Literature DB >> 34469692

Lin_F9: A Linear Empirical Scoring Function for Protein-Ligand Docking.

Chao Yang1, Yingkai Zhang1,2.   

Abstract

Molecular docking is one of the most widely used computational tools in structure-based drug design and is critically dependent on accuracy and robustness of the scoring function. In this work, we introduce a new scoring function Lin_F9, which is a linear combination of nine empirical terms, including a unified metal bond term to specifically describe metal-ligand interactions. Parameters in Lin_F9 are obtained with a multistage fitting protocol using explicit water-included structures. For the CASF-2016 benchmark test set, Lin_F9 achieves the top scoring power among all 34 classical scoring functions for both original crystal poses and locally optimized poses with Pearson correlation coefficients (R) of 0.680 and 0.687, respectively. Meanwhile, in comparison with Vina, Lin_F9 achieves consistently better scoring power and ranking power with various types of protein-ligand complex structures that mimic real docking applications, including end-to-end flexible docking for the CASF-2016 benchmark test set using a single or an ensemble of protein receptor structures, as well as for D3R Grand Challenge (GC4) test sets. Lin_F9 has been implemented in a fork of Smina as an optional built-in scoring function that can be used for docking applications as well as for further improvement of scoring functions and docking protocols. Lin_F9 is accessible through https://yzhang.hpc.nyu.edu/Lin_F9/.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34469692      PMCID: PMC8478859          DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.1c00737

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   6.162


  69 in total

1.  Potential and limitations of ensemble docking.

Authors:  Oliver Korb; Tjelvar S G Olsson; Simon J Bowden; Richard J Hall; Marcel L Verdonk; John W Liebeschuetz; Jason C Cole
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 4.956

2.  Permutation importance: a corrected feature importance measure.

Authors:  André Altmann; Laura Toloşi; Oliver Sander; Thomas Lengauer
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Molecular docking with ligand attached water molecules.

Authors:  Mette A Lie; René Thomsen; Christian N S Pedersen; Birgit Schiøtt; Mikael H Christensen
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 4.956

4.  Systematic placement of structural water molecules for improved scoring of protein-ligand interactions.

Authors:  David J Huggins; Bruce Tidor
Journal:  Protein Eng Des Sel       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 1.650

5.  D3R Grand Challenge 2: blind prediction of protein-ligand poses, affinity rankings, and relative binding free energies.

Authors:  Zied Gaieb; Shuai Liu; Symon Gathiaka; Michael Chiu; Huanwang Yang; Chenghua Shao; Victoria A Feher; W Patrick Walters; Bernd Kuhn; Markus G Rudolph; Stephen K Burley; Michael K Gilson; Rommie E Amaro
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  Mathematical deep learning for pose and binding affinity prediction and ranking in D3R Grand Challenges.

Authors:  Duc Duy Nguyen; Zixuan Cang; Kedi Wu; Menglun Wang; Yin Cao; Guo-Wei Wei
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  Open Babel: An open chemical toolbox.

Authors:  Noel M O'Boyle; Michael Banck; Craig A James; Chris Morley; Tim Vandermeersch; Geoffrey R Hutchison
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 5.514

8.  DockRMSD: an open-source tool for atom mapping and RMSD calculation of symmetric molecules through graph isomorphism.

Authors:  Eric W Bell; Yang Zhang
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 5.514

Review 9.  Machine-learning scoring functions to improve structure-based binding affinity prediction and virtual screening.

Authors:  Qurrat Ul Ain; Antoniya Aleksandrova; Florian D Roessler; Pedro J Ballester
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Mol Sci       Date:  2015-08-28

10.  graphDelta: MPNN Scoring Function for the Affinity Prediction of Protein-Ligand Complexes.

Authors:  Dmitry S Karlov; Sergey Sosnin; Maxim V Fedorov; Petr Popov
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2020-03-09
View more
  4 in total

1.  Scoring Functions for Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction using Structure-Based Deep Learning: A Review.

Authors:  Rocco Meli; Garrett M Morris; Philip C Biggin
Journal:  Front Bioinform       Date:  2022-06-17

Review 2.  Delta Machine Learning to Improve Scoring-Ranking-Screening Performances of Protein-Ligand Scoring Functions.

Authors:  Chao Yang; Yingkai Zhang
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 6.162

Review 3.  Protein-Ligand Docking in the Machine-Learning Era.

Authors:  Chao Yang; Eric Anthony Chen; Yingkai Zhang
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 4.927

4.  XLPFE: A Simple and Effective Machine Learning Scoring Function for Protein-Ligand Scoring and Ranking.

Authors:  Lina Dong; Xiaoyang Qu; Binju Wang
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2022-06-13
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.