Literature DB >> 22911332

A multilevel research perspective on cancer care delivery: the example of follow-up to an abnormal mammogram.

Stephen H Taplin1, K Robin Yabroff, Jane Zapka.   

Abstract

In 1999, researchers and policy makers recognized the challenge of creating an integrated patient-centered cancer care process across the many types of care from risk assessment through end of life. More than a decade later, there has been limited progress toward that goal even though the standard reductionist approach to health services and medical research has resulted in major advances in tests, procedures, and individualized patient approaches to care. In this commentary, we propose that considering an entire care process within its multilevel context may increase progress toward an integrated experience and improvements in the quality of care. As an illustrative case, we describe the multilevel context of care delivery for the process of follow-up to an abnormal screening mammogram. By taking a multilevel perspective on this process, we identify a rich set of options for intervening and improving follow-up to abnormalities and, therefore, outcomes of screening. We propose that taking this multilevel perspective when designing interventions may improve the quality of cancer care in an effective and sustainable way. 2012 AACR

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22911332      PMCID: PMC3467321          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-12-0265

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  42 in total

1.  Multilevel intervention research: lessons learned and pathways forward.

Authors:  Steven B Clauser; Stephen H Taplin; Mary K Foster; Pebbles Fagan; Arnold D Kaluzny
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2012-05

Review 2.  How can we increase translation of research into practice? Types of evidence needed.

Authors:  Russell E Glasgow; Karen M Emmons
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 21.981

Review 3.  From the trastuzumab era to new target therapies: beyond revolution.

Authors:  S Barni; F Petrelli; M Cabiddu; M E Cazzaniga; M Cremonesi
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 32.976

4.  Patient navigation and case management following an abnormal mammogram: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Kathleen Ell; Betsy Vourlekis; Pey-Jiuan Lee; Bin Xie
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2006-09-08       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 5.  Deficits in communication and information transfer between hospital-based and primary care physicians: implications for patient safety and continuity of care.

Authors:  Sunil Kripalani; Frank LeFevre; Christopher O Phillips; Mark V Williams; Preetha Basaviah; David W Baker
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Abnormal mammogram follow-up: do community lay health advocates make a difference?

Authors:  Sherry R Crump; Michèle P-L Shipp; Gail G McCray; Selma J Morris; Joel A Okoli; Lee S Caplan; Stacy L Thorne; Daniel S Blumenthal
Journal:  Health Promot Pract       Date:  2008-04

Review 7.  Indications for breast MRI in the patient with newly diagnosed breast cancer.

Authors:  Constance D Lehman; Wendy DeMartini; Benjamin O Anderson; Stephen B Edge
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 11.908

8.  The effect of patient navigation on time to diagnosis, anxiety, and satisfaction in urban minority women with abnormal mammograms: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jeanne M Ferrante; Ping-Hsin Chen; Steve Kim
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2007-09-29       Impact factor: 3.671

Review 9.  Barriers to diagnostic resolution after abnormal mammography: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Debra Wujcik; Alecia Malin Fair
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.592

10.  A culturally tailored navigator program for colorectal cancer screening in a community health center: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Sanja Percac-Lima; Richard W Grant; Alexander R Green; Jeffrey M Ashburner; Gloria Gamba; Sarah Oo; James M Richter; Steven J Atlas
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.128

View more
  29 in total

1.  Evaluating a De-Centralized Regional Delivery System for Breast Cancer Screening and Patient Navigation for the Rural Underserved.

Authors:  Stephen J Inrig; Jasmin A Tiro; Trisha V Melhado; Keith E Argenbright; Simon J Craddock Lee
Journal:  Tex Public Health J       Date:  2014

2.  Variation in Screening Abnormality Rates and Follow-Up of Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening within the PROSPR Consortium.

Authors:  Anna N A Tosteson; Elisabeth F Beaber; Jasmin Tiro; Jane Kim; Anne Marie McCarthy; Virginia P Quinn; V Paul Doria-Rose; Cosette M Wheeler; William E Barlow; Mackenzie Bronson; Michael Garcia; Douglas A Corley; Jennifer S Haas; Ethan A Halm; Aruna Kamineni; Carolyn M Rutter; Tor D Tosteson; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Donald L Weaver
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Neighborhood Predictors of Mammography Barriers Among US-Based Latinas.

Authors:  Yamile Molina; Jesse J Plascak; Donald L Patrick; Sonia Bishop; Gloria D Coronado; Shirley A A Beresford
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2016-04-08

4.  Disparities in breast cancer survival in the United States (2001-2009): Findings from the CONCORD-2 study.

Authors:  Jacqueline W Miller; Judith Lee Smith; A Blythe Ryerson; Thomas C Tucker; Claudia Allemani
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Radiology as the Point of Cancer Patient and Care Team Engagement: Applying the 4R Model at a Patient's Breast Cancer Care Initiation.

Authors:  Christine B Weldon; Sarah M Friedewald; Swati A Kulkarni; Melissa A Simon; Ruth C Carlos; Jonathan B Strauss; Mikele M Bunce; Art Small; Julia R Trosman
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 5.532

6.  Barriers reported among patients with breast and cervical abnormalities in the patient navigation research program: impact on timely care.

Authors:  Mira L Katz; Gregory S Young; Paul L Reiter; Tracy A Battaglia; Kristen J Wells; Mechelle Sanders; Melissa Simon; Donald J Dudley; Steven R Patierno; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb

7.  Multilevel Predictors of Continued Adherence to Breast Cancer Screening Among Women Ages 50-74 Years in a Screening Population.

Authors:  Elisabeth F Beaber; Brian L Sprague; Anna N A Tosteson; Jennifer S Haas; Tracy Onega; Marilyn M Schapira; Anne Marie McCarthy; Christopher I Li; Sally D Herschorn; Constance D Lehman; Karen J Wernli; William E Barlow
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 2.681

8.  Effects of program scale-up on time to resolution for patients with abnormal screening mammography results.

Authors:  Simon Craddock Lee; Robin T Higashi; Joanne M Sanders; Hong Zhu; Stephen J Inrig; Caroline Mejias; Keith E Argenbright; Jasmin A Tiro
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 2.506

9.  Patients' adoption of and feature access within electronic patient portals.

Authors:  Jennifer Elston Lafata; Carrie A Miller; Deirdre A Shires; Karen Dyer; Scott M Ratliff; Michelle Schreiber
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 2.229

10.  Understanding the patient-provider communication needs and experiences of Latina and non-Latina White women following an abnormal mammogram.

Authors:  Yamile Molina; Sarah D Hohl; Linda K Ko; Edgar A Rodriguez; Beti Thompson; Shirley A A Beresford
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.037

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.