Literature DB >> 17412742

Priority setting using multiple criteria: should a lung health programme be implemented in Nepal?

R Baltussen1, A H A ten Asbroek, X Koolman, N Shrestha, P Bhattarai, L W Niessen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To identify and weigh the various criteria for priority setting, and to assess whether a recently evaluated lung health programme in Nepal should be considered a priority in that country.
METHODS: Through a discrete choice experiment with 66 respondents in Nepal, the relative importance of several criteria for priority setting was determined. Subsequently, a set of interventions, including the lung health programme, was rank ordered on the basis of their overall performance on those criteria.
RESULTS: Priority interventions are those that target severe diseases, many beneficiaries and people of middle-age, have large individual health benefits, lead to poverty reduction and are very cost-effective. Certain interventions in tuberculosis control rank highest. The lung health programme ranks 13th out of 34 interventions.
CONCLUSION: This explorative analysis suggests that the lung health programme is among the priorities in Nepal when taking into account a range of relevant criteria for priority setting. The multi-criteria approach can be an important step forward to rational priority setting in developing countries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17412742     DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czm010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy Plan        ISSN: 0268-1080            Impact factor:   3.344


  35 in total

1.  Comparative analysis of decision maker preferences for equity/efficiency attributes in reimbursement decisions in three European countries.

Authors:  Petra Baji; Manuel García-Goñi; László Gulácsi; Emmanouil Mentzakis; Francesco Paolucci
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2015-08-22

2.  Comparative impact assessment of child pneumonia interventions.

Authors:  Louis W Niessen; Anne ten Hove; Henk Hilderink; Martin Weber; Kim Mulholland; Majid Ezzati
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 9.408

3.  Eliciting preferences for reimbursed drugs selection criteria in Côte d'Ivoire.

Authors:  Vakaramoko Diaby; Henri Dié Kakou; Jean Lachaine
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 4.  Cost effectiveness in low- and middle-income countries: a review of the debates surrounding decision rules.

Authors:  Samuel D Shillcutt; Damian G Walker; Catherine A Goodman; Anne J Mills
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Field testing of a multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) framework for coverage of a screening test for cervical cancer in South Africa.

Authors:  Jacqui Miot; Monika Wagner; Hanane Khoury; Donna Rindress; Mireille M Goetghebeur
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2012-02-29

Review 6.  Multicriteria decision analysis in oncology.

Authors:  Georges Adunlin; Vakaramoko Diaby; Alberto J Montero; Hong Xiao
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 7.  Assessing the value of healthcare interventions using multi-criteria decision analysis: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Kevin Marsh; Tereza Lanitis; David Neasham; Panagiotis Orfanos; Jaime Caro
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  Combining multicriteria decision analysis, ethics and health technology assessment: applying the EVIDEM decision-making framework to growth hormone for Turner syndrome patients.

Authors:  Mireille M Goetghebeur; Monika Wagner; Hanane Khoury; Donna Rindress; Jean-Pierre Grégoire; Cheri Deal
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2010-04-08

9.  Health and economic impact of rotavirus vaccination in GAVI-eligible countries.

Authors:  Sun-Young Kim; Steve Sweet; David Slichter; Sue J Goldie
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Eliciting preferences for priority setting in genetic testing: a pilot study comparing best-worst scaling and discrete-choice experiments.

Authors:  Franziska Severin; Jörg Schmidtke; Axel Mühlbacher; Wolf H Rogowski
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 4.246

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.