Literature DB >> 21771870

Systematic placement of structural water molecules for improved scoring of protein-ligand interactions.

David J Huggins1, Bruce Tidor.   

Abstract

Structural water molecules are found in many protein-ligand complexes. They are known to be vital in mediating hydrogen-bonding interactions and, in some cases, key for facilitating tight binding. It is thus very important to consider water molecules when attempting to model protein-ligand interactions for cognate ligand identification, virtual screening and drug design. While the rigid treatment of water molecules present in structures is feasible, the more relevant task of treating all possible positions and orientations of water molecules with each possible ligand pose is computationally daunting. Current methods in molecular docking provide partial treatment for such water molecules, with modest success. Here we describe a new method employing dead-end elimination to place water molecules within a binding site, bridging interactions between protein and ligand. Dead-end elimination permits a thorough, though still incomplete, treatment of water placement. The results show that this method is able to place water molecules correctly within known complexes and to create physically reasonable hydrogen bonds. The approach has also been incorporated within an inverse molecular design approach, to model a variety of compounds in the process of de novo ligand design. The inclusion of structural water molecules, combined with ranking based on the electrostatic contribution to binding affinity, improves a number of otherwise poor energetic predictions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21771870      PMCID: PMC3170077          DOI: 10.1093/protein/gzr036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Eng Des Sel        ISSN: 1741-0126            Impact factor:   1.650


  58 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Preparation, characterization, and the crystal structure of the inhibitor ZK-807834 (CI-1031) complexed with factor Xa.

Authors:  M Adler; D D Davey; G B Phillips; S H Kim; J Jancarik; G Rumennik; D R Light; M Whitlow
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2000-10-17       Impact factor: 3.162

3.  Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy.

Authors:  Richard A Friesner; Jay L Banks; Robert B Murphy; Thomas A Halgren; Jasna J Klicic; Daniel T Mainz; Matthew P Repasky; Eric H Knoll; Mee Shelley; Jason K Perry; David E Shaw; Perry Francis; Peter S Shenkin
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-03-25       Impact factor: 7.446

4.  On equilibrium structures of the water molecule.

Authors:  Attila G Császár; Gábor Czakó; Tibor Furtenbacher; Jonathan Tennyson; Viktor Szalay; Sergei V Shirin; Nikolai F Zobov; Oleg L Polyansky
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  Extra precision glide: docking and scoring incorporating a model of hydrophobic enclosure for protein-ligand complexes.

Authors:  Richard A Friesner; Robert B Murphy; Matthew P Repasky; Leah L Frye; Jeremy R Greenwood; Thomas A Halgren; Paul C Sanschagrin; Daniel T Mainz
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 7.446

6.  Tertiary templates for proteins. Use of packing criteria in the enumeration of allowed sequences for different structural classes.

Authors:  J W Ponder; F M Richards
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1987-02-20       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  The particle concept: placing discrete water molecules during protein-ligand docking predictions.

Authors:  M Rarey; B Kramer; T Lengauer
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1999-01-01

8.  Hydration in drug design. 2. Influence of local site surface shape on water binding.

Authors:  C S Poornima; P M Dean
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  WaterScore: a novel method for distinguishing between bound and displaceable water molecules in the crystal structure of the binding site of protein-ligand complexes.

Authors:  Alfonso T García-Sosa; Ricardo L Mancera; Philip M Dean
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2003-05-17       Impact factor: 1.810

10.  Evaluation of an inverse molecular design algorithm in a model binding site.

Authors:  David J Huggins; Michael D Altman; Bruce Tidor
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2009-04
View more
  20 in total

1.  Matching of additive and polarizable force fields for multiscale condensed phase simulations.

Authors:  Christopher M Baker; Robert B Best
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 6.006

2.  Simulating Water Exchange to Buried Binding Sites.

Authors:  Ido Y Ben-Shalom; Charles Lin; Tom Kurtzman; Ross C Walker; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 6.006

3.  A solvated ligand rotamer approach and its application in computational protein design.

Authors:  Xiaoqiang Huang; Ji Yang; Yushan Zhu
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 1.810

4.  Incorporating Explicit Water Molecules and Ligand Conformation Stability in Machine-Learning Scoring Functions.

Authors:  Jianing Lu; Xuben Hou; Cheng Wang; Yingkai Zhang
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 4.956

5.  Blind prediction of interfacial water positions in CAPRI.

Authors:  Marc F Lensink; Iain H Moal; Paul A Bates; Panagiotis L Kastritis; Adrien S J Melquiond; Ezgi Karaca; Christophe Schmitz; Marc van Dijk; Alexandre M J J Bonvin; Miriam Eisenstein; Brian Jiménez-García; Solène Grosdidier; Albert Solernou; Laura Pérez-Cano; Chiara Pallara; Juan Fernández-Recio; Jianqing Xu; Pravin Muthu; Krishna Praneeth Kilambi; Jeffrey J Gray; Sergei Grudinin; Georgy Derevyanko; Julie C Mitchell; John Wieting; Eiji Kanamori; Yuko Tsuchiya; Yoichi Murakami; Joy Sarmiento; Daron M Standley; Matsuyuki Shirota; Kengo Kinoshita; Haruki Nakamura; Matthieu Chavent; David W Ritchie; Hahnbeom Park; Junsu Ko; Hasup Lee; Chaok Seok; Yang Shen; Dima Kozakov; Sandor Vajda; Petras J Kundrotas; Ilya A Vakser; Brian G Pierce; Howook Hwang; Thom Vreven; Zhiping Weng; Idit Buch; Efrat Farkash; Haim J Wolfson; Martin Zacharias; Sanbo Qin; Huan-Xiang Zhou; Shen-You Huang; Xiaoqin Zou; Justyna A Wojdyla; Colin Kleanthous; Shoshana J Wodak
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2013-11-23

6.  Lin_F9: A Linear Empirical Scoring Function for Protein-Ligand Docking.

Authors:  Chao Yang; Yingkai Zhang
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 6.162

7.  DOCK 6: Impact of new features and current docking performance.

Authors:  William J Allen; Trent E Balius; Sudipto Mukherjee; Scott R Brozell; Demetri T Moustakas; P Therese Lang; David A Case; Irwin D Kuntz; Robert C Rizzo
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 3.376

8.  Evaluation of an inverse molecular design algorithm in a model binding site.

Authors:  David J Huggins; Michael D Altman; Bruce Tidor
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2009-04

9.  Molecular Mechanism for Attractant Signaling to DHMA by E. coli Tsr.

Authors:  Asuka A Orr; Jingyun Yang; Nitesh Sule; Ravi Chawla; Kenneth G Hull; Mingzhao Zhu; Daniel Romo; Pushkar P Lele; Arul Jayaraman; Michael D Manson; Phanourios Tamamis
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  Protein-ligand docking using FFT based sampling: D3R case study.

Authors:  Dzmitry Padhorny; David R Hall; Hanieh Mirzaei; Artem B Mamonov; Mohammad Moghadasi; Andrey Alekseenko; Dmitri Beglov; Dima Kozakov
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 3.686

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.