.171

View more
  69 in total

1.  Measuring health-related productivity loss.

Authors:  Rebecca J Mitchell; Paul Bates
Journal:  Popul Health Manag       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 2.459

2.  Work productivity and health of informal caregivers of persons with advanced cancer.

Authors:  Susan R Mazanec; Barbara J Daly; Sara L Douglas; Amy R Lipson
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 2.228

3.  Beyond return to work: testing a measure of at-work disability in workers with musculoskeletal pain.

Authors:  Dorcas E Beaton; Carol A Kennedy
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Insomnia in shift work disorder relates to occupational and neurophysiological impairment.

Authors:  Ren Belcher; Valentina Gumenyuk; Thomas Roth
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 4.062

Review 5.  Employee health and presenteeism: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alyssa B Schultz; Dee W Edington
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2007-07-25

6.  Does sickness presenteeism have an impact on future general health?

Authors:  Gunnar Bergström; Lennart Bodin; Jan Hagberg; Tomas Lindh; Gunnar Aronsson; Malin Josephson
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2009-06-06       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 7.  Evaluation of the methodological quality of systematic reviews of health status measurement instruments.

Authors:  Lidwine B Mokkink; Caroline B Terwee; Paul W Stratford; Jordi Alonso; Donald L Patrick; Ingrid Riphagen; Dirk L Knol; Lex M Bouter; Henrica C W de Vet
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 8.  The cost and impact of health conditions on presenteeism to employers: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Alyssa B Schultz; Chin-Yu Chen; Dee W Edington
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 9.  Occupational health of patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ottavia Guglielmi; Bernabé Jurado-Gámez; Francisco Gude; Gualberto Buela-Casal
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2014-06-22       Impact factor: 2.816

10.  Zolpidem extended-release 12.5 mg associated with improvements in work performance in a 6-month randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Milton Erman; Alice Guiraud; Vijay N Joish; Debra Lerner
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 5.849

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.