Literature DB >> 14619274

Using discrete choice experiments to value health care programmes: current practice and future research reflections.

Mandy Ryan1, Karen Gerard.   

Abstract

There has been growing interest in discrete choice experiments (DCEs) in health economics over the last few years. This paper identifies and describes applications conducted during 1990-2000. From this basis some important areas for future research are reflected upon. These include: having a better understanding of how respondents interpret price, risk and time attributes; strengthening designs and analysis; investigating decision making heuristics employed when completing DCEs, and the extent these are related to the complexity of the task; external validity, reliability and generalisability. Collaborative work with statistical design experts, psychologists, sociologists and qualitative researchers will prove useful when investigating these issues. It is also critical to link, more generally, the research agenda to work being carried out in marketing, transport and environmental economics and health economics benefit assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14619274

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy        ISSN: 1175-5652            Impact factor:   2.561


  183 in total

1.  Discrete choice experiments in health care.

Authors:  Mandy Ryan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-02-14

2.  Validity and Reliability of Willingness-to-Pay Estimates: Evidence from Two Overlapping Discrete-Choice Experiments.

Authors:  Harry Telser; Karolin Becker; Peter Zweifel
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Conjoint Analysis Applications in Health - How are Studies being Designed and Reported?: An Update on Current Practice in the Published Literature between 2005 and 2008.

Authors:  Deborah Marshall; John F P Bridges; Brett Hauber; Ruthanne Cameron; Lauren Donnalley; Ken Fyie; F Reed Johnson
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.883

4.  What do physicians dislike about managed care? Evidence from a choice experiment.

Authors:  Maurus Rischatsch; Peter Zweifel
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2012-06-21

5.  Policy interventions that attract nurses to rural areas: a multicountry discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  D Blaauw; E Erasmus; N Pagaiya; V Tangcharoensathein; K Mullei; S Mudhune; C Goodman; M English; M Lagarde
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 9.408

6.  Comparative analysis of decision maker preferences for equity/efficiency attributes in reimbursement decisions in three European countries.

Authors:  Petra Baji; Manuel García-Goñi; László Gulácsi; Emmanouil Mentzakis; Francesco Paolucci
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2015-08-22

Review 7.  Discrete choice experiments of pharmacy services: a systematic review.

Authors:  Caroline Vass; Ewan Gray; Katherine Payne
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2016-06

8.  Health-related quality of life in Parkinson's: impact of 'off' time and stated treatment preferences.

Authors:  Cicely Kerr; Emily J Lloyd; Charlotte E Kosmas; Helen T Smith; James A Cooper; Karissa Johnston; Emma McIntosh; Andrew J Lloyd
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Things are Looking up Since We Started Listening to Patients: Trends in the Application of Conjoint Analysis in Health 1982-2007.

Authors:  John F P Bridges; Elizabeth T Kinter; Lillian Kidane; Rebekah R Heinzen; Colleen McCormick
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 3.883

10.  Using conjoint analysis to model the preferences of different patient segments for attributes of patient-centered care.

Authors:  Charles E Cunningham; Ken Deal; Heather Rimas; Heather Campbell; Ann Russell; Jennifer Henderson; Anne Matheson; Blake Melnick
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 3.883

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.