Literature DB >> 21766901

Eliciting preferences for reimbursed drugs selection criteria in Côte d'Ivoire.

Vakaramoko Diaby1, Henri Dié Kakou, Jean Lachaine.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Côte d'Ivoire, a West African country, has decided to set up a formulary as part of its universal health insurance (UHI) program. One of its goals will be to facilitate access to safe and efficacious drugs. To guarantee transparency throughout the formulary listing process, it is important to select and value relevant decision criteria for that purpose.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the preferences of healthcare professionals (physicians) when selecting reimbursable drugs and to analyze trade-offs between criteria for formulary listing in Côte d'Ivoire.
METHODS: Choice sets based on four attributes (cost effectiveness of treatments, severity of the disease for which the treatments are indicated, age of the population affected by diseases considered, and social class affected by diseases considered [poor, rich]) were presented in a self-completion questionnaire.
RESULTS: Analysis of questionnaire responses showed that 'cost effectiveness', 'severity of disease', and 'social class' were significant attributes in responder's preferences for reimbursable drugs. More specifically, respondents' choices were more sensitive to drugs that are very cost effective, that target very severe disease, and that target diseases in poor people.
CONCLUSION: This explorative study enabled us to elicit the preferences of a sample of healthcare professionals (physicians) for reimbursed drug selection criteria in Côte d'Ivoire using the discrete-choice experiment method. Further work is required to achieve the ultimate objective of developing a formulary for Côte d'Ivoire.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21766901     DOI: 10.2165/11586060-000000000-00000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient        ISSN: 1178-1653            Impact factor:   3.883


  9 in total

1.  Using conjoint analysis to elicit preferences for health care.

Authors:  M Ryan; S Farrar
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-06-03

Review 2.  Using discrete choice experiments to value health care programmes: current practice and future research reflections.

Authors:  Mandy Ryan; Karen Gerard
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.561

Review 3.  Clarifying efficiency-equity tradeoffs through explicit criteria, with a focus on developing countries.

Authors:  Chris James; Guy Carrin; William Savedoff; Piya Hanvoravongchai
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2005-03

4.  Priority setting using multiple criteria: should a lung health programme be implemented in Nepal?

Authors:  R Baltussen; A H A ten Asbroek; X Koolman; N Shrestha; P Bhattarai; L W Niessen
Journal:  Health Policy Plan       Date:  2007-04-05       Impact factor: 3.344

5.  Balancing equity and efficiency in health priorities in Ghana: the use of multicriteria decision analysis.

Authors:  Caroline Jehu-Appiah; Rob Baltussen; Charles Acquah; Moses Aikins; Salassi Amah d'Almeida; William K Bosu; Xander Koolman; Jeremy Lauer; Dan Osei; Sam Adjei
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.725

6.  Criteria for priority-setting in health care in Uganda: exploration of stakeholders' values.

Authors:  Lydia Kapiriri; Ole Frithjof Norheim
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2004-04-16       Impact factor: 9.408

7.  Conducting discrete choice experiments to inform healthcare decision making: a user's guide.

Authors:  Emily Lancsar; Jordan Louviere
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  Developing a prioritisation framework in an English Primary Care Trust.

Authors:  Edward C F Wilson; John Rees; Richard J Fordham
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2006-02-17

9.  Priority setting of health interventions: the need for multi-criteria decision analysis.

Authors:  Rob Baltussen; Louis Niessen
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2006-08-21
  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  ELICIT: An alternative imprecise weight elicitation technique for use in multi-criteria decision analysis for healthcare.

Authors:  Vakaramoko Diaby; Vassiki Sanogo; Kouame Richard Moussa
Journal:  Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 2.217

2.  Eliciting the public preferences for pharmaceutical subsidy in Iran: a discrete choice experiment study.

Authors:  Mansoor Delpasand; Alireza Olyaaeemanesh; Ebrahim Jaafaripooyan; Akbar Abdollahiasl; Majid Davari; Ali Kazemi Karyani
Journal:  J Pharm Policy Pract       Date:  2021-07-13
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.