Literature DB >> 18831031

Evaluation of an inverse molecular design algorithm in a model binding site.

David J Huggins1, Michael D Altman, Bruce Tidor.   

Abstract

Computational molecular design is a useful tool in modern drug discovery. Virtual screening is an approach that docks and then scores individual members of compound libraries. In contrast to this forward approach, inverse approaches construct compounds from fragments, such that the computed affinity, or a combination of relevant properties, is optimized. We have recently developed a new inverse approach to drug design based on the dead-end elimination and A* algorithms employing a physical potential function. This approach has been applied to combinatorially constructed libraries of small-molecule ligands to design high-affinity HIV-1 protease inhibitors (Altman et al., J Am Chem Soc 2008;130:6099-6013). Here we have evaluated the new method using the well-studied W191G mutant of cytochrome c peroxidase. This mutant possesses a charged binding pocket and has been used to evaluate other design approaches. The results show that overall the new inverse approach does an excellent job of separating binders from nonbinders. For a few individual cases, scoring inaccuracies led to false positives. The majority of these involve erroneous solvation energy estimation for charged amines, anilinium ions, and phenols, which has been observed previously for a variety of scoring algorithms. Interestingly, although inverse approaches are generally expected to identify some but not all binders in a library, due to limited conformational searching, these results show excellent coverage of the known binders while still showing strong discrimination of the nonbinders. (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 18831031      PMCID: PMC2700139          DOI: 10.1002/prot.22226

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  35 in total

Review 1.  ADMET in silico modelling: towards prediction paradise?

Authors:  Han van de Waterbeemd; Eric Gifford
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 2.  Ligand binding: functional site location, similarity and docking.

Authors:  Stephen J Campbell; Nicola D Gold; Richard M Jackson; David R Westhead
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 6.809

3.  A model binding site for testing scoring functions in molecular docking.

Authors:  Binqing Q Wei; Walter A Baase; Larry H Weaver; Brian W Matthews; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2002-09-13       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  A biomolecular force field based on the free enthalpy of hydration and solvation: the GROMOS force-field parameter sets 53A5 and 53A6.

Authors:  Chris Oostenbrink; Alessandra Villa; Alan E Mark; Wilfred F van Gunsteren
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.376

5.  Testing a flexible-receptor docking algorithm in a model binding site.

Authors:  Binqing Q Wei; Larry H Weaver; Anna M Ferrari; Brian W Matthews; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2004-04-09       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 6.  Progress in computational protein design.

Authors:  Shaun M Lippow; Bruce Tidor
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 9.740

7.  Systematic placement of structural water molecules for improved scoring of protein-ligand interactions.

Authors:  David J Huggins; Bruce Tidor
Journal:  Protein Eng Des Sel       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 1.650

8.  De novo protein design: fully automated sequence selection.

Authors:  B I Dahiyat; S L Mayo
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-10-03       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Tertiary templates for proteins. Use of packing criteria in the enumeration of allowed sequences for different structural classes.

Authors:  J W Ponder; F M Richards
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1987-02-20       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Energetic origins of specificity of ligand binding in an interior nonpolar cavity of T4 lysozyme.

Authors:  A Morton; W A Baase; B W Matthews
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1995-07-11       Impact factor: 3.162

View more
  6 in total

1.  Systematic placement of structural water molecules for improved scoring of protein-ligand interactions.

Authors:  David J Huggins; Bruce Tidor
Journal:  Protein Eng Des Sel       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 1.650

2.  Decomposing the energetic impact of drug resistant mutations in HIV-1 protease on binding DRV.

Authors:  Yufeng Cai; Celia A Schiffer
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 6.006

3.  Molecular Basis for Drug Resistance in HIV-1 Protease.

Authors:  Akbar Ali; Rajintha M Bandaranayake; Yufeng Cai; Nancy M King; Madhavi Kolli; Seema Mittal; Jennifer F Murzycki; Madhavi N L Nalam; Ellen A Nalivaika; Ayşegül Özen; Moses M Prabu-Jeyabalan; Kelly Thayer; Celia A Schiffer
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 5.818

4.  Protein design using continuous rotamers.

Authors:  Pablo Gainza; Kyle E Roberts; Bruce R Donald
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 4.475

5.  Combining solvent thermodynamic profiles with functionality maps of the Hsp90 binding site to predict the displacement of water molecules.

Authors:  Kamran Haider; David J Huggins
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 4.956

6.  Thermodynamic Properties of Water Molecules at a Protein-Protein Interaction Surface.

Authors:  David J Huggins; May Marsh; Mike C Payne
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 6.006

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.