Literature DB >> 19692506

Psychophysical evidence for spatiotopic processing in area MT in a short-term memory for motion task.

Wei Song Ong1, Nina Hooshvar, Mingsha Zhang, James W Bisley.   

Abstract

The middle temporal (MT) area has long been established as a cortical area involved in the encoding of motion information and has been thought to do so in retinotopic coordinates. It was previously shown that memory for motion has a spatial component by demonstrating that subjects do significantly worse on a match-to-sample task when the stimuli to be compared were spatially separated. The distance at which performance deteriorated (the critical spatial separation) increased at increasing eccentricities, suggesting that area MT was involved in the process. In this study, we asked whether optimal performance occurred when the stimuli were in the same retinotopic or spatiotopic coordinates. We found that the performance was best when the stimuli appeared in the same location in space rather than the same retinal location, after an eye movement. We also found that the relationship between retinal eccentricity and the critical spatial separation approximated that of area MT, as found previously. We conclude that area MT plays an important role in the memory for motion process and that this is carried out in spatiotopic coordinates. This conclusion supports the hypothesis that MT processing may have a spatiotopic component.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19692506     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00684.2009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  26 in total

1.  Higher level visual cortex represents retinotopic, not spatiotopic, object location.

Authors:  Julie D Golomb; Nancy Kanwisher
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Retinotopic memory is more precise than spatiotopic memory.

Authors:  Julie D Golomb; Nancy Kanwisher
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Remapping of the line motion illusion across eye movements.

Authors:  David Melcher; Alessio Fracasso
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-04       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Spatial maps for time and motion.

Authors:  Maria Concetta Morrone; Marco Cicchini; David C Burr
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Perceptual learning beyond retinotopic reference frame.

Authors:  En Zhang; Wu Li
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Nonretinotopic exogenous attention.

Authors:  Marco Boi; Mark Vergeer; Haluk Ogmen; Michael H Herzog
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Individual differences in visual motion perception and neurotransmitter concentrations in the human brain.

Authors:  Tatsuto Takeuchi; Sanae Yoshimoto; Yasuhiro Shimada; Takanori Kochiyama; Hirohito M Kondo
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-01-02       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 8.  Position specificity of adaptation-related face aftereffects.

Authors:  Márta Zimmer; Gyula Kovács
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Eye movements help link different views in scene-selective cortex.

Authors:  Julie D Golomb; Alice R Albrecht; Soojin Park; Marvin M Chun
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Visual stability and the motion aftereffect: a psychophysical study revealing spatial updating.

Authors:  Ulrich Biber; Uwe J Ilg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.