Literature DB >> 21775588

A lack of anticipatory remapping of retinotopic receptive fields in the middle temporal area.

Wei Song Ong1, James W Bisley.   

Abstract

The middle temporal (MT) area has traditionally been thought to be a retinotopic area. However, recent functional magnetic resonance imaging and psychophysical evidence have suggested that human MT may have some spatiotopic processing. To gain an understanding of the neural mechanisms underlying this process, we recorded neurons from area MT in awake behaving animals performing a simple saccade task in which a spatially stable moving dot stimulus was presented for 500 ms in one of two locations: the presaccadic receptive field or the postsaccadic receptive field. MT neurons responded as if their receptive fields were purely retinotopic. When the stimulus was placed in the presaccadic receptive field, the response was elevated until the saccade took the stimulus out of the receptive field. When the stimulus was placed in the postsaccadic receptive field, the neuron only began its response after the end of the saccade. No evidence of presaccadic or anticipatory remapping was found. We conclude that gain fields are most likely to be responsible for the spatiotopic signal seen in area MT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21775588      PMCID: PMC3160136          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5589-10.2011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  34 in total

1.  The proprioceptive representation of eye position in monkey primary somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  Xiaolan Wang; Mingsha Zhang; Ian S Cohen; Michael E Goldberg
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2007-04-01       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Maps of visual space in human occipital cortex are retinotopic, not spatiotopic.

Authors:  Justin L Gardner; Elisha P Merriam; J Anthony Movshon; David J Heeger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-04-09       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Psychophysical evidence for spatiotopic processing in area MT in a short-term memory for motion task.

Authors:  Wei Song Ong; Nina Hooshvar; Mingsha Zhang; James W Bisley
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  The reference frame of the motion aftereffect is retinotopic.

Authors:  Tomas Knapen; Martin Rolfs; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Spatial processing in the monkey frontal eye field. I. Predictive visual responses.

Authors:  M M Umeno; M E Goldberg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Spatiotopic selectivity of BOLD responses to visual motion in human area MT.

Authors:  Giovanni d'Avossa; Michela Tosetti; Sofia Crespi; Laura Biagi; David C Burr; Maria Concetta Morrone
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2006-12-31       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  Spatiotopic transfer of visual-form adaptation across saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  David Melcher
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2005-10-11       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  The gender-specific face aftereffect is based in retinotopic not spatiotopic coordinates across several natural image transformations.

Authors:  Arash Afraz; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-09-10       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Neural dynamics of saccadic suppression.

Authors:  Frank Bremmer; Michael Kubischik; Klaus-Peter Hoffmann; Bart Krekelberg
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 10.  Neuronal mechanisms of visual stability.

Authors:  Robert H Wurtz
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-05-29       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  17 in total

1.  Retinotopic memory is more precise than spatiotopic memory.

Authors:  Julie D Golomb; Nancy Kanwisher
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Dynamics of the functional link between area MT LFPs and motion detection.

Authors:  Jackson E T Smith; Vincent Beliveau; Alan Schoen; Jordana Remz; Chang'an A Zhan; Erik P Cook
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Neurons in cortical area MST remap the memory trace of visual motion across saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  Naoko Inaba; Kenji Kawano
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Circuits for presaccadic visual remapping.

Authors:  Hrishikesh M Rao; J Patrick Mayo; Marc A Sommer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Dynamics of eye-position signals in the dorsal visual system.

Authors:  Adam P Morris; Michael Kubischik; Klaus-Peter Hoffmann; Bart Krekelberg; Frank Bremmer
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Receptive field positions in area MT during slow eye movements.

Authors:  Till S Hartmann; Frank Bremmer; Thomas D Albright; Bart Krekelberg
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Anticipatory remapping of attentional priority across the entire visual field.

Authors:  Koorosh Mirpour; James W Bisley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Motion-dependent representation of space in area MT+.

Authors:  Gerrit W Maus; Jason Fischer; David Whitney
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 9.  Visual Remapping.

Authors:  Julie D Golomb; James A Mazer
Journal:  Annu Rev Vis Sci       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 7.745

10.  An Attention-Sensitive Memory Trace in Macaque MT Following Saccadic Eye Movements.

Authors:  Tao Yao; Stefan Treue; B Suresh Krishna
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 8.029

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.